Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 117–130 | Cite as

Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity

  • Jelena SpanjolEmail author
  • Leona Tam
  • Vivian Tam


This study examines how the match (vs. mismatch) between personal and firm-level values regarding environmental responsibility affects employee job satisfaction and creativity and contributes to three literature streams [i.e., social corporate responsibility, creativity, and person–environment (P–E) fit]. Building on the P–E fit literature, we propose and test environmental orientation fit versus nonfit effects on creativity, identifying job satisfaction as a mediating mechanism and regulatory pressure as a moderator. An empirical investigation indicates that the various environmental orientation fit conditions affect job satisfaction and creativity differently. More specifically, environmental orientation fit produces greater job satisfaction and creativity when the employee and organization both demonstrate high concern for the environment (i.e., a high–high environmental orientation fit condition) than when both display congruent low concern for the environmental (i.e., a low–low environmental orientation fit condition). Furthermore, for employees working in organizations that fit their personal environmental orientation, strong regulatory pressure to comply with environmental standards diminishes the positive fit effect on job satisfaction and creativity, while regulatory pressure does not affect the job satisfaction and creativity of employees whose personal environmental orientation is incongruent with that of the organization.


Environmental orientation Creativity Corporate social responsibility Person–organization fit Job satisfaction 


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). User’s guide for KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Center for Creative Leadership, Working Paper, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrose, M. L., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2008). Individual moral development and ethical climate: The influence of person-organization fit on job attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aragon-Correa, J. A., Matias-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur, W, Jr, Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., & Doverspike, D. (2006). The use of person–organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 786–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee, S. B. (2001). Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5), 510–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I., & Kobeissi, N. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1628–1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, A. B., & Hill, P. R. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolton, S. C., Kim, R., & O’Gorman, K. D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brekke, K. A., & Nyborg, K. (2008). Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(4), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Choi, J. N. (2004). Person–environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57(5), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chowdhury, R. M. M. I., & Fernando, M. (2013). The role of spiritual well-being and materialism in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs: An empirical study with Australian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clemens, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dubinsky, A. J., Howell, R. D., Ingram, T. N., & Bellenger, D. (1986). Salesforce socialization. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person–environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person–environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(2), 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Boss, A. D., Boss, R. W., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jin, K. G., Drozdenko, R., & DeLoughy, S. (2013). The role of corporate value clusters in ethics, social responsibility, and performance: A study of financial professionals and implications for the financial meltdown. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2013). Someone to look up to: Executive-follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management, 39(3), 660–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kauffeld, R., Malhotra, A., & Higgins, S. (2009). Green is a strategy. Strategy + Business 57(Winter), Accessed on March 1, 2013.
  34. Koonmee, K., Singhapakdi, A., Virakul, B., & Lee, D. (2010). Ethics institutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: A survey of human resource managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristof, A. Y. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Billsberry, J. (2013). Fit for the future. In A. L. Kristof-Brown & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 1–18). West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kristof-Brown, A. Y., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person–environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  38. Kristof-Brown, A. Y., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, E. M., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I., Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitute for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 380–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical review. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–32). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
  49. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shrivastava, P. (1996). Greening business: Profiting the corporation and the environment. Cincinnati: Thompson Executive.Google Scholar
  52. Sorescu, A. B., & Spanjol, J. (2008). Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 114–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Gielens, K. (2003). Consumer and market drivers of the probability of new consumer packaged goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone, G. W., & Wakefield, K. L. (2000). Eco-orientation: An extension of market orientation in an environmental context. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 8(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
  55. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlow-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, S. A. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.Google Scholar
  57. Tang, T. L.-P. (2010). From increasing gas efficiency to enhancing creativity: It pays to go green. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relations. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 1–13). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.Google Scholar
  62. Yen, Y., & Yen, S. (2012). Top-management’s role in adopting green purchasing standards in high-tech industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 165–217). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  65. Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 275–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liautaud Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.School of Management, Operations and MarketingUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  3. 3.School of Computing, Engineering and MathematicsUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations