Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 69–84 | Cite as

The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts

Article

Abstract

This study examines the influence of women on the boards of directors of National Health Service Foundation Trusts (FTs) in England. FTs provide a public service where social performance is the primary objective, although financial constraints must be met. Female presence (the proportion of women) is higher for executive directors than non-executives, reflecting the high number of women employed in the sector. We find that a high female presence among executive and non-executive directorships does not result in significant differences either in financial return or service quality. When gender diversity on boards is consistently high (high level of female presence across boards), the benefits on performance of having more women on the board may not be discernible. However, female Chairs or Chief Executives result in significant reductions in negative social outcomes, such as lower clinical negligence costs, without harming financial management. The findings of this study, carried out in a context of high female presence and where a woman frequently occupies one of the two most influential board positions, Chair and Chief Executive, have implications for gender diversity and gender targets on the boards of directors in business and other sectors.

Keywords

Gender diversity Board of directors Public bodies NHS Foundation Trust Corporate governance 

Abbreviations

FT

Foundation Trust

NHS

National Health Service

FRC

Financial Reporting Council

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R. M., & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1098–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BIS. (2011). Department for business, innovation & skills. Women on boards February 2011. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/w/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf. Accessed July 2011.
  6. Bliss, R. T., & Potter, M. E. (2002). Mutual fund managers: Does gender matter? Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 8(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  7. Bouckaert, L., & Vandenhove, J. (1998). Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1073–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, B. K., Haynes, K. T., & Zona, F. (2011). Dimensions of CEO—board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1892–1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bozec, R., & Dia, M. (2007). Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1734–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabrera-Suárez, M. K., Déniz-Déniz, M. C., & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2011). Familiness and market orientation: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caers, R., Du Bois, C., Jegers, M., De Gieter, S., Schepers, C., & Pepermans, R. (2006). Principal-agent relationships on the stewardship-agency axis. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. (2011). How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clatworthy, M. A., Mellett, H. J., & Peel, M. J. (2000). Corporate governance under `New Public Management’: An exemplification. Corporate Governance, An International Review, 8(2), 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connolly, C., Hyndman, N., & McConville, D. (2013). UK charity accounting: An exercise in widening stakeholder engagement. The British Accounting Review, 45, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dacre, J., & Shepherd, S. (2010). Women and medicine. Clinical Medicine, 10(6), 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2010). Women and corporate boards of directors: The promise of increased, and substantive, participation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Business Horizons, 53, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.Google Scholar
  24. Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V., & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate performance and board structure in Belgian companies. Long Range Planning, 34, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Department of Health. (2002). A guide to NHS Foundation Trusts. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  26. Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1072–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Evans, R. W., & Butler, F. C. (2011). An upper echelons view of “good to great”: Principles for behavioral integration in the top management team. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., & Fitzgerald, L. (1995). Corporate governance and the public sector: Some issues and evidence from the NHS. Public Administration, 73, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foo, Y.-B., & Zain, M. M. (2010). Board independence, board diligence and liquidity in Malaysia: A research note. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 6, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, R. L., & Schuhmann, R. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagne, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. FRC. (2010). The UK Corporate Governance code. Financial Reporting Council. London. June. www.frc.org.uk.
  35. FRC. (2011a). Consultation document: Guidance on board effectiveness. Financial Reporting Council. London. March. www.frc.org.uk.
  36. FRC. (2011b). Consultation document: Gender diversity on boards. Financial Reporting Council. London. May. www.frc.org.uk.
  37. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  38. Gazley, B., Chang, W. K., & Bingham, L. B. (2010). Board diversity, stakeholder representation, and collaborative performance in community mediation centers. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 610–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant Thornton. (2011). Corporate governance review 2011. A changing climate. Fresh challenges ahead. www.grant-thornton.co.uk.
  40. Grant Thornton. (2012). NHS Governance Review 2012. Delivering good governance. www.grant-thornton.co.uk.
  41. Grant Thornton. (2013). NHS Governance Review 2013. The formula for clear governance. Finding the equilibrium. www.grant-thornton.co.uk.
  42. Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 314–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
  46. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How Do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. HSCIC. (2012). Health and Social Care Information Centre, Provisional NHS Hospital & Community Health Service (HCHS) monthly workforce statistics. Health and Social Care Information Centre. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/provisionalmonthlyhchsworkforce. Accessed November 2013.
  49. Huse, M., Nielsen, S. T., & Hagen, I. M. (2009). Women and employee-elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10, 35–43.Google Scholar
  51. Ibrahim, N., & Angelidis, J. (2009). The relative importance of ethics as a selection criterion for entry-level public accountants: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., & Tomic, I. M. (2009). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobson, W. S., Palus, C. K., & Bowling, C. J. (2010). A woman’s touch? Gendered management and performance in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jarboe, N. (2012). Women count: charity leaders 2012. Benchmarking the participation of women in the UK’s largest charities. Women Count. www.women-count.org.
  55. Jurkus, A. F., Chul, P. J., & Woodard, L. S. (2011). Women in top management and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 64, 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kaplan, S., Pany, K., Samuels, J., & Zhang, J. (2009). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirkman, B., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: The antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krishnan, H. A., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women—on top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1712–1720.Google Scholar
  59. Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Krivogorsky, V. (2006). Ownership, board structure, and performance in continental Europe. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 176–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lämsä, A. M., Vehkaperä, M., Puttonen, T., & Pesonen, H. L. (2008). Effect of business education on women and men students’ attitudes on corporate responsibility in society. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in california and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miller, J. L. (2002). The board as a monitor of organizational activity. The applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management & Leadersip, 12(4), 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miller-Millesen, J. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Monitor. (2010). The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance. Monitor. London. www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk.
  71. Nelson, T. & Levesque, L. L. (2007). The status of women in corporate governance in high-growth, high-potential firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 209–232.Google Scholar
  72. Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. NLC. (2010). The healthy NHS board principles for good governance. London: NHS National Leadership Council. Google Scholar
  74. Peterson, R. A., Albaum, G., Merunka, D., Munuera, J. L., & Smith, S. M. (2010). Effects of nationality, gender, and religiosity on business-related ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Tacheva, S. (2007). Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sealy, R. & Vinnicombe, S. (2012). The female FTSE Board Report 2012. Milestone or Millstone? Cranfield International Centre for Women Leaders.Google Scholar
  80. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sun, J., Liu, G., & Lan, G. (2011). Does female directorship on independent audit committees constrain earnings management? Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taylor, K. S., Lambert, T. W., & Goldacre, M. J. (2009). Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys. British Medical Journal, 338(b1735), 12.Google Scholar
  83. Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Valentine, S. R., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executives in international business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Integrating agency theory with stakeholder and stewardship theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application to the upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wellens, L. & Jegers, M. (2013). Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. European Management Journal, 21. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.007.
  88. Wright, J. S. F., Dempster, P. G., Keen, J., Allen, P., & Hutchings, A. (2012). The new governance arrangements for NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals: Reframing governors as meta regulators. Public Administration, 90(2), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Young, S. (2000). The increasing use of non-executive directors: Its impact on uk board structure and governance arrangements. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(9 & 10), 1311–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zona, F. (2013). Board leadership structure and diversity over CEO time in office: A test of the evolutionary perspective on Italian firms. European Management Journal. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.10.002.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and FinanceUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Accounting and FinanceUniversidad ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations