Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Including High Politics?
- 1k Downloads
This article explores whether political corporate social responsibility (PCSR) may be better understood through its inclusion into the realm of high politics instead of its current characterization as belonging to low politics. The key argument is that the growing role of private companies in the provision of security is too widespread and its implications are too important to be ignored by the PCSR literature. By extending the scope of its inquiry into high politics, the insights from PCSR research could enrich the debates in several other social sciences that also study political roles of private companies. An interdisciplinary dialog about the numerous inroads of private companies into high politics could help the PCSR scholars in their quest to reach beyond an instrumental view of corporate politics.
KeywordsCorporate security responsibility High politics Interdisciplinary dialog Low politics Political corporate social responsibility New security threats Privatization of security
The author wishes to thank Mitchell A. Belfer and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on this article. The usual disclaimer applies. The author gratefully acknowledges financial support of the Czech Science Foundation under the standard research Grant No. P408/11/0395.
- Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2011). Security beyond the state: Private security in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Avant, D. (2004). The market for force: The consequences of privatizing security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ballentine, K., & Sherman, J. (2003). The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Berdal, M., & Malone, D. M. (2000). Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
- Bigo, D., Bonelli, L., Guittet, E., Olsson, C., & Tsoukala, A. (2006). Illiberal practices of liberal regimes: The (in)security games. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
- Boerzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2006). Public–private partnerships: Effective and legitimate tools of transnational governance? In E. Grande & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Complex sovereignty (pp. 195–216). Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
- Bursh, N. E., & Givens, A. D. (2012). Public–private partnerships in homeland security: Opportunities and challenges. Homeland Security Affairs, 8(18), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
- Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2008). The vulnerability of vital systems: How critical infrastructure became a security problem. In M. D. Cavelty & K. S. Kristensen (Eds.), Securing ‘the Homeland’: Critical infrastructure, risk and (in)security (pp. 17–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dempsey, J. S. (2011). Introduction to private security. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- DeWinter-Schmitt, R., & Heatther, E. (2013). A critical analysis of proliferation, dynamic interaction, and evolution of self-regulation within the private security industry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA, San Francisco, USA. http://files.isanet.org/ConferenceArchive/def4a7fa3c4346398f74a58a0db20335.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013.
- Dunn-Cavelty, M., & Kristensen, K. S. (2008). Securing ‘the Homeland’: Critical infrastructure, risk and (in)security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.Google Scholar
- Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Klare, M. T. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
- Lee, E. (2009). Homeland security and private sector business: Corporation’s role in critical infrastructure protection. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–50.Google Scholar
- Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilizing security: Policing and political community in a global era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Müller-Wille, B. (2004). For our eyes only? Shaping an intelligence community within the EU. Occasional papers no. 50. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
- Neron, P. Y., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship Inc.: Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
- Ortiz, C. (2010). Private armed forces and global security: A guide to the issues. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Ougaard, M. (2010). Introducing business and global governance. In M. Ougaard & A. Leander (Eds.), Business and global governance (pp. 1–36). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Petersen, K. L. (2013). The corporate security professional: A hybrid agent between corporate and national security. Paper presented at the ISA’s annual meeting, San Francisco, USA. http://files.isanet.org/ConferenceArchive/41b0823857654c71ae63da45c4d6c257.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013.
- Singer, P. W. (2003). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. (2004). The 9/11 commission report. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/index.htm. Accessed 21 November 2008.
- Vlcek, W. (2006). Acts to combat the financing of terrorism: Common foreign and security policy at the European court of justice. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11, 491–507.Google Scholar