Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 237–249 | Cite as

Multiple Facets of Compassion: The Impact of Social Dominance Orientation and Economic Systems Justification

  • Daniel Martin
  • Emma Seppala
  • Yotam Heineberg
  • Tim Rossomando
  • James Doty
  • Philip Zimbardo
  • Ting-Ting Shiue
  • Rony Berger
  • YanYan Zhou
Article

Abstract

Business students appear predisposed to select disciplines consistent with pre-existing worldviews. These disciplines (e.g., economics) then further reinforce the worldviews which may not always be adaptive. For example, high levels of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) is a trait often found in business school students (Sidanius et al., Political Psychol 12(4):691–721, 1991). SDO is a competitive and hierarchical worldview and belief-system that ascribes people to higher or lower social rankings. While research suggests that high levels of SDO may be linked to lower levels of empathy, research has not established the potential relationship between another related adaptive trait in the workplace, compassion. Compassion facilitates workplace performance by lowering levels of litigation, easing stress, and facilitating cooperation. Accordingly, the following study aimed to examine the relationship between SDO and compassion while hypothesizing Economic Systems Justification (ESJ) would mediate this relationship. Because of the importance of compassion in the workplace, the prevalence of SDO in the business academic community (Sidanius et al. 1991) and the topicality of ESJ, we conducted our study with business school students. Results confirmed all but one hypothesis.

Keywords

Social dominance orientation Economic systems justification Compassion 

References

  1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1990). Dominant ideologies. Sydney, Australia: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and ameta-analysis of the effectiveness of Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2–4), 109–160. doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2003). Why does affect matter in organizations? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, R., Gelkopf, M., Heinberg, Y., & Zimbardo, P. (in press). Developing resiliency and promoting tolerance toward the other in elementary school students facing ongoing rocket shelling.Google Scholar
  5. Blincoe, S., & Harris, M. J. (2009). Prejudice reduction in white students: Comparing three conceptual approaches. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4), 232–242. doi: 10.1037/a0017851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barret, R. (2012). Love, fear and the destiny of nations: The impact of the evolution of human consciousness on world affairs. Amazon Digital Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4(2), 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725. doi: 10.2307/258391.Google Scholar
  9. Brockner, J. (1992). Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors. California Management Review, 34(2), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brockner, J. (1994). Perceived fairness and survivors’ reactions to layoffs, or how downsizing organizations can do well by doing good. Social Justice Research, 7, 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheon, B. K., Im, D., Harada, T., Kim, J., Mathur, V. A., Scimeca, J. M., et al. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. Neuroimage, 57(2), 642–650. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Lipke, T. (2009). Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers. Annual New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04508.x.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cosley, B. J., McCoy, S. K., Saslow, L. R., & Epel, E. S. (2010). Is compassion for others stress buffering? Consequences of compassion and social support for physiological reactivity to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 816–823. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Creswell, J. D., Welch, W. T., Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mann, T. (2005). Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychological Science, 16(11), 846–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crocker, J., Niiya, Y., & Mischkowski, D. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19(7), 740–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02150.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Depue, R. A., & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313–395. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000063.Google Scholar
  18. Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Jones, W. H. (2005). Personality: Contemporary theory and research (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.Google Scholar
  19. Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59–96.Google Scholar
  20. Ensari, N. K., & Miller, N. (2006). The application of the personalization model in diversity management. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 589–607. doi: 10.1177/1368430206067679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 79–87. doi: 10.2307/256899.Google Scholar
  22. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, N., & Rivis, A. (2010). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research And Practice, 84(3), 239–255. doi: 10.1348/147608310X526511.Google Scholar
  24. Gilbert, P., & Procter, S. (2006). Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self-criticism: Overview and pilot study. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 353–379. doi: 10.1002/cpp.507.Google Scholar
  25. Grant, K. (2008). Who are the lepers in our organizations? A case for compassionate leadership. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 3(2-), 75–91.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of ‘dark personalities’ (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hwang, J. Y., Lackey, K., & Plante, T. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s compassionate love scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56, 421–428. doi: 10.1007/s11089-007-0117-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Economic systems justification: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jost, J., Pelham, B., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 586–602. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808–827. doi: 10.1177/0002764203260211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20(1), 99–126. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557–590. doi: 10.2307/2667109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLaughlin, E., Huges, G., Fergusson, R., & Westmarland, L. (2003). Restorative justice critical issues. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. McFarland, S. G. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Molinsky, A. L., Grant, A. M., & Margolis, J. D. (2012). The bedside manner of homo economicus: How and why priming an economic schema reduces compassion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. doi: 10.1080/15298860309027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neff, K. D., & Germer, K. C. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263–287. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 23–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reich, W. (1989). Speaking of suffering: A moral account of compassion. Soundings, 72(1), 83–108.Google Scholar
  48. Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476–485.Google Scholar
  49. Rockliff, H., Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Lightman, S., & Glover, D. (2008). A pilot exploration of heart rate variability and salivary cortisol responses to compassion-focused imagery. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 5(3), 132–139.Google Scholar
  50. Sherman, K. D., Bunyan, P. D., Creswell, J. D., & Jaremka, M. L. (2009). Psychological vulnerability and stress: The effects of self-affirmation on sympathetic nervous system responses to naturalistic stressors. Health Psychology, 28(5), 554–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559.Google Scholar
  52. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). Racism and support of free-market capitalism: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14(3), 381–401. doi: 10.2307/3791704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Martin, M., & Stallworth, L. M. (1991). Consensual racism and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory. Political Psychology, 12(4), 691–721. doi: 10.2307/3791552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2012). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.Google Scholar
  58. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 77–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Umphress, E. E., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Dietz, J. (2007). When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Laar, C., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Sinclair, S. (1999). The three Rs of academic achievement: Reading, ‘riting, and racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 139–151. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zellars, K. L., & Perrewé, P. L. (2001). Affective personality and the content of emotional social support: Coping in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 459. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Martin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emma Seppala
    • 2
  • Yotam Heineberg
    • 2
  • Tim Rossomando
    • 2
  • James Doty
    • 2
  • Philip Zimbardo
    • 2
  • Ting-Ting Shiue
    • 3
  • Rony Berger
    • 4
    • 5
  • YanYan Zhou
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of ManagementCalifornia State University, East BayHaywardUSA
  2. 2.Stanford University-Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE)StanfordUSA
  3. 3.Palo Alto UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  4. 4.Ben Gurion UniversityBeershebaIsreal
  5. 5.Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsreal
  6. 6.California State University, East BayHaywardUSA

Personalised recommendations