Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 59–75 | Cite as

Will You Purchase Environmentally Friendly Products? Using Prediction Requests to Increase Choice of Sustainable Products

  • H. Onur Bodur
  • Kimberly M. Duval
  • Bianca Grohmann
Article

Abstract

Research shows that commitment-based interventions are among the most effective strategies to encourage pro-environmental behaviors, but methods to elicit commitments from a large number of individuals (i.e., door-to-door or phone campaigns) are often costly and unrealistic. Predictions requests—a commitment-type strategy—are an effective mass-communication strategy and have the potential to influence pro-environmental behavior among large audiences. This research is the first to demonstrate that prediction requests in a consumer behavior context influence preference for environmentally friendly products. In addition, this research examines the role of individual and contextual factors in influencing the efficacy of prediction requests. Study 1 shows that exposure to an advertisement with a prediction request leads to increased preferences for environmentally sustainable (vs. traditional) household cleaning products, compared to a control advertisement, and that this effect is greater when the prediction request is paired with an audience cue (vs. prediction request only). Study 2 indicates that the effect of prediction requests on preference for sustainable products is greater for individuals with interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal. Substantive implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Sustainability in marketing Ethical consumption Ethical attributes Self-prophecy Self-construal Social influence Social responsibility 

References

  1. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, E. (1969). A theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.Google Scholar
  5. Aronson, E. (1992). The return of repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atalay, A. S., Bodur, H. O., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2012). Shining in the center: Central gaze cascade effect on product choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 848–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bachman, W., & Katzev, R. (1982). The effects of non-contingent free bus tickets and personal commitment on urban bus ridership. Transportation Research Part A: General, 16(2), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bateman, C. R., & Valentine, S. R. (2010). Investigating the effects of gender on consumers’ moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonini, S., & Oppenheim, J. (2008). Cultivating the green consumer. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 56–61.Google Scholar
  12. Bourrat, P., Baumard, N., & McKay, R. (2011). Surveillance cues enhance moral condemnation. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(2), 193–199.Google Scholar
  13. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behavior of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandon, P., Smith, R. J., Morwitz, V. G., Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E. (2011). When does the past repeat itself? The interplay of behavior prediction and personal norms. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An experimental ethnography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conty, L., Russo, M., Loehr, V., Hugueville, L., Barbu, S., Huguet, P., et al. (2010). The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task. Social Neuroscience, 5(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. D’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeLeon, I. G., & Fuqua, R. W. (1995). The effects of public commitment and group feedback on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dholakia, U. M. (2010). A critical review of question–behavior effect research. Review of Marketing Research, 7, 145–197.Google Scholar
  26. Dickerson, C. A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(11), 841–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 275–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ekström, M. (2012). Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment. Experimental Economics, 15(3), 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behaviors, 32(3), 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(May), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Froming, W. J., Walker, G. R., & Lopyan, K. J. (1982). Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(5), 476–487.Google Scholar
  33. García de los Salmones, M. M., Herero, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 389–400.Google Scholar
  37. Hietanen, J. K., Leppänen, J. M., Peltola, M. J., Linna-aho, K., & Ruuhiala, H. J. (2008). Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach–avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2423–2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of Easterners and Westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Katzev, R. D., & Pardini, A. (1987–1988). The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment in motivating community recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 17, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Katzev, R., & Wang, T. (1994). Can commitment change behavior? A case study of environmental actions. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 9, 13–26.Google Scholar
  41. Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “Walk the Talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review, 16(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
  42. Kitayama, S., & Imada, T. (2010). Social eyes and choice justification: Culture and dissonance revisited. Social Cognition, 28(5), 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan’s Northern Frontier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R., & Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any free’ choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychological Science, 15(8), 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knackstedt, G., & Kleinke, C. L. (1990). Eye contact, gender, and personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 131(2), 303–304.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lin, Y. C., & Chang, C. C. A. (2012). Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lokhorst, A. M., Werner, C., Staats, H., van Dijk, E., & Gale, J. L. (2013). Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matthies, E., Klöckner, C., & Preibner, C. (2006). Applying a modified moral decision making model to change habitual car use—How can commitment be effective? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mintel. (2006). Green living. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.mintel.com.
  56. Mintel. (2011). Green living. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.mintel.com.
  57. Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Osak, M. (2011, October 20). Why consumers are slow to embrace green products. The Financial Post. Retrieved from http://www.financialpost.com/index.html.
  59. Ottman, J. (1998). Green marketing: Opportunity for innovation. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.Google Scholar
  60. Pallak, M. S., Cook, D. A., & Sullivan, J. J. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Policy Studies Review Annual, 4, 352.Google Scholar
  61. Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2012). Articulating the meanings of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Research, 110(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
  62. Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pelletier, L. G. (2002). A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behaviors. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 205–232). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  64. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Phillips, A. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Self-awareness and the emotional consequences of self-discrepancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., & Nettle, D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118(11), 1096–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ramsey, R. P., Marshall, G. W., Johnston, M. W., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. (2006). Ethical ideologies and older consumer perceptions of unethical sales tactics. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Randall, M. D., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Research & Insights. (2008). Green Gap Survey (Cone LLC). Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.conecomm.com/2008-green-gap-survey.
  70. Scheier, M. F., Fenigstein, A., & Buss, A. H. (1974). Self-awareness and physical aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(3), 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations (pp. 21–43). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  72. Sebastiani, R., Montagnini, F., & Dalli, D. (2013). Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry. Evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Research, 114, 473–488.Google Scholar
  73. Sen, S. S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer Responses to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sherman, S. J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Silvia, P. J. (2002). Self-awareness and emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 16(2), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Silvia, P. J., & Gendolla, G. H. (2001). On introspection and self-perception: Does self-focused attention enable accurate self-knowledge? Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Spangenberg, E. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1999). Social influence by requesting self-prophecy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Spangenberg, E. R., & Obermiller, C. (1996). To cheat or not to cheat: Reducing cheating by requesting self-prophecy. Marketing Education Review, 6(3), 95–103.Google Scholar
  82. Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E. (2006). Self-monitoring and susceptibility to the influence of self-prophecy. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 550–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E., Grohmann, B., & Smith, R. J. (2003). Mass-communicated prediction requests: Practical application and a cognitive dissonance explanation for self-prophecy. Journal of Marketing, 67, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E., Knuff, D. C., Smith, R. J., Obermiller, C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2012). Process evidence for the question–behavior effect: Influencing socially normative behaviors. Social Influence, 7(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sprott, D. E., Smith, R. J., Spangenberg, E. R., & Freson, T. S. (2004). Specificity of prediction requests: Evidence for the differential effects of self-prophecy on commitment to a health assessment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 1176–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sprott, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., Block, L. G., Fitzsimons, G. J., Morwitz, V. G., & Williams, P. (2006). The question–behavior effect: What we know and where we go from here. Social Influence, 1(2), 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sprott, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Fisher, R. (2003). The importance of normative beliefs to the self-prophecy effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Steenkamp, J. B. E., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist, 36(4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K. A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 820–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the public self. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 60, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. United Nations Environmental Program. (2005). UNEP, UN Global Compact and Utopies talk the walk: Advancing sustainable lifestyles through marketing and communications. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org.
  95. Van Kerckhove, A., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2008). The effect of sequential self-predictions on behavior change. Latin American Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 166–167.Google Scholar
  96. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Research, 10(5), 365–375.Google Scholar
  97. Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wells, W. D. (1993). Discovery-oriented consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wiekens, C. J., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Self-awareness and saliency of social versus individualistic behavioral standards. Social Psychology, 41(1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Onur Bodur
    • 1
  • Kimberly M. Duval
    • 1
  • Bianca Grohmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Marketing DepartmentConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations