Will You Purchase Environmentally Friendly Products? Using Prediction Requests to Increase Choice of Sustainable Products
Research shows that commitment-based interventions are among the most effective strategies to encourage pro-environmental behaviors, but methods to elicit commitments from a large number of individuals (i.e., door-to-door or phone campaigns) are often costly and unrealistic. Predictions requests—a commitment-type strategy—are an effective mass-communication strategy and have the potential to influence pro-environmental behavior among large audiences. This research is the first to demonstrate that prediction requests in a consumer behavior context influence preference for environmentally friendly products. In addition, this research examines the role of individual and contextual factors in influencing the efficacy of prediction requests. Study 1 shows that exposure to an advertisement with a prediction request leads to increased preferences for environmentally sustainable (vs. traditional) household cleaning products, compared to a control advertisement, and that this effect is greater when the prediction request is paired with an audience cue (vs. prediction request only). Study 2 indicates that the effect of prediction requests on preference for sustainable products is greater for individuals with interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal. Substantive implications and directions for future research are discussed.
KeywordsSustainability in marketing Ethical consumption Ethical attributes Self-prophecy Self-construal Social influence Social responsibility
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Aronson, E. (1969). A theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.Google Scholar
- Bonini, S., & Oppenheim, J. (2008). Cultivating the green consumer. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 56–61.Google Scholar
- Bourrat, P., Baumard, N., & McKay, R. (2011). Surveillance cues enhance moral condemnation. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(2), 193–199.Google Scholar
- Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behavior of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dholakia, U. M. (2010). A critical review of question–behavior effect research. Review of Marketing Research, 7, 145–197.Google Scholar
- Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Froming, W. J., Walker, G. R., & Lopyan, K. J. (1982). Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(5), 476–487.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 389–400.Google Scholar
- Katzev, R., & Wang, T. (1994). Can commitment change behavior? A case study of environmental actions. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 9, 13–26.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “Walk the Talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review, 16(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
- Knackstedt, G., & Kleinke, C. L. (1990). Eye contact, gender, and personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 131(2), 303–304.Google Scholar
- Mintel. (2006). Green living. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.mintel.com.
- Mintel. (2011). Green living. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.mintel.com.
- Osak, M. (2011, October 20). Why consumers are slow to embrace green products. The Financial Post. Retrieved from http://www.financialpost.com/index.html.
- Ottman, J. (1998). Green marketing: Opportunity for innovation. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.Google Scholar
- Pallak, M. S., Cook, D. A., & Sullivan, J. J. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Policy Studies Review Annual, 4, 352.Google Scholar
- Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2012). Articulating the meanings of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Research, 110(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
- Pelletier, L. G. (2002). A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behaviors. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 205–232). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Research & Insights. (2008). Green Gap Survey (Cone LLC). Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.conecomm.com/2008-green-gap-survey.
- Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations (pp. 21–43). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Sebastiani, R., Montagnini, F., & Dalli, D. (2013). Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry. Evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Research, 114, 473–488.Google Scholar
- Spangenberg, E. R., & Obermiller, C. (1996). To cheat or not to cheat: Reducing cheating by requesting self-prophecy. Marketing Education Review, 6(3), 95–103.Google Scholar
- United Nations Environmental Program. (2005). UNEP, UN Global Compact and Utopies talk the walk: Advancing sustainable lifestyles through marketing and communications. Accessed July 1, 2013, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org.
- Van Kerckhove, A., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2008). The effect of sequential self-predictions on behavior change. Latin American Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 166–167.Google Scholar
- Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Research, 10(5), 365–375.Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar