Institutionally Driven Moral Conflicts and Managerial Action: Dirty Hands or Permissible Complicity?
- 473 Downloads
This paper examines what managers ought to do when confronted with apparent moral conflicts between their managerial responsibilities and the general requirements of morality, specifically when those conflicts are driven by the institutional environment. I examine Google’s decision to enter the Chinese search engine market as an example of such a conflict. I consider the view that Google’s managers engaged in justifiable moral compromise in making the choice to engage in self-censorship and show how this view depends on the idea of genuine moral dilemmas or irresolvable moral conflicts. I argue that there are serious reasons to doubt the existence of genuine moral dilemmas both in the abstract, as well as in the context of managerial responsibility. I propose an alternative account for what Google’s managers ought to do, as well as others who face relevantly similar situations. The account contains two conditions for permissibly contributing to another party’s failure to live up to their moral responsibilities. The first condition is that the manager must intend and act in such a way as to minimize the firm’s complicity in the other entity or actor’s failure, which in most cases will imply a duty for the manager to take actions that aim towards changing the institutional context. Under the second condition, managers ought to communicate to the firm’s constituents that they take seriously the importance of the interests at stake.
KeywordsCorporate responsibility Dirty hands Human rights Intentionality Managerial responsibility Moral conflict Moral dilemmas
I would like to thank the following individuals for their feedback and support in the development of this article: Nien-hê Hsieh, Vince West, Alan Strudler, Thomas Donaldson, Diana Robertson, Philip Nichols, Waheed Hussain, Kenneth Goodpaster, Pati Provinske, Daryl Koehn, Dawn Elm, and Katherina Glac.
- Aquinas, T. (1920). Summa Theologiae. (Fathers of the Dominican Province, Trans.) (2nd, Revised Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.newadvent.org/summa/index.html.
- Benjamin, M. (1990). Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
- Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dahl, N. O. (1996). Morality, moral dilemmas, and moral requirements. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Morality, moral dilemmas, and moral requirements (pp. 86–101). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T. (1992). The ethics of international business. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Drummond, D. (2010, January 12). A new approach to China. Official Google Blog. Retrieved from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html.
- Enlightenment man. (2008, December 4). The economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/12673407?story_id=12673407.
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, p. SM17.Google Scholar
- Google. (2012a, June 5). Google Code of Conduct. Google, Inc. Retrieved from http://investor.google.com/corporate/code-of-conduct.html.
- Google. (2012b, June 5). Ten things we know to be true. Google, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/.
- Gowans, C. W. (1987). Introduction: The debate on moral dilemmas. In C. W. Gowans (Ed.), Moral dilemmas (pp. 3–33). USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gowans, C. (1996). Moral theory, moral dilemmas, and moral responsibility. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and moral theory (pp. 199–215). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hill, T. E. (1996). Moral dilemmas, gaps, and residues: A Kantian perspective. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and moral theory (pp. 167–198). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hirshman, L. R. (2006). Get to work: A manifesto for women of the world. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
- Luban, D. J. (2011). Risk taking and force protection. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1855263.
- Mason, H. E. (1996). Introduction. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and moral theory (pp. 3–9). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McConnell, T. (1996). Moral residue and dilemmas. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and moral theory (pp. 36–47). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McConnell, T. (2010). Moral dilemmas. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/moral-dilemmas/.
- McLaughlin, A. (2006, January 27). Google in China. Official Google Blog. Retrieved from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/google-in-china.html.
- Ruggie, J. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework (No. A/HRC/17/31). United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.
- Santoro, M. A. (2009). China 2020: How western business can-and should-influence social and political change in the coming decade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, T. M. (2008). Moral dimensions: Permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1988). Moral dilemmas. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Stout, L. (2002). Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Southern California Law Review, 75, 1189–1210.Google Scholar
- Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
- Thompson, C. (2006, April 23). Google’s China problem (and China’s Google Problem). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/23/magazine/23google.html.
- UN Global Compact. (2011). The ten principles. Retrieved from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/index.html.
- United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011, June 16). New guiding principles on business and human rights endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council. Press Release. Retrieved from http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-endorsed-16-jun-2011.pdf.
- Vascellaro, J. E. (2010a, January 14). A heated debate at the top. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704675104575001281662251848.html.
- Vascellaro, J. E. (2010b, March 24). Brin drove google to pull back in China. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141064259998090.html.
- Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (1965). Ethical consistency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, (Supplement), 39, 103–124.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (1972). Morality: An introduction to ethics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar