Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 128, Issue 3, pp 495–504 | Cite as

Corporate Psychopathy: Can ‘Search and Destroy’ and ‘Hearts and Minds’ Military Metaphors Inspire HRM Solutions?

  • Alasdair J. Marshall
  • Melanie J. Ashleigh
  • Denise Baden
  • Udechukwu Ojiako
  • Marco G. D. Guidi
Article

Abstract

Corporate psychopathy (CP) thrives perhaps as the most significant threat to ethical corporate behaviour around the world. We argue that Human Resources Management (HRM) professionals should formulate strategic solutions metaphorically by balancing what strategic military planners famously call ‘Search and Destroy’ (SD) and ‘Hearts and Minds’ (HM) counter-terrorist strategy. We argue that these military metaphors offer creative inspiration to help academics and practitioners theorise CP in richer, more reflective and more balanced and complementary ways. An appreciation of both metaphors is likely to favour the use of hybrid strategies comprising SD and HM elements, which may provide the best HRM solutions to CP for the same reasons as the military now considers parallel hybrid solutions optimal for combating terrorist and guerrilla insurgency.

Keywords

HRM strategy Corporate psychopathy Metaphor Machiavellianism Narcissism The dark triad 

References

  1. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. (2007). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the Walk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 174–193.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the preparation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basham, B. (2011). Beware corporate psychopaths—they are still occupying positions of power. www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/brian-basham. Accessed Dec 6, 2013.
  6. Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: a study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, M. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2007). To be or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson, M. J., & Hogan, R. (2008). How dark side leadership personality destroys trust and degrades organizational effectiveness. Organisations and People, 15, 10–18.Google Scholar
  9. Boddy, C. R. (2005). The implications of corporate psychopaths for business and society: An initial examination and a call to arms. Australasian Journal for Business and Behavioural Sciences, 1, 30–40.Google Scholar
  10. Boddy, C. R. (2011a). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boddy, C. R. (2011b). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boddy, C. R. (2012). Some British reactions to the corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, 11–13th September, Cardiff University, Wales.Google Scholar
  13. Boddy, C. R., Laydshewsky, R., & Galvin, P. (2010). Leaders without ethics in global business: Corporate psychopaths. Journal of Public Affairs, 10, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2008). Strategy and human resource management (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cacciaguidi-Fahy, S., & Cunningham, J. (2007). The use of strategic metaphors in intercultural communication. Managing Global Transitions, 5(2), 133–155.Google Scholar
  17. Capstick, M. (2007). The civil–military effort in Afghanistan. Strategic Perspective, 10, 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, J. (2005). Working with monsters: How to identify and protect yourself from the workplace psychopath. Sydney: Random House Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Cleckley, H. M. (1941). The mask of sanity: An attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. London: Henry Kimpton.Google Scholar
  20. Cragin, K. (2007). ‘Understanding terrorist ideology’, testimony presented before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Washington, DC, 12 June 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Elle, K. (2012). Metaphorical management: Using intuition and creativity as a guiding mechanism for complex systems. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleenor, J. W., & Prince, J. M. (1997). Using 360-degree feedback in organizations: An annotated bibliography. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  23. Freud, S. (1910). “Wild” psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 11, 219–227.Google Scholar
  24. Furnham, A., & Taylor, J. (2011). Bad apples: Identify, prevent and manage negative behaviour at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 32–58.Google Scholar
  26. Giacalone, R., & Promislo, M. (2013). Broken when entering: The stigmatization of goodness and business ethics education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12(1), 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grinter, L. E. (1975). How they lost: Doctrines, strategies and outcomes of the Vietnam War. Asian Survey, 15, 1114–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haesli, A., & Boxall, P. (2005). When knowledge management meets HR strategy: An exploration of personalization-retention and codification-recruitment configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1955–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hills, A. (2002). Hearts and minds or search and destroy? Controlling civilians in urban operations. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 13, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan, R. E., & Paulus, C. J. (1994). Enhancing 360-degree feedback for senior executives. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  34. Kaufman, B. E. (2010). A theory of the firm’s demand for HRM practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelman, H. G. (1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Sciences, 29, 25–61.Google Scholar
  36. Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, H. O., & Hsing, C. (2010). Changes in dispositional empathy in american college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 1–19.Google Scholar
  37. Konzelmann, S., Conway, N., Trenberth, L., & Wilkinson, F. (2006). Corporate governance and human resource management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1983, 1995). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Langbert, M. B. (2010). Managing psychopathic employees. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved Dec 6, 2013 from Cornell University, ILR School Site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/chrr/1.
  40. Lee, I. B. (2005). Is there a cure for corporate “psychopathy”? American Business Law Journal, 42, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2012). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the dark triad and honesty-humility. European Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1002/per.1860.
  42. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalised population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32, 991–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall, A., Baden, D., & Guidi, M. (2013). Can an ethical revival of prudence within prudential regulation tackle corporate psychopathy? Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marshall, A., Telofski, R., Ojiako, U., & Chipulu, M. (2012). An examination of “irregular competition” between corporations and NGOs. Voluntas, 23, 371–391.Google Scholar
  46. Martin, G., & Gollan, P. J. (2012). Corporate governance and strategic human resources management in the UK financial services sector: The case of RBS. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3295–3314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mathieu, C., Hare, R. D., Jones, D. N., Babiak, P., & Neumann, C. S. (2013). Facto structure of the B-Scan 360: A measure of corporate psychopathy. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morse, G. (2004). Executive psychopaths. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 20–22.Google Scholar
  50. Nevins, J. L., Bearden, W. O., & Money, B. (2007). Ethical values and long term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ojiako, U., Johnson, J. E. V., Chipulu, C., & Marshall, A. (2010). Unconventional competition—drawing lessons from the military. Prometheus, 28, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ojiako, U., Marshall, A., Luke, M., & Chipulu, C. (2012). Managing competition risk: A critical realist philosophical exploration. Competition & Change, 16, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Owen, D., & Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the last 100 years. Brain, 132, 1396–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pech, R. J., & Slade, B. W. (2007). Organisational sociopaths: Rarely challenged, often promoted. Why? Society and Business Review, 2, 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perkel, S.E. (2005). Book review: Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. In B. Kellerman (Ed.), Consulting to management (Vol. 16, pp. 59–61).Google Scholar
  56. Pinder, C. C., & Bourgeois, V. W. (1982). Controlling tropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Probst, T. M. (2003). Exploring employee outcomes of organizational restructuring: A Solomon four-group study. Group and Organization Management, 28, 416–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ray, J. V., & Jones, S. (2011). Self-reported psychopathic traits and their relation to intentions to engage in environmental offending. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(3), 370–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business, 59, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ronson, J. (2011). The psychopath test. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  61. Russell, G. (2011). Psychiatry and politicians: The “hubris syndrome”. The Psychiatrist, 35, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salekin, R. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sankowsky, D. (1995). The Charismatic Leader as a Narcissist: understanding the abuse of power. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schouten, R., & Silver, J. (2012). Almost a psychopath: do i (or does someone i know) have a problem with manipulation and lack of empathy?. USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209746109.
  66. Stubbs, R. (2004). Hearts and minds in Guerilla warfare: The Malayan emergency 1948-1960. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sutton, R. I. (2010). Good boss, bad boss: How to be the best and learn from the worst. New York: Business Plus; Hatchett Book Group.Google Scholar
  68. The Corporation. (2003). Directed by Jennifer Abbott and Mark Achbar. USA: Big Picture Media Corporation. [Documentary].Google Scholar
  69. Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, A. (2010). Managing business ethics. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Tyrer, P. (2004). New approaches to the diagnosis of psychopathy and personality disorder. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vukotich, G. (2010). The 360° process. OD Practitioner, 42(3), 24–29.Google Scholar
  72. Wellons, S. (2012). The devil in the boardroom: Corporate psychopaths and their impact on business, PURE Insights, 1(Iss. 1), Article 9. Online article at: http://digitalcommons.wou.edu/pure/vol1/iss1/9. Accessed Dec 6, 2013.
  73. Williams, K. M., & Paulhus, D. L. (2004). Factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale (SRP-II) in non-forensic samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson, P. E. (1993). The fiction of corporate scapegoating. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 779–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wood, D. (2011). Counterinsurgency strategy not working in Afghanistan, Critics Say. 11/01/11. Online article at www.politicsdaily.com. Accessed Dec 6, 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alasdair J. Marshall
    • 1
  • Melanie J. Ashleigh
    • 1
  • Denise Baden
    • 1
  • Udechukwu Ojiako
    • 2
  • Marco G. D. Guidi
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of ManagementUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Adam Smith Business SchoolUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations