Legislating a Woman’s Seat on the Board: Institutional Factors Driving Gender Quotas for Boards of Directors
- 6.2k Downloads
Ten countries have established quotas for female representation on publicly traded corporate and/or state-owned enterprise boards of directors, ranging from 33 to 50 %, with various sanctions. Fifteen other countries have introduced non-binding gender quotas in their corporate governance codes enforcing a “comply or explain” principle. Countless other countries’ leaders and policy groups are in the process of debating, developing, and approving legislation around gender quotas in boards. Taken together, gender quota legislation significantly impacts the composition of boards of directors and thus the strategic direction of these publicly traded and state-owned enterprises. This article outlines an integrated model of three institutional factors that explain the establishment of board of directors gender quota legislation based on the premise that the country’s institutional environment co-evolves with gender corporate policies. We argue that these three key institutional factors are female labor market and gendered welfare state provisions, left-leaning political government coalitions, and path-dependent policy initiatives for gender equality, both in the public realm as well as in the corporate domain. We discuss implications of our conceptual model and empirical findings for theory, practice, policy, and future research. These include the adoption and penalty design of board diversity practices into corporate practices, bottom-up approaches from firm to country-level gender board initiatives, hard versus soft regulation, the leading role of Norway and its isomorphic effects, the likelihood of engaging in decoupling, the role of business leaders, and the transnational and international reaction to board diversity initiatives.
KeywordsCorporate governance Gender equality Board gender codes Board gender quotas Welfare state Left-leaning political coalitions Path dependency Publicly traded firms State-owned enterprises
We are grateful to Section Editor Professor Thomas Clarke, the five reviewers, Miguel Glatzer, and Siri Øyslebø Sørensen for their comments on earlier versions. We also thank the policy makers involved in this legislation in Sweden, Norway, and Iceland for acting as our sounding board.
- Adams, R. B., & Kirchmeier, T. (2013). Making it to the top: From female labor force participation to boardroom gender diversity. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Aguilera, R. V., Desdender, K., & Kabbach de Castro, L. R. (2012). A bundle perspective to comparative corporate governance. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), Sage handbook of corporate governance. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Aguilera, R. V., Goyer, M., & Kabbach de Castro, L. R. (2013). Regulation and comparative corporate governance regulation. In M. Wright, D. S. Siegel, K. Keasey, & I. Filatotchev (Eds.), Handbook of corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 365–447.Google Scholar
- Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
- Bøhren, Ø. and Staubo, S. (2013). Changing organizational form to avoid regulatory constraints: The effect of mandatory gender balance in the boardroom. Journal of Corporate Finance, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Borre, O., & Scarbrough, E. (1995). The scope of government (Beliefs in government series). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Branson, D. M. (2012). An Australian perspective on a global phenomenon: Initiatives to place women on corporate boards of directors. Legal Studies Research Paper Series.Google Scholar
- Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2007). Why welfare states persist: The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Current employment statistics. http://www.bls.gov/ces/. Retrieved Aug 4.
- Catalyst. (2013). Quick take: Women on boards. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
- Clark, N. (2010). Goal at Deutsche Telecom: More women as managers. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/business/global/16quota.html.
- Crouch, C. (2001). Welfare state regimes and industrial relations systems: The questionable role of path dependency theory. In B. Ebbingshaus & P. Manow (Eds.), Comparing welfare capitalism: Social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan and the USA (pp. 105–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dagens Næringsliv. (2002). Gabrielsens kvinner. 8/4.Google Scholar
- Dahlerup, D. (2006). Women, quotas and politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
- Davies (of Abersoch), L. (2011). Women on boards. (The Davies report.) London, UK government.Google Scholar
- Davies (of Abersoch), L. (2013). Women on boards. Second progress report. London, UK government.Google Scholar
- Economist. (2011a, July 21). Still lonely at the top. The Economist.Google Scholar
- Economist. (2011b, July 21). The wrong way to promote women. The Economist.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2011). The quota-instrument: Different approaches across Europe. Working paper.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2012). Women in economic decision-making in the EU: Progress report. A Europe 2020 initiative. European Union.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2013). Women and men in leadership positions in the European Union 2013: A review of the situation and recent progress. European Union.Google Scholar
- European Corporate Governance Institute. (2013). http://www.ecgi.org/. Retrieved June 2.
- Eurostat. (2012). Key data on education. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/publication?p_product_code=978-92-9201-242-7. Retrieved May 23.
- Freidenvall, L., Dahlerup, D., & Skjeie, H. (2006). The Nordic countries: An incremental model. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (Vol. 10). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Gladman, K. & Lamb, M. (2012). GMI ratings’ women on boards survey.Google Scholar
- González Menéndez, M. C., & Martínez González, L. (2012). Spain on the Norwegian pathway: Towards a gender-balanced presence of women on corporate boards. In C. Fagan, M. C. González Menéndez, & S. Gómez Anson (Eds.), Women on corporate boards and in top management: European trends and policy (pp. 169–197). Chippenham, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Government Administration Services. (2011). [Prime Minister] Kjell Magne Bondevik’s second government. Oslo, Norway. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/the-government/previous-governments.html?id=85847. Retrieved Aug 8.
- Government of the Netherlands. (2007). Coalition agreement. http://www.government.nl/Government/Previous_governments/Balkenende_IV_Government/Coalition_agreement. Retrieved May 9.
- Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Huse, M. (2011). The golden skirts: Changes in board composition following gender quotas on corporate boards. In Australian and New Zealand Academy Meeting, Wellington, NZ Google Scholar
- Imbeau, L., Petry, F., & Lamari, M. (2001). Left-right party ideology and government policies: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 40(5), 1–29.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Japan Times. (2013). Aeon sets 50 % female manager goal. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/05/18/business/aeon-sets-50-female-manager-goal/#.UcR1MNj4JIM.
- Kanter, J. (2012, October 23). Europe postpones vote on gender quota plan. New York Times.Google Scholar
- Krook, M. L. (2010). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Levi, M. (1997). A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. In A. S. Zuckerman & M. I. Lichbach (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (1987). Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account. In G. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure (pp. 12–37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Molina, Ó., & Rhodes, M. (2007). The political economy of adjustment in mixed market economies: A study of Spain and Italy. In B. Hancke, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nellie McClung Foundation. (2013). History of women’s rights [in Canada and Québec]. http://www.ournellie.com/womens-suffrage/history-of-womens-rights. Retrieved July 16.
- OECD. (2006). Early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing: Paris. http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/37425999.pdf. Retrieved July 24.
- Ostensen Noss, C. (2006). Gender equality in Norway. Strasbourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Pande, R. & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background paper for the World Development Report.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. (1959). Voting and the equilibrium of American political system. In E. Burdick & A. J. Brodbeck (Eds.), American voting behavior (pp. 80–120). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Peacock, L. (2012). Compulsory women on boards quota for Dubai. Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-business/9733465/Compulsory-women-on-boards-quotas-for-Dubai.html. Retrieved June 29.
- Reding, V. (2012). The route to more women on supervisory boards: an intelligent quota instead of inflexible requirement. Speech to the European Commission. November 27.Google Scholar
- Regierung Online. (2011). Der Ausbau der Kinderbetreuung geht voran. http://www.bundesregierung.de/nn_1272/Content/DE/Artikel-/2011/05/2011-05-17-zwischenbericht-kinderf_C3_B6rderungsgesetz.html. Retrieved March 6.
- Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Sørensen, S. Ø. (2011). Statsfeminismen møter næringslivet: Om bakgrunnen og gjennombruddet for kjønnskvotering i bedriftsstyrer som politisk reform. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, 2, 102–119.Google Scholar
- Stepstone. (2011). Frauenquote unerwünscht (survey). http://www.stepstone.de/Ueber-StepStone/presse/frauenquote-unerwuenscht.cfm.
- Storvik, A., & Teigen, M. (2010). Women on board: The Norwegian experience. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation.Google Scholar
- Terjesen, S., Hessels, J. and Li, D. (2013). Comparative international entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206313486259AQ35.
- Trautman, L. (2012). Board diversity: Why it matters. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2047750. Retrieved Dec 24.
- Traxler, F., Blaschke, S., & Kittel, B. (2001). National labour relations in internationalized markets: A comparative study of institutions, change and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Valiente, C. (1997). State feminism and gender equality policies: The case of Spain (1983–1995). In F. Gardiner (Ed.), Sex equality policy in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Voorhis, R. A. (2002) Different types of welfare states? A methodological deconstruction of comparative research. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29(4), 3–18.Google Scholar
- Vasudeva, G. (2013). Weaving together the normative and regulative roles of government: How the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund’s responsible conduct is shaping firms’ cross-border investments. Organization Science, 24(6), 1662–1682.Google Scholar
- Wikigender. (2013). Gender Equality. http://www.wikigender.org/index.php/New_Home. Retrieved Nov 28.