Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 134, Issue 1, pp 29–44 | Cite as

Giving the Gift of Goodness: An Exploration of Socially Responsible Gift-Giving

Article

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that consumers support firms’ CSR activities, and increasingly demand socially responsible products and services. However, an implicit assumption in the extant literature is that the purchaser and the consumer of the product are the same person. The current research focuses on a unique form of socially responsible consumption behavior: gift-giving. Through 30 depth consumer interviews, we develop a typology of consumers based on whether consumers integrate CSR-related information into purchases, and whether the purchases are for themselves or for others (i.e., gifts). We find that in some instances, consumers actively avoid purchasing products from socially responsible organizations and do so with the intention of managing their impressions with the gift recipient. This is counter to previous research that suggests consumers often choose to make socially responsible consumption decisions in efforts to satisfy self-presentation concerns. In addition, the decision to engage in socially responsible consumption for oneself but not for others was motivated by a variety of factors including the role of the recipient and a concern over the credibility of socially responsible gifts. Finally, some participants who do not incorporate CSR into their own personal consumption chose gifts based on a variety of CSR activities in an effort to build awareness for socially responsible organizations.

Keywords

Consumer behavior Corporate social responsibility Gift-giving Interviews Qualitative 

References

  1. Arnold, S. J., Handelman, J. M., & Tigert, D. J. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage. Journal of Business Research, 35, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer responses to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basil, D. Z., & Weber, D. (2006). Values motivation and concern for appearances: The effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R. W. (1982). Effects of gift-giving involvement on gift selection strategies. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belk, R. W. (1984). Cultural and historical differences in concepts of self and their effects on attitudes toward having and giving. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 754–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brunk, K. H. (2010). Reputation building: Beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matters in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  14. Cone Inc. (2012). 2012 Cone Communications Holiday Trend Tracker, “Consumers unsure if holiday causes promotions are naughty or nice,” Retrieved October 20, 2013 from http://www.conecomm.com/2012-cone-holiday-trend-tracker.
  15. Cone Inc. (2013). 2013 Cone Communications/Echo Global CSR Study. Retrieved May 25, 2013 from http://www.conecomm.com/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/fdf8ac4a95f78de426c2cb117656b846/files/2013_cone_communicationsecho_global_csr_study.pdf.
  16. Creyer, E., & Ross, W. T, Jr. (1996). The impact of corporate behaviour on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 28, 47–52.Google Scholar
  19. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotel rooms. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grau, S. L., Garretson, J. A., & Pirsch, J. (2007). Cause related marketing: An exploratory study of campaign donation structures issues. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregory-Smith, D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2013). Emotions and dissonance in “ethical” consumption choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11/12), 1201–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griskevicius, V., Van den Bergh, B., & Tybur, J. M. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guest, G., Bruce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haanaes, K., Balagopal, B., Kong, M. T., Velken, I., Arthur, D., Hopkins, M. S., et al. (2011). New sustainability study: The “embracers” seize advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 23–35.Google Scholar
  29. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(2), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hollenbeck, C. R., Peters, C., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Gift-giving: A community paradigm. Psychology and Marketing, 23(7), 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review two-component model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 34–47.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative roadmap. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3–28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Mills, P. K., & Margulies, N. (1980). Toward a core typology of service organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 255–265.Google Scholar
  35. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do customers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Retail Foundation. (2013). Retrieved October 20, 2013 from http://www.nrf.com/modules.php?name=Pages&sp_id=1140.
  38. Oberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR? A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Otnes, C., Lowrey, T. M., & Kim, Y. C. (1993). Gift selection for easy and difficult recipients: A social roles interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parsons, A. G. (2002). Brand choice in gift-giving: Recipient influence. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(4), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peattie, K. (2001). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Myth, legend, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Marketing Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peloza, J., Loock, M., Cerruti, J., & Muyot, M. (2012). Sustainability: How stakeholder perceptions differ from corporate reality. California Management Review, 55(2), 74–97.Google Scholar
  44. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz, B. (1967). The social psychology of the gift. American Journal of Sociology, 73(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Segev, R., Shoham, A., & Ruvio, A. (2012). What does this gift say about me, you and us? The role of adolescents’ gift-giving in managing their impressions among their peers. Psychology and Marketing, 29(10), 752–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sherry, J. F., & McGrath, M. A. (1989). Unpacking the holiday presence: A comparative ethnography of the gift store. In E. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretive consumer research (pp. 148–167). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  50. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. G. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomsen, T. U., & Sørensen, E. B. (2006). The first four-wheeled status symbol: Pram consumption as a vehicle for the construction of motherhood identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 907–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valor, C. (2008). Can consumers buy responsibly? Analysis and solutions for market failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: Gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.Google Scholar
  60. White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-Benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Gilly, M. C. (1996). An experiential investigation of self-symbolism in gifts. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 458–462.Google Scholar
  62. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Bozok, B. (2006). Drawing inferences about others on the basis of corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goodman School of BusinessBrock UniversitySt. CatherinesCanada
  2. 2.Stirling Management SchoolUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  3. 3.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations