Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 385–397 | Cite as

Business Ethics After Citizens United: A Contractualist Analysis

Article

Abstract

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), the US Supreme Court sharply curtailed the ability of the state to limit political speech by for-profit corporations. This new legal situation elevates the question of corporate political involvement: in what manner and to what extent is it ethical for for-profit corporations to participate in the political process in a liberal democratic society? Using Scanlon’s version of contractualism, I argue for a number of substantive and procedural constraints on the political activities of businesses. Central to this contractualist analysis is (1) an identification of the self-governance-based interests of individuals that are affected by corporate political activity and (2) a method for judging the various assignments of social rights, duties and roles according to how they collectively meet those interests. Together, these two features make this contractualist approach distinctive and allow it to generate substantive ethical results.

Keywords

Business ethics Policy Contractualism 

References

  1. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, (1990). 494 U.S. 652.Google Scholar
  2. Beitz, C. (1990). Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brudney, V. (1981). Business corporations and stockholders’ rights under the first amendment. The Yale Law Journal, 91(2), 235–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, A. (1985). Ethics, efficiency, and the market. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Christiano, T. (1996). The rule of the many. Boulder: West view Press.Google Scholar
  6. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. (2010). 558 U.S. 310.Google Scholar
  7. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, L., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2013). How business fares in the supreme court. Minnesota Law Review, 97(5), 1431–1472.Google Scholar
  10. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti. (1978). 435 U.S. 765.Google Scholar
  11. Fleischacker, S. (2005). On Adam smith’s wealth of nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, R. E. (2006). Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation (1998) reprinted in Ethical Issues in Business: A philosophical approach. Donaldson and Werhane (eds). 7th edition, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
  13. Gowri, A. (1998). Speech and spending: Corporate political speech rights under the first amendment. Journal of Business Ethics. D 98; 17(16): 1835–1860.Google Scholar
  14. Hsieh, N. (2009). Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussain, W. (2012). Is ethical consumerism an impermissible form of vigilantism? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(2), 111–143.Google Scholar
  16. Kumar, R. (1999). Defending the moral moderate: Contractualism and common sense. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 28(4), 275–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar, R. (2001). Contractualism on saving the many. Analysis, 61(270), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mufson, S. (2007). Exxon mobil warming up to global climate issue. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  19. Néron, P., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship, inc.: Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rosen, J. (2008) Supreme Court, Inc. in the March 16, 2008 The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  22. Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Scanlon, T. M. (2003). The diversity of objections to inequality. In The difficulty of tolerance: Essays in political philosophy. Cambridge, pp. 202–218.Google Scholar
  24. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility: Business and society seen from a Haber Asian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silver, D. (2012). Citizens as Contractualist Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations.Google Scholar
  27. van Oosterhout, J. (Hans). (2008). Transcending the confines of economic and political organization: The misguided metaphor of corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 35–42.Google Scholar
  28. Weber, L. (1997). Ethics and the political activity of business: Reviewing the Agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werhane, P. (1985). Persons, rights, & corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research Agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair in Business and Professional Ethics, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, The Sauder School of BusinessThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations