Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 128, Issue 4, pp 803–816 | Cite as

The Neglected Ethical and Spiritual Motivations in the Workplace

  • Manuel Guillén
  • Ignacio Ferrero
  • W. Michael Hoffman
Article

Abstract

Understanding what motivates employees is essential to the success of organizational objectives. Therefore, properly capturing and explaining the full range of such motivations are important. However, the classical and most popular theories describing employee motives have neglected, if not omitted entirely, the importance of the ethical and spiritual dimensions of motivation. This has led to a model of a person as self-interested, amoral, and non-spiritual. In this paper, we attempt to expose this omission and offer a more complete taxonomy of motivations which include these dimensions. Although more work will need to be done to fully develop the ethical and spiritual dimensions of motivation, the expanded taxonomy will provide the foundations and serve as a guide for such further research. Furthermore, this new categorization of motivations brings out the full dimensions of being human, which promises to lead to improved management practices with regard to employees and foster greater human flourishing in the workplace.

Keywords

Ethical motivations Flourishing in the workplace Human motivation taxonomy Motivations in the workplace Religious motivations and spiritual motivations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Juan Nunez for his comment on the first version of this paper, presented by Professor Guillén at the Harvard University Real Colegio Complutense (RCC), in September 2011, with the title “Human motivations: are they really human?”. This first version did not include spiritual and religious motivations. The final draft is the result of many hours of cooperation and work among the three authors, and it would not have been possible without the stimulating support of the staff of the Center for Business Ethics (CBE) at Bentley University. The authors would also like to give special thanks to the members of the Institute for Ethics in Communication and Organizations (IECO) at the University of Valencia, for their suggestions and inestimable help. IECO and CBE are official partner organizations. As a way of giving thanks, the authors agree on calling this taxonomy: "The IECO Matrix of Motivations."

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 231–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Argandoña, A. (2011). Beyond contracts. Love in firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aristotle. (1934). Nicomachean ethics. H. Rackham (Trad.). Vol. 19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Arnsperger, C. (2000). Methodological altruism as an alternative foundation for individual optimization. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(2), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aronson, E. (1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ashmos, D. P., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: a conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Azevedo, R. E., & Akdere, M. (2011). Examining agency theory in training & development: Understanding self-interest behaviors in the organization. Human Resource Development Review, 10(4), 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bañón, A. J., Guillén, M., & Gil, I. (2012). Ethics and learning organizations in the New Economy. In Human resource management in the digital economy: Creating synergy between competency models and information. IGI Global (Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA).Google Scholar
  15. Beadle, R., & Knight, K. (2012). Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benefiel, M. (2005). Soul at work: Spiritual leadership in organizations. New York: Seabury Books.Google Scholar
  17. Benkler, Y. (2011). The unselfish gene. Harvard Business Review, (July/August), 89 (7–8), pp. 67–75.Google Scholar
  18. Bruce, W. (1999). Spirituality in public service: A dialogue. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavanagh, G. F., & Bandsuch, M. R. (2002). Virtue as a benchmark for spirituality in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1–2), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clough, W. R. (2006). To be loved and to love. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  21. Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2012). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.Google Scholar
  22. De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. The Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delbecq, A. L. (1999). Christian spirituality and contemporary business leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(4), 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doherty, W. J. (1995). Soul searching: Why psychotherapy must promote moral responsibility. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fagley, N. S., & Adler, M. G. (2012). Appreciation: A spiritual path to finding value and meaning in the workplace. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 9(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faldetta, G. (2011). The logic of gift and gratuitousness in business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(Supl.), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flynn, F. J., & Brockner, J. (2003). It’s different to give than to receive: Predictors of givers’ and receivers’ reactions to favor exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1034–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Folger, R., & Salvador, R. (2008). Is management theory too “Self-ish”? Journal of Management, 34(6), 1127–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frankl, V. E. (1966). Self-transcendence as a human phenomenon. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2011). ‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the existential gift in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fry, L. W., & Nisiewizc, M. S. (2013). Maximizing the triple bottom line through spiritual leadership. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2008). Philosophical foundations of workplace spirituality: A critical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grant, A. M. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grant, A. M. (2012). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2012). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why and how making a difference makes a difference. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press, pp. 28–44.Google Scholar
  40. Grant, A. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 898–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46, 53–62.Google Scholar
  43. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahn, M. B., & Sheikh, N. N. (2012). Human resource development, motivation and Islam. Journal of Management Development, 31(10), 1021–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. King, S. (2006). The moral manager. Public Integrity, 8(2), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kreeft, P. (1990). A summa of the summa. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  48. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1979). Goal setting—a motivational technique that works. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lersch, Ph. (1938). Aufbau der person. München, Barth. (in German).Google Scholar
  51. Li, J. (2012). Philosophy, training and spirituality: A longitudinal, empirical study. Chinese Management Studies, 6(4), 582–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maclntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  53. Maslow, A. (1943). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  54. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  55. Maslow, A. (1971). The further reaches of human nature. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  56. Max-Neef, M. (1987). Human scale development. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
  57. McClelland, D. C. (1962). Business, drive and national achievement. Harvard Business Review, 40, 99–112.Google Scholar
  58. McCullough, M. E., & Snyder, C. R. (2001). Classical sources of human strength: Revisiting an old home and building a new one. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of the humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mitchell, M. S., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). The managerial relevance of ethical efficacy. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality (pp. 89–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Mitroff, I., & Denton, E. A. (1999). A study of spirituality in the workplace. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 83–94.Google Scholar
  62. O’Connor, D., & Yballe, L. (2007). Maslow revisited: Construction a road map of human nature. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 738–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pargament, K. L., & Mahoney, A. (2002). Spirituality: Discovering and conserving the sacred. In R. A. Giacalone & C. L. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 646–659). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  64. Pérez-López, J. A. (1993). Fundamentos de la dirección de empresas. Madrid: Rialp.Google Scholar
  65. Petchsawang, P., & Duchon, D. (2012). Workplace spirituality, meditation, and work performance. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 9(2), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37–48.Google Scholar
  67. Rubenstein, R. L. (1987). Spirit matters: The worldwide impact of religion on contemporary politics. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  68. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sen, A. K. (1997). On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Sheldrake, P. (2007). A brief history of spirituality. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, H. (2000). Why religion matters: The fate of the human spirit in an age of disbelief. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  74. Tepper, B. J. (2003). Organizational citizenship behavior and the spiritual employee. In R. A. Giacalone & C. L. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 181–190). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  75. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Guillén
    • 1
  • Ignacio Ferrero
    • 2
  • W. Michael Hoffman
    • 3
  1. 1.Management DepartmentUniversity of Valencia School of Economics and IECOValenciaSpain
  2. 2.School of EconomicsUniversity of Navarra Campus UniversitarioPamplonaSpain
  3. 3.Center for Business EthicsBentley University (USA)WalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations