Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 513–529 | Cite as

Does Moral Leadership Enhance Employee Creativity? Employee Identification with Leader and Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) in the Chinese Context

  • Qinxuan Gu
  • Thomas Li-Ping Tang
  • Wan Jiang
Article

Abstract

In this article, drawing from a relational perspective, we explore the relationship between moral leadership and employee creativity, treat employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) as two mediators, and develop a new theoretical model of employee creativity. Our data collected from 160 supervisor–subordinate dyads in the People’s Republic of China demonstrate that moral leadership is positively related to both employee identification with leader and LMX. Further, employee identification with leader partially mediates the relationship between moral leadership and LMX. In particular, employee identification with leader greatly enhances LMX which leads to high creativity. Overall, the relationship between moral leadership and employee creativity is mediated by not only employee identification with leader but also LMX. Our findings offer a new theoretical framework for future theory development and testing on creativity as well as practical implications for researchers and managers in business ethics.

Keywords

Paternalistic leadership Moral leadership Identification with leader Leader–member exchange (LMX) Relational process Confucianism Employee creativity 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for a Grant awarded to the first author (Grant No. 71032003). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We also would like to thank Anne S. Tsui for her insightful comments on the conceptual design of this research.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–377.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630–640.Google Scholar
  6. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment inventory for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  7. Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.Google Scholar
  9. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  10. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2012). Report to the nations: On occupational fraud and abuse. 2012 Global fraud study. Retrieved from http://www.acfe.com/rttn.aspx.
  11. Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264–275.Google Scholar
  12. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.Google Scholar
  13. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (pp. 445–466). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Baker, T. L., Hunt, T. G., & Andrews, M. C. (2006). Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 849–857.Google Scholar
  15. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  16. Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.Google Scholar
  17. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.Google Scholar
  19. Basu, R., & Green, S. G. (1997). Leader–member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477–499.Google Scholar
  20. Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.Google Scholar
  21. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.Google Scholar
  23. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.Google Scholar
  24. Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576.Google Scholar
  25. Chen, C. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Developments in understanding Chinese leadership: Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives. In M. Bond (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 599–622). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Chen, J. Q., Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, N. Y. (2013). Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2.Google Scholar
  27. Chen, Y. J., & Tang, T. L. P. (2006). Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  28. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64.Google Scholar
  29. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89–117.Google Scholar
  30. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  31. Cheung, M. F. Y., & Wu, W. P. (2012). Leader–member exchange and employee work outcomes in Chinese firms: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
  32. Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., & Jen, C. K. (2005). The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  33. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  34. Coleman, J., Gulati, D., & Segovia, W. O. (2012). Passion & purpose: Stories from the best and brightest young business leaders. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  35. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.Google Scholar
  36. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78.Google Scholar
  37. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.Google Scholar
  38. Deluga, R. J. (1992). The relationship of leader–member exchanges with laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership. In K. E. Clark, M. B. Clark, & D. R. Campbell (Eds.), Impact of leadership (pp. 237–247). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  39. Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 622–635.Google Scholar
  40. Dong, B., & Torgler, B. (2013). Causes of corruption: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 26, 152–169.Google Scholar
  41. Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 504–518.Google Scholar
  42. Erben, G. S., & Güneser, A. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 955–968.Google Scholar
  43. Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchange in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader–member exchange theory. In L. I. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership (pp. 65–114). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  44. Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  46. Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Business leadership in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471–488.Google Scholar
  48. Flannery, R. (2013). Inside the 2013 Forbes China 400: A record 168 billionaires. Retrieved October 27, 2013, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2013/10/21/inside-the-2013-forbes-china-400-a-record-168-billionaires/.
  49. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.Google Scholar
  50. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  51. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.Google Scholar
  52. Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L. P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321–338.Google Scholar
  53. Gilmore, P. L., Hu, X. X., Wei, F., Tetrick, L. E., & Zacaro, S. (2013). Positive affectivity neutralizes transformational leadership’s influence on creative performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1061–1075.Google Scholar
  54. Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.Google Scholar
  55. Gong, T. (2012). Double paradox: Rapid growth and rising corruption in China. China Quarterly, 221, 857–858.Google Scholar
  56. Gong, T., & Wu, A. M. (2012). Does increased civil service pay deter corruption? Evidence from China. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), 192–204.Google Scholar
  57. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.Google Scholar
  58. Greenleaf, R. (1970). The servant as leader. Newton Center, MA: Robert K. Greenleaf Center.Google Scholar
  59. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. Y. (2011). Predictors of individual level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105.Google Scholar
  60. Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.Google Scholar
  62. Hirst, G., van Dick, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009a). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 963–982.Google Scholar
  63. Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009b). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293.Google Scholar
  64. Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Cai, C. F., & Zhang, S. (2013). Overearning. Psychological Science, 24(6), 852–859.Google Scholar
  65. Janssen, O., & Huang, X. (2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(1), 69–88.Google Scholar
  66. Javidan, M., & Carl, D. E. (2004). East meets west: A cross-cultural comparison of charismatic leadership among Canadian and Iranian executives. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 665–691.Google Scholar
  67. Josselson, R. (1994). Identity and relatedness in the life cycle. In H. A. Bosma, T. L. G. Graafsma, H. D. Grotevant, & D. J. de Levita (Eds.), Identity and development: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 81–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246–255.Google Scholar
  69. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  70. Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2013). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 292–306.Google Scholar
  71. Lea, S. E. G., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161–209.Google Scholar
  72. Lemrová, S., Reiterová, E., Fatěnová, R., Lemr, K., & Tang, T. L. P. (2013). Money is power: Monetary intelligence—love of money and temptation of materialism among Czech University students. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1915-8.Google Scholar
  73. Li, C. W., Wu, K., Johnson, D. E., & Wu, M. (2012). Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
  74. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.Google Scholar
  75. Liu, S. (2003). Cultures within culture: Unity and diversity of two generations of employees in state-owned enterprises. Human Relations, 56(4), 387–417.Google Scholar
  76. Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader–member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561–577.Google Scholar
  77. Malhotra, D., & Gino, F. (2011). The pursuit of power corrupts: Investing in outside options motivates opportunism in relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 559–592.Google Scholar
  78. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  79. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  80. McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  81. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.Google Scholar
  82. Milton, C. L. (2009). Transparency in nursing leadership: A chosen ethic. Nursing Science Quarterly, 22(1), 23–26.Google Scholar
  83. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.Google Scholar
  84. Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  85. Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 148–157.Google Scholar
  86. O’Reilly, C. A., Main, B. G., & Crystal, G. S. (1988). CEO compensation as tournament and social-comparison: A tale of 2 theories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  87. Olsson, L., Hemlin, S., & Pousette, A. (2012). A multi-level analysis of leader–member exchange and creative performance in research groups. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 604–619.Google Scholar
  88. Ötken, A. B., & Cenkci, T. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 525–536.Google Scholar
  89. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2009). Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 405–420.Google Scholar
  90. Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.Google Scholar
  91. Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
  92. Piffa, P. K., Stancatoa, D. M., Côtéb, S., Mendoza-Dentona, R., & Keltnera, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the United States of America (PNAS), 109(11), 4086–4091.Google Scholar
  93. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
  94. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.Google Scholar
  95. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  96. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  97. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  98. Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429–437.Google Scholar
  99. Rego, A., Vitoria, A., Magalhaes, A., Ribeiro, N., & Cunha, M. P. E.   (2013). Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 61–79.Google Scholar
  100. Sebastian, C. S., Zhang, X., & Tian, P. (2013). For the good or the bad? Interactive effects of transformational leadership with moral and authoritarian leadership behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 629–640.Google Scholar
  101. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
  102. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 387–409.Google Scholar
  103. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714.Google Scholar
  104. Simola, S. K., Barlin, J., & Turner, N. (2010). Transformational leadership and leader moral orientation: Contrasting an ethic of justice and an ethic of care. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 179–188.Google Scholar
  105. Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & Parks, J. M. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 650–665.Google Scholar
  106. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
  107. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19(6), 807–823.Google Scholar
  108. Sosik, J. J., Juzbasich, J., & Chun, J. U. (2011). Effects of moral reasoning and management level on ratings of charismatic leadership, in-role and extra-role performance of managers: A multi-source examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 434–450.Google Scholar
  109. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual-differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.Google Scholar
  110. Staw, B. M., & Barsade, S. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 304–331.Google Scholar
  111. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180.Google Scholar
  112. Sue-Chan, C., Au, A. K., & Hackett, R. D. (2012). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 459–468.Google Scholar
  113. Tang, T. L. P. (1996). Pay differentials as a function of rater’s sex, money ethic, and job incumbent’s sex: A test of the Matthew Effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 127–144.Google Scholar
  114. Tang, T. L. P. (2010). From increasing gas efficiency to enhancing creativity: It pays to go green. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 149–155.Google Scholar
  115. Tang, T. L. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Effects of personal values, perceived surveillance, and task labels on task preference: The ideology of turning play into work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 99–105.Google Scholar
  116. Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 13–30.Google Scholar
  117. Tang, T. L. P., & Liu, H. (2012). Love of money and unethical behavior intention: Does an authentic supervisor’s personal integrity and character (ASPIRE) make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 295–312.Google Scholar
  118. Tang, T. L. P., & Sutarso, T. (2013). Falling or not falling into temptation? Multiple faces of temptation, monetary intelligence, and unethical intentions across gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 529–552.Google Scholar
  119. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicia, F., et al. (2011). The love of money is the root of all evil: Pay satisfaction and CPI as moderators. In L. A. Toombs (Ed.), Best paper proceedings of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  120. Tang, T. L. P., Tollison, P. S., & Whiteside, H. D. (1987). The effect of quality circle initiation on motivation to attend quality circle meetings and on task performance. Personnel Psychology, 40, 799–814.Google Scholar
  121. Tang, T. L. P., Tollison, P. S., & Whiteside, H. D. (1989). Quality circle productivity as related to upper-management attendance, circle initiation, and collar color. Journal of Management, 15, 101–113.Google Scholar
  122. Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P., & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 241–269.Google Scholar
  123. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relations. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620.Google Scholar
  124. Tu, Y. D., & Lu, X. X. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441–455.Google Scholar
  125. van Knippenberg, D., van Dick, R., & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457–477.Google Scholar
  126. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825–856.Google Scholar
  127. Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456–465.Google Scholar
  128. Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 153–172.Google Scholar
  129. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.Google Scholar
  130. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D. X., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader–member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420–432.Google Scholar
  131. Wang, P., & Rode, J. C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128.Google Scholar
  132. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Linden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
  133. Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic leadership among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445–480.Google Scholar
  134. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.Google Scholar
  135. Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. (2012). Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 97–121.Google Scholar
  136. Xia, Y., & Tang, T. L. P. (2011). Sustainability in supply chain management: Suggestions for the auto industry. Management Decision, 49(4), 495–512.Google Scholar
  137. Yukl, G. (2001). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  138. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management and Organization Department, Antai College of Economics & ManagementShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Management and Marketing, Jennings A. Jones College of BusinessMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations