The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior
- 3.6k Downloads
The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of leadership and promotion regulatory focus on employees’ willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB; Umphress and Bingham, J Appl. Psychol 95:769–780, 2011). Building from a person–situation interactionist perspective, we investigate the interaction of leadership style and how leaders frame messages, as well as test a three-way interaction with promotion focus. Using an experimental design, we found that inspirational and charismatic transformational leaders elicited higher levels of UPB than transactional leaders when the leaders used loss framing, but not gain framing. Furthermore, followers’ promotion regulatory focus moderated this relationship such that the effect held for followers with low promotion focus, but not for individuals with high promotion focus. Our findings extend the understanding of UPB, offer theoretical mechanisms to explain when this behavior occurs, and contribute to leadership theory and research on ethical decision making.
KeywordsFraming Transactional leadership Transformational leadership Promotion regulatory focus Unethical pro-organizational behavior
- Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
- Barger, P., Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., & Sinar, E. F. (2011). I-O and the crowd: Frequently asked questions about using Mechanical Turk for research. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 49. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/tip/oct11/03barger.aspx.
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire for research. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
- Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. J., & Lord, R. G. (2001). Leadership and perceiver cognition: Moving beyond first order constructs. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 181–202). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Conger, J. A. (1989). The charismatic leader: Behind the ourstique of exceptional leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252–284.Google Scholar
- Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., & Gurt, J. (2013). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z.
- Howell, J. P., Dorfman, P. W., & Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 88–102.Google Scholar
- Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Xu, L. (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects? Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 641–653.Google Scholar
- Palazzolo, J. (2011, November 14). Alleged victims considering lawsuit against Penn State. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/11/14/alleged-victims-considering-lawsuits-against-penn-state/.
- Piccolo, R. F. (2005). Transformational leadership and follower risk behavior: An examination of framing and issue interpretation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 3, 601–617.Google Scholar
- Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar