Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 35–46 | Cite as

Behavioral Factors Affecting Students’ Intentions to Enroll in Business Ethics Courses: A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory Using Self-Identity as a Moderator

Article

Abstract

The current study used both Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior (TPB) and Bandura’s social cognitive theory (SCT) to examine the intentions of business undergraduate students toward taking elective ethics courses and investigated the role of self-identity in this process. The study was prospective in design; data on predictors and intentions were obtained during the first collection of data, whereas the actual behavior was assessed 10 days later. Our results indicated that the TPB was a better predictor of behavioral intentions than was SCT. As expected, self-identity served as a moderator in the relationship between perceived behavioral control and behavioral intentions posited by the TPB and in the relationship between outcome expectancy and behavioral intentions posited by SCT. Self-identity was a crucial factor in predicting actual behavior within both theoretical frameworks.

Keywords

Business ethics education Self-identity Social cognitive theory Theory of planned behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research (NSC 100-2511-S-165-002), and Prof. Wan Chin-Sheng and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (1996). The directive influence of attitudes on behavior. In P. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Psychology of Action (pp. 385–403). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2006). Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker-Eveleth, L., & Stone, R. W. (2008). Expectancy theory and behavioral intentions to use computer applications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, knowledge, and Management, 3, 135–146.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Blanthorne, C., Kovar, S. E., & Fisher, D. G. (2007). Accounting educators’ opinions about ethics in the curriculum: An extensive view. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 355–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brislin, R. W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broadhead-Fearn, D., & White, K. M. (2006). The role of self-efficacy in predicting rule-following behaviors in shelters for homeless youth: A test of the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(3), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cahn, S., & Glas, V. (2011). Teaching business ethics with cases: The effect of personal experience. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
  17. Charng, H. W., Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, S., Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2005). Testing the sufficiency of the theory of planned behavior: A case of customer dissatisfaction responses in restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 24(4), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chung, S. J., & Hoerr, S. L. (2005). Predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes in young adults by gender. Nutrition Research, 25(5), 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. CNA Reporter (2011). DEHP contamination scandal threatens Taiwan’s business rep. CNA daily Report. Retrieved 20 April 2013 from http://www.wantchinatimes.com/.
  21. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (1996). The theory of planned behavior and health behaviors. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behavior (pp. 121–162). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Cook, A. J., Kerr, G. N., & Moore, K. (2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dean, M., Raats, M. M., & Shepherd, R. (2012). The role of self-identity, past behavior, and their interaction in predicting intention to purchase fresh and processed organic food. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  29. Fernando, M. (2011). A social innovation based transformative learning approach to teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8(1), 119–138.Google Scholar
  30. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garaventa, E. (1998). Drama: A tool for teaching business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghaffari, F., Kyriacou, O., & Brennan, R. (2008). Exploring the implementation of ethics in U.K. accounting programs. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Hooker, J. (2004). The case against business ethics education: A study in bad arguments. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 1(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
  37. Kennedy, M. J., & Horn, L. C. (2007). Thoughts on ethics education in the business school environment: An interview with Dr. Jerry Trapnell, AACSB. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirmani, M. N., & Suman, L. N. (2010). Gender differences in alcohol related attitudes and expectancies among college students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 36(1), 19–24.Google Scholar
  39. Klein, E. R. (1998). The one necessary condition for a successful business ethics course: The teacher must be a philosopher. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lan, G., Gowing, M., McMahon, S., Rieger, F., & King, N. (2008). A study of the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning of undergraduate business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lau, C. (2010). A step forward: Ethics education matters! Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin, B. J., & Chiou, W. B. (2010). Undergraduates’ intentions to take a second language proficiency test: A comparison of predicting from the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maddux, J. E. (1991). Self-efficacy. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The healthy perspective (pp. 57–78). Elmsford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Maddux, J. E., & Roger, R. W. (1983). Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maddux, J. E., Sherer, M., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6(2), 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahoney, J. M., & Rood, S. B. (1991). A device for studying the influence of declining water table on poplar growth and survival. Tree Physiology, 8, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behavior. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manstead, A. S. R., & van Eekelen, S. A. M. (1998). Distinguished between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic achievement intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1375–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCall, G., & Simmons, R. (1978). Identities and interactions (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, W. F., & Becker, D. A. (2011). Ethics in the accounting curriculum: What is really being covered? American Journal of Business Education, 4(10), 1–10.Google Scholar
  52. Mintz, S. (2006). Accounting ethics education: Integrating reflective learning and virtue ethics. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(2–3), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mussweiler, T., & Ruter, K. (2003). What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Leary, C. (2009). An empirical analysis of the positive impact of ethics teaching on accountancy students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(4–5), 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petrick, J. A., Cragg, W., & Sañudo, M. (2011). Business ethics in North America: Trends and challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Povey, R., Conner, M., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. (2000). Application of the theory of planned behavior to two dietary behaviors: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prislin, R., & Kovrlija, N. (1992). Predicting behavior of high and low self-monitors: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychological Reports, 70, 1131–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Randall, D. M. (1994). Why students take elective business ethics courses: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rise, J., Sheeran, P., & Hukkelberg, S. (2010). The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(5), 1085–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in strategic management journal: 1996–2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–753.Google Scholar
  61. Sharp, E. H., Coatsworth, J. D., Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Ranieri, S. (2007). Gender differences in the self-defining activities and identity experiences of adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soule, E. (2005). Embedding ethics in business and higher education: From leadership to management imperative. Washington, DC: The Business-Higher Education Forum.Google Scholar
  63. Sparks, P. (2000). Subjective expected utility-based attitude-behavior models: The utility of self-identity. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 31–46). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Sparks, P., & Guthrie, C. A. (1998). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: A useful addition or an unhelpful artifice? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1393–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with ‘green consumerism’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Springer, S.H., Larson, L.M., Tilley, B.P., Gasser, C.E., & Quinn, A.C. (2001). The development of an educational and career outcome expectancy scale. Poster presented at the American Psychological Association National Convention, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  67. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The importance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Palo Alto: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  70. Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Development and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity (pp. 89–103). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Taiwan Ministry of Education (2011). Retrieved 20 Jan 2012 from http://www.edu.tw/index.aspx.
  72. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tiao, M., Lee, S., & Wang, S. (2007). The Rebar Scandal Financial Oversight: Swords against Guns. Common Wealth Magazine, 364. Retrieved 20 April 2013 from http://english.cw.com.tw/.
  76. Tolma, E. L., Reininger, B. M., Evans, A., & Ureda, J. (2006). Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Education & Behavior, 33(2), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tzeng, L., & Wang, Y. (2006). The influence of business ethics courses on the professional ethics value of business school students. Journal of Far East University, 23(4), 263–276.Google Scholar
  79. White, K. M., O’Connor, E. L., & Hamilton, K. (2011). In-group and role identity influences on the initiation and maintenance of student’s voluntary attendance at peer study sessions for statistics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wu, C. F. (2003). A study of the adjustment of ethical recognition and ethical decision-making of managers-to-be across the Taiwan Strait before and after receiving a business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wu, Y. C. J., Huang, S., Kuo, L., & Wu, W. S. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 520–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zebracki, K., & Drotar, D. (2004). Outcome expectancy and self-efficacy in adolescent asthma self-management. Children’s Healthcare, 33(2), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceTainan University of TechnologyTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of International BusinessSouthern Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations