Environmental Leadership and Consciousness Development: A Case Study Among Canadian SMEs
- 1.8k Downloads
The objective of this paper is to explore how the various stages of consciousness development of top managers can influence, in practical terms, their abilities in and commitment to environmental leadership in different types of SMEs. A case study based on 63 interviews carried out in 15 industrial SMEs showed that the organizations that displayed the most environmental management practices were mostly run by managers at a post-conventional stage of consciousness development. Conversely, the SMEs that displayed less sustainable environmental management practices were all run by managers at conventional stages of development. Drawing upon diverse examples of environmental leadership, this paper analyzes the reasons why the stages of post-conventional consciousness development of top managers seem to foster corporate greening in SMEs. The study also sheds light on the key values and abilities associated with both environmental leadership and the upper-stages of consciousness development, which include a broader and systemic perspective, long-range focus, integration of conflicting goals, collaboration with stakeholders, complexity management, collaborative learning, among others.
KeywordsEnvironmental leadership Sustainability Consciousness development Values SMEs Corporate greening
The authors would like to acknowledges financial support received from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada.
- Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. The Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
- Beck, D., & Cowan, C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership, and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brown, B. C. (2011). Conscious leadership for sustainability : How leaders with a late-stage action logic design and engage in sustainability initiatives. Santa Barbara: Fielding Graduate University.Google Scholar
- Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x.
- Cook-Greuter, S. R. (1999). Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
- Dechant, K., Altman, B., Downing, R. M., Keeney, T., Mahoney, M., Swaine, A., et al. (1994). Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage [and executive commentary]. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 8(3), 7–27.Google Scholar
- Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2012). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1333-3.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- Fisher, D., & Torbert, W. (1991). Transforming managerial practice: Beyond the achiever stage. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 143–173.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. The British Journal of Sociology (Vol. 20, p. 227). New York: Aldine de Gruyer.Google Scholar
- Joiner, W. B., & Josephs, S. A. (2007). Leadership agility: Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: the mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Loevinger, J., Wessler, R., & Redmore, C. (1970). Measuring ego development: Vol. 2. Scoring manual. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Pfaffenberger, A. H., Marko, P. W., & Combs, A. (2011). The postconventional personality. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.Google Scholar
- Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (1998). Organizational transformation as a function of CEOs’ developmental stage. Organization Development Journal, 16(1), 11–28.Google Scholar
- Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (2005). Seven transformations of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 66–76.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Strijbos, J. W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 394–404.Google Scholar
- Torbert, W. R., & Livne-Tarandach, R. (2009). Reliability and validity tests of the Harthill leadership development profile in the context of developmental action inquiry. Integral Review, 5(2), 133–151.Google Scholar
- Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar