Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
- 2.4k Downloads
The ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ (Principles) that provide guidance for the implementation of the United Nations’ ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ framework (Framework) will probably succeed in making human rights matters more customary in corporate management procedures. They are likely to contribute to higher levels of accountability and awareness within corporations in respect of the negative impact of business activities on human rights. However, we identify tensions between the idea that the respect of human rights is a perfect moral duty for corporations and the Principle’s ‘human rights due diligence’ requirement. We argue that the effectiveness of the ‘human rights due diligence’ is in many respects dependent upon the moral commitment of corporations. The Principles leave room for an instrumental or strategic implementation of due diligence, which in some cases could result in a depreciation of the fundamental norms they seek to promote. We reveal some limits of pragmatic approaches to coping with business-related human rights abuses. As these limits become more apparent, not only does the case for further progress in international and extraterritorial human rights law become more compelling, but so too does the argument for a more forceful discussion on the moral foundations of human rights duties for corporations.
KeywordsHuman rights Ruggie Principles Corporate responsibility Moral rights Moral duties
- Altschuller, S. A. (2011). Author of UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights Joins Foley Hoag, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Retrieved April 24, 2012 from http://www.csrandthelaw.com/articles/csr-practice/.
- Baer, M. H. (2009). Governing corporate compliance. Boston College Law Review, 50(1), 2009; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 166. Retrieved October 14, 2011 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474291.
- Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR). (2009). The guide for integrating human rights into business management. Retrieved March 30, 2012 from http://www.integrating-humanrights.org/.
- Catá Backer, L. (2011). From institutional misalignments to socially sustainable governance: The guiding principles for the implementation of the United Nation’s ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ and the construction of inter-systemic global governance. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1922953.
- Clapham, A. (2010). Human rights obligations of non-state-actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press (reprint).Google Scholar
- Clapham, A., & Jerbi, S. (2001). Categories of corporate complicity in human rights abuses. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 24, 339–349.Google Scholar
- Damodaran, A. (2007). Strategic risk taking: A framework for risk management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
- Danish Institute for Human Rights. (2006). Human rights compliance assessment quick check. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www.humanrights.dk/what+we+do/focus+areas/human+rights+and+business/tools+and+methods/assessment+tools+for+businesses.
- Dhooge, L. J. (2008). Due diligence as a defense to corporate liability pursuant to the alien tort statute. Emory International Law Review, 22, 456–498.Google Scholar
- Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
- French, P. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Human Rights Watch. (2011). UN Human Rights Council: Weak stance on business standards. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/06/16/un-human-rights-council-weak-stance-business-standards.
- International Federation for Human Rights. (2011). UN Human Rights Council adopts Guiding Principles on business conduct, yet victims still waiting for effective remedies. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www.fidh.org/UN-Human-Rights-Council-adopts.
- Kant, I. (2002). The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (H. J. Payton, Trans.). In L. Pasternak (Ed.), The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals in focus (pp. 17–98). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Laufer, W. S. (2011). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Pieth, M., & Ivory, R. (2011). Emergence and convergence: Corporate criminal liability principles in overview. In M. Pieth & R. Ivory (Eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Vol. 9 (pp. 3–60). Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
- Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- Renouard, C. (2007). La responsabilité éthique des multinationales. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
- Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101, 819–840.Google Scholar
- Ruggie, J. G. (2011). Lecture, Sir Geoffrey Chandler Speaker Series, The Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufacturers and Commerce, 11 January 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/ChandlerLecture_Final.pdf).
- Sherman, J., & Lehr, A. (2010). Human rights due diligence: Is it too risky? Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 55. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_55_shermanlehr.pdf.
- Shue, H. (1996). Basic rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Special Representative of the U.N. Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (SRSG). (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, 20, 74, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (April 7, 2008).Google Scholar
- Spedding, L., & Rose, A. (2008). Business risk management handbook: A sustainable approach. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Taylor, M. B., Zandvliet, L., & Forouhar, M. (2009). Due diligence for human rights: a risk-based approach. Working Paper No. 53, Harvard Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_53_taylor_etal.pdf.
- United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2010). Principled pragmatism: The way forward for business and human rights. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/PrincipledpragmatismBusinessHR.aspx.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2009). Promotion of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the rights to development. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, A/HRC/11/13. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A.HRC.11.13.pdf.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2010). Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the impact of the global economic and financial crises on the realization of all human rights and on possible actions to alleviate it, A/HRC/13/38. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/13session/A-HRC-13-38.pdf.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011a). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework’. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, A/HRC/17/31. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011b). Human rights and corporate law: trends and observations from a cross-national study by the Special Representative. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, A/HRC/17/31/Add.1. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/report-human-rights-and-corporate-law-23-may-2011.pdf.
- Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Initiative. (2012). Implementation guidance tools. Retrieved November 30, 2012 from http://www.voluntaryprinciples.org/files/VPs_IGT_Final_13-09-11.pdf.
- Wenar, L. (2011). ‘Rights’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved April 24, 2012 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/.
- Wettstein, F., & Waddock, S. (2005). Voluntary or mandatory: That is (not) the question—Linking corporate citizenship to human rights obligations for business. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts und Unternehmensethik, 6(3), 304–320.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 77–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Williamson, H. (2011). Conflict zone pressure rises on corporations. In Financial Times, 12 January 2012. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d4530e7a-1e45-11e0-bab6-00144feab49a.html#axzz1t4BRsGM0.