Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 123, Issue 2, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Challengers from Within Economic Institutions: A Second-Class Social Movement? A Response to Déjean, Giamporcaro, Gond, Leca and Penalva-Icher’s Comment on French SRI

  • Diane-Laure ArjalièsEmail author


In a recent comment made about my paper “A Social Movement Perspective on Finance: How Socially Responsible Investment Mattered” (J Bus Ethics 92:57–78, 2010), published in this journal, Déjean, Giamporcaro, Gond, Leca and Penalva-Icher (J Bus Ethics 112:205–212, 2013) strongly criticize the social movement perspective adopted on French SRI. They both contest the empirical analysis of the movement and the possibility for insiders to trigger institutional change towards sustainability. This answer aims to address the different concerns raised throughout their comment and illuminate the differences between both approaches. It first explains why SRI in France can be considered as a social movement, despite not being protest-oriented. It then reflects on the dangers of systematically associating societal change with radical activism. It concludes by elaborating on the importance of acknowledging the potential contribution of reformist movements from within the economic institutions to the enhancement of the social good.


Institutional change Mainstreaming Socially Responsible Investment Social movement 


  1. Arjaliès, D.-L. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arjaliès, D.-L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to formulate and implement CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research. Available on line
  3. Bessire, D., & Onnée, S. (2010). Assessing corporate social performance: Strategies of legitimation and conflicting ideologies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. (1994). A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Déjean, F. (2005). L’Investissement Socialement Responsable: Etude du cas français (Socially responsible investment: A study of the French case). Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
  6. Déjean, F., Giamporcaro, S., Gond, J.-P., Leca, B., & Penalva-Icher, E. (2013). Mistaking an emerging market for a social movement? A comment on Arjaliès’ social-movement perspective on socially responsible investment in France. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Déjean, F., Gond, J.-P., & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57, 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013). A market mediation strategy: How social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political–cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61, 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets. NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giamporcaro-Saunière, S. (2006). L’investissement socialement responsable entre l’offre et la demande: Analyse et enjeux de la construction d’une épargne politique. Paris: René Descartes Paris V University.Google Scholar
  13. Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.Google Scholar
  15. Markowitz, L., Cobb, D., & Hedley, M. (2012). Framing ambiguity: Insider/Outsiders and the Successful Legitimation Project of the Socially Responsible Mutual Fund Industry. Organization, 19, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McAdam, D., & Scott, R. W. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, R. W. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehrpouya, A. (2012). From God to markets: An analysis of the meaning work of boundary actors during the “mainstreaming” of socially responsible investment. HEC Working Paper CR962.Google Scholar
  18. Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Novethic. (2010). Intégration des enjeux ESG: Quelles pratiques pour quels objectifs? Etudes Novethic.Google Scholar
  20. Novethic. (2013). Le marché de l’ISR français en 2012. Etudes Novethic.Google Scholar
  21. Penalva-Icher, E. (2006). La construction sociale d’un marché financier: l’investissement socialement responsable en France. Paper presented at the Second congrès de l’Association Française de Sociologie, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  22. Penalva-Icher, E. (2007). Réseaux et régulation d’un marché financier “socialement responsable”: en attendant la concurrence (Networks and regulation of a financial market “socially responsible”: Waiting for the competition). Lille: Lille 1 University.Google Scholar
  23. Rivoalan, S., & Louvel, Y. (2010). Investissement Socialement Responsable: l’heure du tri.
  24. Shamir, R. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shamir, R. (2005). Mind the gap: The commodification of corporate social responsibility. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and society, 37(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sjostrom, E. (2007). Translating ideologically based concerns: How civil society organisations use the financial market to protect human rights. International Journal of Environmental and Sustainable Development, 6, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Touraine, A. (1969). La société post-industrielle (The Post-industrial Society). Paris: Denoel-Gonthier.Google Scholar
  29. Wade, M. (2005). Good company citizenship: Does governance change the role of companies in society? In U. Petschow, J. Rosenau, & E. U. von Weizsacker (Eds.), Governance and sustainability: New challenges for states, companies and societies (pp. 186–199). Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  30. Zald, M. N., & Berger, P. L. (1978). Social movements in organizations: Coup d’Etat, insurgency, and mass movements. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 823–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accounting and Control DepartmentHEC ParisJouy-en-JosasFrance

Personalised recommendations