Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp 157–170

What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation?

Article

Abstract

This study examines the dimensional consequences of (a) having positive prior corporate associations and (b) negative prior corporate associations in times of product-harm crisis by applying two dimensions of corporate associations (corporate ability vs. corporate social responsibility). The findings indicate that the disadvantages of having negative prior corporate ability (CA) associations are bigger than having negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations in times of product-harm crisis, whereas the advantages of having positive prior CSR associations are bigger than having positive CA associations. This study also provides directions for how to manage reputational strengths and weaknesses prior to a crisis as part of reputation and crisis management.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility associations Corporate ability associations Crisis management Corporate reputation management 

References

  1. Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26 (2), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15 (3), 365–392. doi:10.1177/0265-7598153004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basil, M. D., Brown, W. J., & Bocarnea, M. C. (2002). Differences in univariate values versus multivariate relationships. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 501–514.Google Scholar
  5. Berens, G., van Riel, C., & Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other?. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s1055-006-9232-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71 (April), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, K.N., Wengreen, H.J., Dimmick, M., Eller, K., Frampton, A., Heaton, E.L., Staheli, T., & Christensen, N.K. (2011). Improving diets of college students: Survey of dietary habits and focus group perspectives on how to best teach students. Journal of Health Behavior and Public Health, 1(1), 23–29.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, K. A., & White, C. L.(2011). Organization-Public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1–2), 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20 (1), 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgoon, K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. David, P., Kline, S. & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase Intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17 (3), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson, W., & Worrell, D. (1992). Research notes and communications: The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grunwald, G., & Hempelmann, B. (2011). Impacts of reputation for quality on perceptions of company responsibility and product-related dangers in times of product-recall and public complains crises: Results from an empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 264–283. doi:10.1057/crr.2010.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L.A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38 (1), 54–69. doi:10.1177/0093650210378229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 1–23.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, S. (2011). Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: The synergistic model of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(2), 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, S. & Haley, E., & Koo, G. (2009). Comparison of the paths from consumer involvement types to ad responses between corporate advertising and product advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, S., & Rader, C. S. (2010). What they can do versus how much they care: Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500 websites. Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, J. & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight our customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 6–18.Google Scholar
  30. Packaged Facts. (2010, July). Prepared foods and ready-to-eat foods at retail: The new competition to foodservice. Retrieved August 24, 2011 from Marketing Research Report database.Google Scholar
  31. Romani S., Grappi S., & Bagozzi R. P. (2012). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z.Google Scholar
  32. Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sung, K. H., & Kim, S. (in press). I want to be friends with you: How effective are organizations’ interpersonal approaches on Facebook? Journal of Public Relations Research. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public RelationsCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations