Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp 99–111 | Cite as

Leadership, Pragmatism and Grace: A Review

Article

Abstract

Leadership takes a central role in the public affairs agenda. This article is a review of published works on leadership focusing on the concept of grace. It discusses the role of compassion and kindness in current leadership theory and practice and whether these attributes have value in sustainable models. Findings indicate that there is conceptual confusion regarding the definition of compassion and its application in leadership practices. Kindness is not discussed within the concept of compassion and kindness itself may be viewed as a weakness in contemporary self-selected leadership characteristics. The conclusions suggest there is disconnect between contemporary models of leadership and calls for sustainable ethical leadership in the spheres of public and business environments. Compassion and kindness remain in the side-lines yet the implications for future trust and commitment are neglected in times where discretionary effort of workers and volunteers is crucial to goal achievement.

Keywords

Leadership Pragmatism Grace Compassion Kindness 

References

  1. Archer, D., & Cameron, A. (2009). Collaborative leadership: How to succeed in an interconnected world. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. (M. Oswald, Trans.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Baloyan, J., & Hope-Hayley, V. (1999). Exploring strategic change. Essex: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bennis, W. (2002). Managing the dream: Reflections on leadership and change. Massachusetts: Perseus Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Boyatzis, R. E., Smith, M. L., & Blaize, N. (2006). Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership on higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke, W. W. (2002). Organization change: Theory and practice. California: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, K. (2011). Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1419–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of followership identities. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 172–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collinson, D., & Collinson, M. (2009). Blended leadership: Employee perspective on effective leadership in the UK further education sector. Leadership, 5(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crane, R. (2009). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dalai Lama. (2001). An Open heart: Practising compassion in everyday life. Vreeland, N. (Ed.). Hodder and Stoughton: London.Google Scholar
  15. Dorfmann, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian Countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunphy, D. (2000). Embracing paradox: Top-down versus participative management of organizational change—a commentary on Conger and Bennis, Chapter 6. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 123–136). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Finnegan, A. P., Finnegan, S. E., Jackson, C., Simpson, R., & Ashford, R. (2010). Pre-disposing factors and associated symptoms of British army personnel requiring a mental health assessment. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 156(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnegan, A., Finnegan, S., McGee, P., Ashcroft, A., & Simpson, R. (2011). Serving within the British Army: Research into mental health benefits. British Journal of Nursing, 20(9), 1256–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fish, D. (2012). Refocusing Postgraduate Medical Education: From the technical to the moral mode of practice. Gloucester: Aneumi Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Fredrick II of Prussia. (1981). The refutation of Machiavelli’s Prince: Or Anti-Machiavelli (P. Sonnino, Trans.). Ohio: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change; the change puzzle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Gill, R. (2006a). Current thinking about leadership: A review and critique, Chapter 2. In Theory and Practice of Leadership (pp. 36–62). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Gill, R. (Ed.). (2006b). Redefining leadership: A new model, Chapter 3. In Theory and Practice of Leadership (pp. 63–96). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Goddard, J. & Vallance, P. (Eds). (2011). The Civic University: Re-uniting the University and the City. In Higher Education in Cities and Regions: For stronger, cleaner and fairer regions. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, pp. 78–90, March/April.Google Scholar
  26. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributive leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansen, D. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Towards a teacher’s creed. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, P. (2010). Machiavelli and the global compass: Ends and means in ethics and leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practices of adaptive leadership—tools and tactics for changing your organisation and the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  30. Holy Bible (2006). Gideon’s International, Leicester.Google Scholar
  31. Kant, I. (1787). Critique of pure reason. (N. Kemp-Smith, 1929, Trans.). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Kant, I. (1790). Critique of Judgement. (J. C. Meredith, 2007, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kohlrieser, G., Goldworthy, S., & Coombe, D. (2012). Care to dare: Unleashing astonishing potential through secure base leadership (JB Warren Bennis Series). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Machievalli, N. (1988). The Prince. (G. Bull, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  35. Marcuse, H. (1987). Eros and civilisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Mintzberg, H. (2006). The Leadership debate with Henry Mintzberg: Community-ship is the answer. The financial times. Retrieved March 2012, from www.ft.com.
  37. Moorman, R. H., & Grover, S. (2009). Why does leader integrity matter to followers? An uncertainty management-based explanation. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 102–114.Google Scholar
  38. Muller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in Interorganisational networks: A literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 428–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NHS Commissioning Board, Chief Nursing Officer & DH Chief Nursing Adviser. (2012). Compassion in practice. Nursing, Midwifery and Care Workers Team. Leeds: Quarry House.Google Scholar
  40. NHS Constitution Team. (2013). Handbook to the NHS constitution. London: NHS.Google Scholar
  41. Palmer, B., Walls, M., Burgess, Z., & Stough, C. (2001). Emotional Intelligence and effective leadership. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 22(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rinpoche, S. (1992). The Tibetan book of living and dying. London: Rider, Random House Ltd.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, J. (1963). Honest to God. London: James Clarke & Co.Google Scholar
  44. Ruddle, K. (2008). In pursuit of agility: Reflections on one practitioner’s journey undertaking, researching, and teaching the leadership of change, Chapter 16. In S. Dobson, M. Earl, & P. Snow (Eds.), Mapping the management journey: Practice, theory and context (pp. 320–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Russell, B. (2000). History of western philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Schiller, J. C. F. (1794). Letters upon the aesthetic education of man. Literary and philosophical essays: French, German and Italian: The Harvard Classics (Vol. 32), Collier. From P. Halsall (1998). New York: Fordham Jesuit University.Google Scholar
  47. Schiller, F. (2004). Letters upon the aesthetic education of man. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  48. Senge, P. (1999). The leadership of profound change. Chapter 1. In P. Senge, A. Kleiner, C. Roberts, R. Ross, G. Roth & B. Smith (1999) (Eds.). The Dance of Change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations (pp. 3–34). London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2006). Presence: Exploring profound change in people, organizations and society. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Shaw, P. (2010). Effective Christian leadership in the workplace. Paternoster: Colorado Springs.Google Scholar
  51. The Koran, (N. J. Dawood, 1956, Trans.). Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, M. (2012). Foreword. In D. Fish (Ed.). Refocusing Postgraduate Medical Education: from the technical to the moral mode of practice. Gloucester: Aneumi Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Upenieks, V. V. (2003). What constitutes effective leadership? Perceptions of magnet and non-magnetic nurse leaders. Journal of Nursing Administration, 33(9), 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. A. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  55. Wheeler, S., McFarland, W., & Kleiner, A. (2007). A blueprint for strategic leadership. Strategy and Business, 49 (Winter).Google Scholar
  56. World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Complex Systems (2013). Perspectives on a hyperconnected world: Insights from the science of complexity. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business, Enterprise and Life-long LearningUniversity of ChesterChesterUK

Personalised recommendations