Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 523–536 | Cite as

Strategic and Moral Dilemmas of Corporate Philanthropy in Developing Countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Katinka C. Van Cranenburgh
  • Daniel Arenas


This case study illustrates the dilemmas facing multinational companies in meeting social challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa (especially health-related ones). It also discusses the purpose, responsibilities and limitations of business involvement in social development. From a business standpoint, social challenges in developing countries differ greatly from those in nations where governments or markets effectively provide for the population’s health needs. The case illustrates what led a multinational to set up a corporate foundation and focuses on three strategic and operational dilemmas it ran up against. The case discussion shows that the ethical issues intertwined with these dilemmas are best understood using a variety of ethical approaches. We also show that Ethics of Care are just as relevant to analysing corporate social responsibility and corporate philanthropy as the Deontological and Utilitarianism theories commonly used in business ethics.


Corporate philanthropy Development Health-care Heineken Ethical theories Ethics of Care Sub-Saharan Africa 


  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Arnove, R. F. (1980). Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad. Boston, MA: G.K. Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Arnove, R. F. (2007). Revisiting the “big three” foundations. Critical Sociology, 33, 389–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poverty and risk: A review of poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: Public Affairs Books.Google Scholar
  5. Barder, O. (2009). Beyond planning: Markets and planning for better aid. Centre for Global Development, Working Paper 185.Google Scholar
  6. Barder, O., & Birdsall, N. (2006). Payments for progress: A hands-off approach to foreign aid. Centre for Global Development, Working Paper 102.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer, P. (1972). Dissent on development. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  9. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2012). Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Bloom, D. E., Bloom, L. R., Steven, D., & Weston, M. (2006). Business & HIV/AIDS: A healthier partnership? A global review of the business response to HIV/AIDS 2005–2006. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved Oct 19, 2011.
  11. Boatright, J. R. (1999). Does business ethics rest on a mistake? Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(4), 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowie, N. E. (1999). A Kantian approach to business ethics. In R. E. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics (pp. 3–16). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burdge, R. J., & Vanclay, F. (1996). Social impact assessment: A contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assessment, 14, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carman, J., & Fredericks, K. (2010). Evaluation capacity and nonprofit organizations: Is the glass half-empty or half-full? American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Renzio, P., & Woods, N. (2008). The trouble with cash on delivery aid: A note on its potential effects on recipient country institutions, Centre for Global Development, Note prepared for the CGD Initiative on ‘Cash on Delivery Aid’.Google Scholar
  18. Dunfee, T. W., & Hess, D. (2000). The legitimacy of direct corporate humanitarian investment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Easterly, W. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2010). The limits of non profit impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper 10-099.Google Scholar
  21. French, W., & Weis, A. (2000). An ethics of care or an ethics of justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frumkin, P. (2006). Strategic giving. The art and science of philanthropy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon, T. P., Knock, C. L., & Neely, D. G. (2009). The role of rating agencies in the market for charitable contributions: An empirical test. Journal of Accountable Public Policy, 28, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1997). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Heineken. (2007). Heineken Health Symposium, speeches, video overview and photo gallery. Retrieved Jan 18, 2012.
  27. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2012). Business–NGO collaboration in a conflict setting: Partnership activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Business & Society, 51, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2002). The effectiveness of self-regulation: Corporate codes of conduct and child labour. European Management Journal, 20(3), 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  31. Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). Theory of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Review, 10(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liedtka, J. M. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethics of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maak, T. (2009). The cosmopolitical corporation. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social impact measurement: Classification of methods, environmental accounting and supply chain measurement. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, 27(3), 171–202.Google Scholar
  38. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  39. Meijs, L. C. P. M. (2010). Reinventing strategic philanthropy: The sustainable organization of voluntary action for impact. Inaugural Address Series, Research in Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam. ISBN 978-90-5892-230-4.Google Scholar
  40. Moyo, D. (2009). Doodlopende hulp: waarom ontwikkelingshulp niet werkt, en wat er wél moet gebeuren, Uitgeverij Contact.Google Scholar
  41. Murray, V. (2005). Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. In R. Herman & Associates (Ed.), The Jossey Bass handbook of nonprofit management, 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–67.Google Scholar
  43. Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2004). The power of information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture. Working paper, IIES, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  44. Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roome, N. (2011). Looking back, thinking forward: Distinguishing between weak and strong sustainability. In T. Bansal & A. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 620–629). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sachs, J. (2005). Who beats corruption. Retrieved March 7, 2013.
  47. Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selsky, J., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singer, P. (2002). One world. The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(May/June):105–116.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, J. D. (2005). Moral markets and managers revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, J., & Dubbink, W. (2011). Understanding the role of moral principles in business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stork, D., & Woodlilla, J. (2007). Nonprofit organizations: An introduction to charity rating sources and cautions in their use. The International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 6(4), 5–28.Google Scholar
  54. Valente, M., & Crane, A. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 12(3), 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Cranenburgh, K. C., Arenas, D., & Albareda, L. (2010). Healthcare provision of a multinational company operating in emerging markets. Ethical motivations, benefits of healthcare investment and the impact on socially responsible investors. In C. Louche, S. O. Idowu, & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the weld: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Van Tulder, R., van Wijk, J., & Kolk, A. (2008). From chain liabililty to chain responsibility: MNE approaches to implement safety and health codes in international supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of “unmentionables”. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
  60. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ESADE Business SchoolRamon Lull UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations