Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 122, Issue 1, pp 145–165 | Cite as

The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy

  • Alice Klettner
  • Thomas Clarke
  • Martijn Boersma
Article

Abstract

This article explores how corporate governance processes and structures are being used in large Australian companies to develop, lead and implement corporate responsibility strategies. It presents an empirical analysis of the governance of sustainability in fifty large listed companies based on each company’s disclosures in annual and sustainability reports. We find that significant progress is being made by large listed Australian companies towards integrating sustainability into core business operations. There is evidence of leadership structures being put in place to ensure that board and senior management are involved in sustainability strategy development and are then incentivised to monitor and ensure implementation of that strategy through financial rewards. There is evidence of a willingness to engage and communicate clearly the results of these strategies to interested stakeholders. Overall, there appears to be a developing acceptance amongst large corporations that efforts towards improved corporate sustainability are not only expected but are of value to the business. We suggest that this is evidence of a managerial shift away from an orthodox shareholder primacy understanding of the corporation towards a more enlightened shareholder value approach, often encompassing a stakeholder-orientated view of business strategy. However, strong underlying tensions remain due to the insistent market emphasis on shareholder value.

Keywords

Corporate governance Corporate sustainability Corporate responsibility Corporate social responsibility implementation Stakeholder theory 

References

  1. Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ACSI (2012). Sustainability reporting practices of S&P/ASX 200 companies http://www.acsi.org.au/images/stories/ACSIDocuments/generalresearchpublic/Sustainability%20Reporting%20Journey%202012.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.
  3. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility : A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, H. & Landau, I. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Australia: A review, corporate law and accountability research group working paper no. 4, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/blt/clarg/working-paper-4.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.
  7. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, O. (2011). An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Government, Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (2006). The social responsibility of corporations.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, M. (2011). Foreword to the second edition of Werther W. B. and Chandler D. strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Banarra Consulting (2011). 2010 Labour practices in sustainability reporting—A review.Google Scholar
  12. Baumann, D. & Scherer, A. G. (2010) MNEs and the UN global compact: An empirical analysis of the organizational implementation of corporate citizenship, institute of organization and administrative science, University of Zurich, IOU working paper no. 114.Google Scholar
  13. Benn, S. (2012). Governance for sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance (pp. 612–627). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  14. Benn, S., & Dunphy, D. (2011). ‘Human and ecological factors: A systematic approach to corporate sustainability’, sustainability and social science. In: Round Table Proceedings, pp. 95–124 http://www.minerals.csiro.au/sd/pubs/Benn_Dunphy_Final.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.
  15. Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44, 1049–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berle, A. A. (1932). For whom corporate managers are trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review, 45, 1365–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009a). The pros and cons of rewarding social responsibility at the top. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009b). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berthelot, S., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1–44.Google Scholar
  20. Blair, M. M. (2004). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., Bamber, D. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). ‘Integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into ISO management. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarke, T. (1993). The political economy of the UK privatisation programme: A blueprint for other countries? In T. Clarke & C. Pitelis (Eds.), The political economy of privatisation (pp. 205–233). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Clarke, T. (2010) Recurring crises in Anglo-American corporate governance, contributions to political economy (pp. 9–32). Oxford University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Clarke, T. (2013). Deconstructing the mythology of shareholder value. Accounting Economics and Law, 3(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  25. Clarke, T., & Monkhouse, E. (1995). Repensando a empresa. Sao Paulo: Pioneira.Google Scholar
  26. Collett, P., & Hrasky, S. (2005). Voluntary disclosure of corporate governance practices by listed Australian companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13. 188–196.Google Scholar
  27. Conn (2005). Connecticut General Statute s33–756, State of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  28. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Bakker, G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44, 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Graaf F. J., & Stoelhorst J. W. (2013). The role of governance in corporate social responsibility lessons from dutch finance. Business Society, 52(2), 282–317.Google Scholar
  31. Deakin, S., & Whittaker, D. H. (2007). Re-embedding the corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
  32. Denzin, N. (1975). The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Dodd, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45, 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (2000). Precis for ties that bind. Business and Society, 105(Winter), 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  36. Doppelt, B. (2003). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Epstein, L. & King, G. (2002). Empirical research and the goals of legal scholarship 69 University of Chicago Law Review 1.Google Scholar
  39. FEE. (2011). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) indicators in annual reports: An introduction to current frameworks. Brussels: Federation of European Accountants.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  41. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gill, A. G. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26, 452–478.Google Scholar
  43. Global Compact/GRI (2007). Making the Connection: The GRI Guidelines and the Global Compact Communication on Progress, Global Reporting Initiative.Google Scholar
  44. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, D. S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.Google Scholar
  47. GRI (2011a). Sustainability reporting guidelines, version 3.1, global reporting initiative.Google Scholar
  48. GRI (2011b). How to use the GRI guidelines in conjunction with ISO 26000, global reporting initiative. Google Scholar
  49. Guillen, M. F. (2004). Corporate governance and globalisation: Is there convergence across countries? In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hansen E. G. & Reichwald, R. (2009). CSR Leadership study: Leading corporate responsibility in multinational corporations: A study in Germany’s biggest firms, report no. 01/2009 of the Institute for information, organization and management, TUM Business School.Google Scholar
  52. Jose, A., & Lee, S.-M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kakabadse, A. P., & Kakabadse, N. K. (2007). CSR in the boardroom: Myth or mindfulness. In A. P. Kakabadse & N. K. Kakabadse (Eds.), CSR in practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davis, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach—A conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Karmel, R.S. (1996). Implications of the stakeholder model, George Washington Law Review, 61, 1156, 1171.Google Scholar
  56. Keay, A. (2007). Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: An analysis of the united kingdom’s ‘enlightened shareholder value approach’. Sydney Law Review, 29, 577–612.Google Scholar
  57. Keay, A. (2010). Moving towards stakeholderism? Consituency statutes, enlightened shareholder value, and all that: Much ado about little? SSRN papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 115451.Google Scholar
  58. Keay, A. (2013). The enlightened shareholder value principle and corporate governance. London: Roultedge.Google Scholar
  59. Kleine, A., & von Hauff, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Klettner, A. (2011). Steering sustainability. Sydney: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  61. Klettner, A. (2012). Corporate governance and the global financial crisis. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of corporate governance. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  62. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  64. KPMG, (2011). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011, KPMG International Cooperative.Google Scholar
  65. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2009). Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 251–256.Google Scholar
  66. Marshall, S. & Ramsay, I., (2009) Stakeholders and Directors’ Duties: Law, Theory and Evidence, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  67. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A., & Campbell, T. (Eds.). (2007). The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.Google Scholar
  70. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  71. Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2013). Leadership for sustainability: An evolution of leadership ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  73. Morgan, G., Ryu, K., & Mirvis, P. (2009). Leading corporate citizenship: Governance, structure, systems. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nitkin, D., & Brooks, L. J. (1998). Sustainability auditing and reporting: The Canadian experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1499–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. OECD (1998). Corporate governance: Improving competitiveness and access to capital in global markets. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  77. OECD. (2009). Annual report on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises 2008. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (2006). Corporate responsibility: Managing risk and creating value.Google Scholar
  80. Philips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  81. Redmond, P. (2012). Directors’ duties and corporate social responsiveness. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 35, 317–340.Google Scholar
  82. Rossouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance: A global survey. Business and Society, 44(1), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Runhaar, H., & Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the contribution of the UN global compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Russel, S., Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2007). Understanding corporate sustainability: Recognizing the impact of different governance systems. In S. Benn & D. Dunphy (Eds.), Corporate governance and sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Russo, M. V., & Harrison, N. S. (2005). Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sachs, S., Maurer, M., Ruhli, E., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from a ‘stakeholder view” perspective: CSR implementation by a Swiss mobile telecommunication provider. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 506–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schembera, S. (2012). Implementing corporate social responsibility: Empirical insights on the impact and accountability of the UN global compact, University of Zurich, business working paper series, working paper no. 316.Google Scholar
  88. Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; cf lynn stout, (2012), new thinking on “Shareholder Primacy”. Accounting Economics and Law,. doi: 10.1515/2152-2820.1037.Google Scholar
  90. Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, Paradigms and Methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. UNEP Finance Initiative (2004). The materiality of social, environmental and governance issues to equity pricing, Geneva: UNEP.Google Scholar
  92. UNEP FI/WBCSD (2010). Translating ESG into sustainable business value, UNEP FI and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  93. Van Velsor, E. (2006). Introduction: Leadership and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Veleva, V. R. (2010). Managing corporate citizenship: A new tool for companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 40–51.Google Scholar
  95. Visser W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business, Wiley, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  96. Weinstein, O. (2012). Firm,Property and governance: From Berle and Means to agency theory, and beyond. Accounting Economics and Law, 2(2), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Whitehouse, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Views from the frontline. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Klettner
    • 1
  • Thomas Clarke
    • 1
  • Martijn Boersma
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Corporate GovernanceUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations