Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 121, Issue 2, pp 297–314 | Cite as

Corporate Legitimacy and Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity

  • Najah Attig
  • Sean W. Cleary
  • Sadok El Ghoul
  • Omrane GuedhamiEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study provides novel evidence of the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on investment sensitivity to cash flows. We posit that CSR affects investment–cash flow sensitivity (ICFS) through information asymmetry and agency costs, commonly viewed as the two channels through which investment responds to the availability of internal cash flows. We find that CSR performance leads to a decrease in ICFS. We further find that ICFS decreases (increases) when CSR strengths (concerns) increase. Finally, we find that the effect of CSR on ICFS is driven by the areas Community, Diversity, and Human Rights. In sum, the findings of this study stress the relevance of CSR—in particular, of CSR activities that extend beyond compliance behavior and reflect what is desired by society—in reducing market frictions and improving firms’ access to financial capital.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Investment–cash flow sensitivity Stakeholder theory 

References

  1. Ağca, S., & Mozumdar, A. (2008). The impact of capital market imperfections on investment–cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allayannis, G., & Mozumdar, A. (2004). The impact of negative cash flow and influential observations on investment-cash flow sensitivity estimates. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 901–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S. J. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attig, N. (2011). Intangible assets, organizational capital and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  5. Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Working paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
  6. Ascioglu, A., Hegde, S. P., & McDermott, J. B. (2008). Information asymmetry and investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1036–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79, 14–31.Google Scholar
  11. Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1990). Financial fragility and economic performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boddewyn, J. J. (2003). Understanding and advancing the concept of “nonmarket”. Business and Society, 42, 297–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 855–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, J. R., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Why has the investment-cash flow sensitivity declined so sharply? Rising R&D and equity market developments. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 971–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B. (1974). Corporate social responsibility: Its managerial impact and implications. Journal of Business Research, 2, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  18. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, Q., Goldstein, I., & Jiang, W. (2007). Price informativeness and investment sensitivity to stock price. Review of Financial Studies, 20, 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  21. Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance, 54, 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cleary, S. (2006). International corporate investment and the relationships between financial constraint measures. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 1559–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cleary, S., Povel, P., & Raith, M. (2007). The U-shaped investment curve: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A. H., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review, 86, 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 141–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. B. (2000). Investment-cash flow sensitivities are useful: A comment on Kaplan and Zingales. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2 The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Figge, F., Han, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard: Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122–126.Google Scholar
  34. Gnanadesikan, R. (1997). Methods for statistical data analysis of multivariate observations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.Google Scholar
  39. Herremans, I. M., & Akathaporn, P. (1993). An investigation of corporate social reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hubbard, R. G. (1998). Capital market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 193–225.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, M. C. (1986). The agency costs of free cash flow: Corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–329.Google Scholar
  44. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy Management Journal, 42, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kadapakkam, P.-R., Kumar, P. C., & Riddick, L. A. (1998). The impact of cash flows and firm size on investment: The international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (2000). Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 707–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Accounting Review, 87, 761–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Legnick-Hall, C. A. (1996). Customer contributions to quality: A different view of the customer-oriented firm. Academy of Management Review, 21, 791–824.Google Scholar
  50. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 117–127.Google Scholar
  53. Menz, K. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miles, R. A. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Myers, S. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39, 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Myers, S., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pawlina, G., & Renneboog, L. (2005). Is investment-cash flow sensitivity caused by agency costs or asymmetric information? Evidence from the UK. European Financial Management, 11, 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shane, P. B., & Spicer, B. H. (1983). Market response to environment information produced outside the firm. Accounting Review, 58, 521–536.Google Scholar
  63. Schreck, P. (2011). Reviewing the business case for corporate social responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. United Nations Global Impact–Accenture. (2010). A new era of sustainability: UN Global Compact–Accenture CEO Study 2010, last accessed January 26, 2012, at: http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture_A_New_Era_of_Sustainability_CEO_Study.pdf.
  67. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wei, K. C. J., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Ownership structure, cash flow, and capital investment: Evidence from East Asian economies before the financial crisis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whitehouse, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Views from the frontline. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Najah Attig
    • 1
  • Sean W. Cleary
    • 2
  • Sadok El Ghoul
    • 3
  • Omrane Guedhami
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Saint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  4. 4.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations