Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 113, Issue 4, pp 597–609 | Cite as

Kant on Virtue

  • Claus Dierksmeier
Article

Abstract

In business ethics journals, Kant’s ethics is often portrayed as overly formalistic, devoid of substantial content, and without regard for the consequences of actions or questions of character. Hence, virtue ethicists ride happily to the rescue, offering to replace or complement Kant’s theory with their own. Before such efforts are undertaken, however, one should recognize that Kant himself wrote a “virtue theory” (Tugendlehre), wherein he discussed the questions of character as well as the teleological nature of human action. Numerous Kant scholars argue that Kant already erected precisely the kind of integrative moral architecture that some of his modern interpreters (while aiming to supersede him) wish to construct. For business ethics, this divergence of scholarly opinion is of crucial importance. It shows first that the standard portrayals of Kant’s ethics in business ethics textbooks—as rigidly deontological, narrowly individualistic, and hence unsuitable for the specific demands of corporate agency—might have to be revised. Second, discussions in the business ethics literature on stakeholder-engagement and managerial decision-making likewise stand to gain from a more nuanced picture of Kant’s moral philosophy. Third, a reassessment of Kant’s ethics with regard to questions of personal character and moral sentiments might also lead to a more favorable view of the relevance of his ethics for managerial practice. Last, but not least, the many current attempts to reconcile Kant’s freedom-oriented philosophy with virtue theories stand to benefit considerably from a better understanding of how Kant himself conceived of one such synthesis between the formal and substantial aspects of morality. This, ultimately, could lead to an important overlapping consensus in the academic literature as to the role and relevance of virtuous conduct in business.

Keywords

Virtue ethics Teleology Deontology Kant Kantian Formalism 

References

  1. Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and social justice: The political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, M. C. (2007). The decomposition of the corporate body: What Kant cannot contribute to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alzola, M. (2008). Character and environment: The status of virtues in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ameriks, K. (2000). Kant and the fate of autonomy: Problems in the appropriation of the critical philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arendt, H., & Beiner, R. (1982). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  6. Arjoon, S. (2008). Reconciling situational social psychology with virtue ethics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audi, R. (2001). A Kantian intuitionism. Mind, 110(439), 601–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, M. (1987). Kantian ethics and supererogation. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(5), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartuschat, W. (1972). Zum systematischen Ort von Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar
  11. Bastons, M. (2008). The role of virtues in the framing of decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baxley, A. M. (2003). Does Kantian virtue amount to more than continence? The Review of Metaphysics, 56(3), 559–586.Google Scholar
  13. Beckley, H. (2002). Capability as opportunity: How Amartya Sen revises equal opportunity. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 30(1), 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bertland, A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, Issue Title: Supplement 1: 13th Annual Vincentian international conference promoting business ethics, Springer, 25–32.Google Scholar
  15. Blesenkemper, K. (1987). “Publice age,” Studien zum Öffentlichkeitsbegriff bei Kant. Frankfurt/Main: Haag + Herchen.Google Scholar
  16. Blum, L. A. (1980). Friendship, altruism, and morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowie, N. E., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). Confronting morality in markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4), 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bowie, N. E., & Werhane, P. H. (2005). Management ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Bright, D. S., Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2006). The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brugger, W. (1964). Kant und das höchste Gut. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 18(1), 50–61.Google Scholar
  22. Caza, A., Barker, B. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2004). Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chun, R. (2005). Ethical character and virtue of organizations: An empirical assessment and strategic implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Colle, S. d., & Werhane, P. H. (2008). Moral motivation across ethical theories: What can we learn for designing corporate ethics programs? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crockett, C. (2005). The cultural paradigm of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cummiskey, D. (1990). Kantian consequentialism. Ethics, 100(3), 586–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dawson, D., & Bartholomew, C. (2003). Virtues, managers and business people: Finding a place for MacIntyre in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De George, R. T. (2010). Business ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Denis, L. (2010). Kant’s metaphysics of morals: A critical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dierksmeier, C. (1998). Das Noumenon Religion: eine Untersuchung zur Stellung der Religion im System der praktischen Philosophie Kants. Berlin [u.a.]: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Dierksmeier, C. (2011). Kant’s humanist ethics. In Humanistic ethics in the age of globality (pp. 79–93). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Dierksmeier, C., & Celano, A. (2012). Justice as the global virtue of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dierksmeier, C., & Pirson, M. (2009). Oikonomia versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dierksmeier, C., & Pirson, M. (2010). The modern corporation and the idea of freedom. Philosophy in Management, 9(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
  35. Donaldson, T., Werhane, P. H., & Van Zandt, J. D. (2008). Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Drake, M. J., & Schlachter, J. T. (2008). A virtue-ethics analysis of supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dubbink, W., & Liedekerke, L. v. (2009). A Neo-Kantian foundation of corporate social responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(2), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Düsing, K. (1968). Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Bonn: H. Bouvier und Co.Google Scholar
  39. Düsing, K. (1971). Das Problem des höchsten Guts in Kants praktischer Philosophie. Kant-Studien, 62, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eisenberg, P. D. (1966). From the forbidden to the supererogatory: The basic ethical categories in Kant’s “Tugendlehre”. American Philosophical Quarterly, 3(4), 255–269.Google Scholar
  41. Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  42. Esquith, S. L., & Gifford, F. (2010). Capabilities, power, and institutions: Toward a more critical development ethics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Etzioni, A. (2004). The common good. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  44. Everett, J., Neu, D., & Rahaman, A. S. (2006). The global fight against corruption: A Foucaultian, virtues-ethics framing. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228–241.Google Scholar
  48. Freeman, R. E., Werhane, P. H., & Society for Business Ethics. (2004). Business, science, and ethics. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  49. Freier, F. V. (1992). Kritik der Hegelschen Formalismusthese. Kant-Studien: Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft, 83(2), 304–323.Google Scholar
  50. French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.Google Scholar
  51. Gauthier, J. A. (1997). Schiller’s critique of Kant’s moral psychology: Reconciling practical reason and an ethics of virtue. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 513–543.Google Scholar
  52. Gehrke, P. J. (2002). Turning Kant against the priority of autonomy: Communication ethics and the duty to community. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 35(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Giovanola, B. (2009). Re-thinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2008). Philosophical foundations of workplace spirituality: A critical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Guevara, D. (1999). The impossibility of supererogation in Kant’s moral theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59(3), 593–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Guyer, P. (2000). Kant on freedom, law, and happiness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hackenberg, H., & Empter, S. (2011). Social entrepreneurship und social business: Phänomen, Potentiale, Prototypen – Ein Überblick. In H. Hackenberg & S. Empter (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship—Social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen (pp. 11–26). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Harter, L. M., Dutta, M. J., & Cole, C. (2009). Communicating for social impact: Engaging communication theory, research, and pedagogy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  60. Haugh, H. (2007). New strategies for a sustainable society: The growing contribution of social entrepreneurship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hegel, G. W. F., Moldenhauer, E., & Michel, K. M. (1969). Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  62. Heinrich, D., Kant, I., Gentz, F. v., & Rehberg, A. W. (1967). Uber Theorie und Praxis. Théorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  63. Henrich, D., & Velkley, R. L. (1994). The unity of reason: Essays on Kant’s philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Höffe, O. (1983). Immanuel Kant. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  65. Höffe, O. F. M. (Trans.). (1994). Immanuel Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  66. Jost, L. J., & Wuerth, J. (2011). Perfecting virtue: New essays on Kantian ethics and virtue ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kaptein, M., & Van Tulder, R. (2003). Toward effective stakeholder dialogue. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kaulbach, F. (1996). Immanuel Kants “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”: Interpretation und Kommentar. Werkinterpretationen: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  69. Kersting, W. (2004). Kant über Recht. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  70. Kimakowitz, E. v. (2011). Humanistic management in practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the kingdom of ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Korsgaard, C. M., & O’Neill, O. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Laidlaw, J. (2002). For an anthropology of ethics and freedom. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(2), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Langthaler, R. (1991). Kants Ethik als “System der Zwecke”: Perspektiven einer modifizierten Idee der “moralischen Teleologieund Ethikotheologie. Berlin: New York.Google Scholar
  75. Lo, P.-c. (1981). A critical reevaluation of the alleged “empty formalism” of Kantian ethics. Ethics, 91(2), 181–201.Google Scholar
  76. Louden, R. B. (1984). On some vices of virtue ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(3), 227–236.Google Scholar
  77. Louden, R. B. (1986). Kant’s virtue ethics. Philosophy, 61(238), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. MacDonald, J. E., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (1994). Are deontology and teleology mutually exclusive? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. MacIntyre, A. C. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  80. May, S. (2013). Case studies in organizational communication: Ethical perspectives and practices. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. McCarty, R. (1989). The limits of Kantian duty, and beyond. American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(1), 43–52.Google Scholar
  82. McCracken, J., & Shaw, B. (1995). Virtue ethics and contractarianism: Towards a reconciliation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Micewski, E. R., & Troy, C. (2007). Business ethics: Deontologically revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moberg, D. J. (1999). The big five and organizational virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Moberg, D. J., & Meyer, M. J. (1990). A deontological analysis of peer relations in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(11), 863–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nelson, W. (2008). Kant’s formula of humanity. Mind, 117(465), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nicholls, A. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Virtue ethics: A misleading category? The Journal of Ethics, 3(3), 163–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. O’Neill, O. (1989). Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant’s practical philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Oakley, J. (1990). A critique of Kantian arguments against emotions as moral motives. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 7(4), 441–459.Google Scholar
  93. Oosterhout, J. v., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Kaptein, M. (2006). The internal morality of contracting: Advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Packer, M. (1989). Kant on desire and moral pleasure. Journal of the History of Ideas, 50(3), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Parkan, B. (2008). Professionalism: A virtue or estrangement from self-activity? Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1/2), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Powell, B. K. (2006). Kant and Kantians on “the normative question”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9(5), 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Prauss, G.c. (1973). Kant: zur Deutung seiner Theorie von erkennen u. Handeln. Köln: Kiepenheuer und Witsch.Google Scholar
  98. Provis, C. (2010). The ethics of impression management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(2), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Reynolds, S. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). A Kantian perspective on the characteristics of ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Roca, E. (2008). Introducing practical wisdom in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Scheler, M. F. (1921). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  102. Schönecker, D., Buchenau, S., & Hogan, D. (2005). Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit: eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schroeder, H. H. (1940). Some common misinterpretations of the Kantian ethics. The Philosophical Review, 49(4), 424–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  105. Shanahan, K. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2003). The development of a virtue ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shaw, W. H. (2002). Business ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  107. Silber, J. R. (1974). Procedural formalism in Kant’s ethics. The Review of Metaphysics, 28(2), 197–236.Google Scholar
  108. Simmons, L. (1993). Kant’s highest good: Albatross, keystone, achilles heel. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 10(4), 355–368.Google Scholar
  109. Sison, A. G. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  110. Solomon, R. C. (1999). A better way to think about business: How personal integrity leads to corporate success. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Solomon, R. C. (2000). Business with virtue: Maybe next year? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 339–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Speight, C. A. (1997). The “metaphysics” of morals and Hegel’s critique of Kantian ethics. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 14(4), 379–402.Google Scholar
  113. Stohr, K., & Wellman, C. H. (2002). Recent work on virtue ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39(1), 49–72.Google Scholar
  114. Sullivan, R. J. (1974). The Kantian critique of Aristotle’s moral philosophy: An appraisal. The Review of Metaphysics, 28(1), 24–53.Google Scholar
  115. Sundman, P. (2000). The good manager: A moral manager? Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Swanton, C. (2010). Heideggerian environmental virtue ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Thielemann, U. (2005). Compliance und Integrity – Zwei Seiten ethisch integrierter Unternehmenssteuerung. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 6(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
  119. Thielemann, U., & Wettstein, F. (2008). The case against the business case and the idea of “earned reputation”. St. Gallen: Institute for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  120. Timmons, M. (2002). Kant’s metaphysics of morals: Interpretative essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2010). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  122. Velkley, R. L. (1989). Freedom and the end of reason: On the moral foundation of Kant’s critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  123. Ward, K. (1971). Kant’s teleological ethics. The Philosophical Quarterly, 21(85), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Weaver, G. R. (2006). Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organization Studies, 27(3), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Werhane, P. H. (1994). Justice, impartiality, and reciprocity: A response to Edwin Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(3), 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Whetstone, J. T. (2003). The language of managerial excellence: Virtues as understood and applied. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Williams, B. A. O. (1981). Moral luck: Philosophical papers, 19731980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  129. Wood, A. W. (1999). Kant’s ethical thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zakhem, A. J., Palmer, D. E., & Stoll, M. L. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Essential readings in ethical leadership and management. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Ethic InstituteUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations