Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 113, Issue 4, pp 649–661 | Cite as

Virtue and Vice Attributions in the Business Context: An Experimental Investigation

Article

Abstract

Recent findings in experimental philosophy have revealed that people attribute intentionality, belief, desire, knowledge, and blame asymmetrically to side-effects depending on whether the agent who produces the side-effect violates or adheres to a norm. Although the original (and still common) test for this effect involved a chairman helping or harming the environment, hardly any of these findings have been applied to business ethics. We review what little exploration of the implications for business ethics has been done. Then, we present new experimental results that expand the attribution asymmetry to virtue and vice. We also examine whether it matters to people that an effect was produced as a primary or side-effect, as well as how consumer habits might be affected by this phenomenon. These results lead to the conclusion that it appears to be in a businessperson’s self-interest to be virtuous.

Keywords

Attributions Knobe effect Side-effect Side-effect effect Vice Virtue 

References

  1. Alfano, M. (2013). Character as moral fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfano, M., Beebe, J., & Robinson, B. (2012). The centrality of belief and reflection in Knobe effect cases: A unified account of the data. The Monist, 95(2), 246–289.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe, J. R., & Buckwalter, W. (2010). The epistemic side-effect effect. Mind & Language, 25(4), 474–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beebe, J. R., & Jensen, M. (2012). Surprising connections between knowledge and action: The robustness of the epistemic side-effect effect. Philosophical Psychology, 25(5), 689–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cova, F., & Naar, H. (2012). Side-effect effect without side-effects: The pervasive impact of moral considerations on judgments of intentionality. Philosophical Psychology, 25(6), 837–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side-effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63(3), 190–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knobe, J. (2004). Folk psychology and folk morality: Response to critics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knobe, J. (2007). Reason explanation in folk psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31(1), 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knobe, J., & Mendlow, G. (2004). The good, the bad and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadelhoffer, T. (2004). On praise, side-effects, and folk ascriptions of intentionality. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pettit, D., & Knobe, J. (2009). The pervasive impact of moral judgment. Mind & Language, 24(5), 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sripada, C. S. (2011). What makes a manipulated agent unfree? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00527.x.
  15. Swint, B. (2010, November 2). BP profit drops after taking further charge on gulf spill. Bloomberg. Retreived from http://www.bloomberg.com/.
  16. Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47–66.Google Scholar
  17. Wible, A. (2009). Knobe, side-effects, and the morally good business. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Supplement 1), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Williams, B. (2010). Nightly news with Brian Williams. Retried from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#39858528.
  19. Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zhang, Z., & Wang, L. (2009). BMEM: bootstrap mediation analysis using EM algorithm, Version 4.0. Retried from http://bmem.psychstat.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grand Valley State UniversityAllendaleUSA
  2. 2.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  3. 3.Princeton University Center for Human ValuesPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations