Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 291–311 | Cite as

Culture Corrupts! A Qualitative Study of Organizational Culture in Corrupt Organizations

Article

Abstract

Although theory refers to organizational culture as an important variable in corrupt organizations, only little empirical research has addressed the characteristics of a corrupt organizational culture. Besides some characteristics that go hand in hand with unethical behavior and other features of corrupt organizations, we are still not able to describe a corrupt organizational culture in terms of its underlying assumptions, values, and norms. With a qualitative approach, we studied similarities of organizational culture across different corrupt organizations. In this study, we performed content analysis on interviews of 14 independent experts about their experience with corrupt organizations. With this approach, we gained insights about different corrupt organizations spanning different branches (e.g., government, foreign trade, pharmacy, sports, building industry). We found that corrupt organizations perceive themselves to fight in a war, which leads to their taken-for-granted assumption that “the end justifies the means”. This assumption inspires many values and norms of the organizational culture. An important value in a corrupt organization is “security”, and an important norm is punishment of deviant (i.e., non-corrupt) behavior. Furthermore, managers and employees differ in their perception of organizational culture. While the management endorses values, such as success, results, and performance, and implements these values in their norms of goal setting, employees make use of rationalization strategies and endorse values of security and team spirit.

Keywords

Corruption Corrupt organization Employee and manager values, norms, underlying assumptions Organizational culture 

References

  1. Alvesson, M. (2011). Organizational culture: Meaning, discourse, and identity. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Organizational culture and climate (pp. 11–28). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2005). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. André, R. (2008). Organizational behavior. An introduction to your life in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). Introduction to special topic forum: Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  7. Avakian, S., & Roberts, J. (2012). Whistleblowers in organisations: Prophets at work? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beenen, G., & Pinto, J. (2009). Resisting organizational-level corruption: An interview with Enron Whistle-Blower Sherron Watkins. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, B. (2004). Organizational culture: A framework and strategies for facilitating employee whistleblowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 471–499). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Brucke, R., Tomlinson, E., & Cooper, C. (2010). Crime and corruption in organizations. Why it occurs and what to do about it. Surrey: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, J-j, & Lai, C-c. (2002). Is the efficiency wage efficient? The social norm and organizational corruption. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, D. V. (1995). Ethics and crime in business firms: Organizational culture and the impact of anomie. In F. Adler & W. Laufer (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 6, pp. 183–206). The Legacy of Anomie Theory New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, J. D., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Craft, J. L. (2012). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9 or http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9/fulltext.html
  17. Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., Mayer, D. M., & Gregory, J. B. (2012). Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeCelles, K. A., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2004). Heroes or Villains? Corruption and the charismatic leader. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberger, D. B., Miceli, M. P., & Cohen, D. J. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and colleagues. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(7), 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, J. L., Martin, K. D., & Saini, A. (2011). Strategic culture and environmental dimensions as determinants of anomie in publicly-traded and privately-held firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joshi, M., Anand, V., & Henderson, K. (2007). The role of organizational practices and routines in facilitating normalized corruption. In J. Langan-Fox, C. L. Cooper, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 235–251). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Kaptein, M. (2011a). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaptein, M. (2011b). Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64(6), 843–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kluckhohn, F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variation in value orientation. New York: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
  28. Levine, D. P. (2005). The corrupt organization. Human Relations, 58(6), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (1999). The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development. Leadership and Organization, 20(7), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLean, T. L. (2008). Framing and organizational misconduct: A symbolic interactionist study. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, K. D., Johnson, J. L., & Cullen, J. B. (2009). Organizational change, normative control deinstitutionalization, and corruption. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2004). Excuses, excuses: What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2009). A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miles, M. B., & Hubermann, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook. Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Socialization in organizations and work group. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 69–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In G. Guest & K. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–161). Lahnham, MD: Altamira.Google Scholar
  41. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Palmer, D., & Maher, M. W. (2006). Developing the process model of collective corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(4), 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park, C., & Keil, M. (2009). Organizational silence and whistle-blowing on IT projects: An integrated model. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 901–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Payne, R. L. (2000). Climate and culture: How close can they get? In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. P. M. Wilderom (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 163–176). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 730–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinto, J., Leana, C., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations—Development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rehg, M. T., Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & van Scotter, J. R. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and power relationships. Organizational Science, 19(2), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scales study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organization corruption. Work and Occupations, 26(1), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russel, B. H. (2000). Social research methods. qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shover, N., & Hochstetler, A. (2002). Cultural explanation and organizational crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spicer, A. (2009). The normalization of corrupt business practices: Implications for Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT). Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 833–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stackman, R. W., Pinder, C. C., & Connor, P. E. (2000). Values lost: Redirecting research on values in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. P. M. Wilderom (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 37–45). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Transparency International. (2011). Bribes Payer Index 2011. Germany: Berlin.Google Scholar
  62. Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (2001). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 301–337.Google Scholar
  63. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. (1990). Bad appels in bad barrels. A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The culture of work organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  66. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vadera, A. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Caza, B. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4), 553–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolfe Morrison, E., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.Google Scholar
  70. Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in china: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zyglidopoulos, S. C., & Fleming, P. J. (2008). Ethical distance in corrupt firms: How do innocent bystanders become guilty perpetrators. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung WirtschaftspsychologieFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Psychologisches Institut Arbeits-, Betriebs- und OrganisationspsychologieWuerzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations