Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 119, Issue 3, pp 423–434 | Cite as

Taking Terrain Literally: Grounding Local Adaptation to Corporate Social Responsibility in the Extractive Industries

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, the extractive industries have increasingly valued corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the communities where they operate. More recently, these industries have begun to recognize the importance of adapting CSR efforts to unique local contexts rather than applying a one-size-fits-all model. However, firms understand local context to mean culture and treat the physical properties of the host region—topography, geology, hydrology, and climate—as the exclusive purview of mineral geologists and engineers. In this article, we examine the organization of CSR at two industrial-scale gold mines in Guatemala, owned by the same firm, which yielded starkly distinct levels of support among host community residents. We develop the idea of social terrain to convey the way in which the biophysical environment informs local social relations and imbues phenomena with particular social meanings. We argue that firms must account for social terrain in organizing for CSR. The literature struggles to provide guidelines for identifying and understanding stakeholders. Social terrain, we argue, can begin to bridge this gap between theory and practice.

Keywords

Business and society Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Extractive industries Gold mining Guatemala Materiality Political CSR Social terrain 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrams, F. (1951). Management’s responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29, 29–34.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, K. (2002). From state to market? Water mercantilizatión in Spain. Environment and Planning A, 34, 767–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barelli, M. (2010). The interplay between global and regional human rights systems in the construction of the indigenous rights regime. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), 951–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barham, B., Bunker, S. G., & O’Hearn, D. (1994). Raw materials industries in resource rich regions. In B. Barham, S. G. Bunker, & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), States, firms and raw materials: The world economy and the ecology of aluminium (pp. 3–39). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, W., Prudham, W. S., & Schurman, R. A. (2001). Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society & Natural Resources, 14(7), 555–570.Google Scholar
  7. Bridge, G. (2004). Mapping the bonanza: Geographies of mining investment in an era of neoliberal reform. The Professional Geographer, 56, 406–421.Google Scholar
  8. Buchholz, R. A. (1998). Principles of environmental management: The greening of business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Bunker, S. G., & Ciccantell, P. S. (2005). Globalization and the race for resources. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buttel, F. H. (2005). Environmental sociology’s theoretical and empirical paradoxes. In P. S. Ciccantell, D. A. Smith, & G. Seidman (Eds.), Nature, raw materials and political economy (pp. 45–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. (1981). Business and society: Managing corporate social performance. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, D. (2009). The failure of a socially responsive gold mining MNC in El Salvador: Ramifications of NGO mistrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Bakker, F. G. A., & den Hond, F. (2008). Introducing the politics of stakeholder influence: A review essay. Business & Society, 47(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donnelly, R., & Ford, B. (2008). Into Africa: How the resource boom is making Sub-Saharan Africa more important to Australia. Lowy Institute Paper 24. Double Bay, NSW: Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
  15. Dougherty, M. L. (2011a). Peasants, Firms, and activists in the struggle over gold mining in Guatemala: Shifting landscapes of extraction and resistance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  16. Dougherty, M. L. (2011b) The global gold mining industry, junior firms, and civil society resistance in Guatemala. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 30(4), 403–418.Google Scholar
  17. DuPuis, E. M. (2002). Nature’s perfect food: How milk became America’s drink. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, T. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and development: In quest of an agenda. Development, 47(3), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman Press.Google Scholar
  20. Friedland, W. (1994). The global fresh fruit and vegetable system: An industrial organization analysis. In P. McMichael (Ed.), The global restructuring of agro-food systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  22. Gellert, P. (2005). For a sociology of ‘socionature’: Ontology and the commodity-based approach. In P. S. Ciccantell, D. A. Smith, & G. Seidman (Eds.), Nature, raw materials and political economy (pp. 65–92). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? APSR, 98(2), 341–354.Google Scholar
  24. Gifford, B., Kestler, A., & Anand, S. (2010). Building local legitimacy into corporate social responsibility: Gold mining firms in developing nations. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas, J. (1998). Three normative models of democracy. In J. Habermas (Ed.), The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory (pp. 239–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hanmann, R. (2003). Mining companies’ role in sustainable development: The ‘why’ and ‘how’ of corporate social responsibility from a business perspective. Development Southern Africa, 20(2), 237–254.Google Scholar
  27. Holden, W. N., & Jacobsen, R. D. (2009). Ecclesial opposition to nonferrous mining in Guatemala: Neoliberalism meets the church of the poor in a shattered society. The Canadian Geographer, 522, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2007). Encuesta nacional agropecuaria. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Guatemala City, Guatemala.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: Conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapelus, P. (2002). Mining, corporate social responsibility and the ‘community’: The case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaup, B. Z. (2008). Negotiating through nature: The resistant materiality and materiality of resistance in Bolivia’s natural gas sector. Geoforum, 39, 1734–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kemp, D., Owen, J. R., Gotzmann, N., & Bond, C. J. (2010). Just relations and company–community conflict in mining. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 41–50.Google Scholar
  34. Loarca, C. (2008). Mecanismos de impunidad ambiental para la hidroeléctrica Xalalá contra la consulta comunitaria de buena fe del Ixcán. Accessed on January 18, 2010, from http://www.albedrio.org/htm/documentos/cloarca-002.pdf.
  35. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.Google Scholar
  37. McMahon, G., & Remy, F. (2001). Large mines and the community: Socioeconomic and environmental effects in Latin America, Canada, and Spain. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  39. Newell, P. (2005). Citizenship, accountability and community: The limits of the CSR agenda. International Affairs, 81(3), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oficina Municipal de Planificación de Asunción Mita, Jutiapa. (2002). Caracterización final de Asunción Mita. Unpublished document retrieved from the Municipal Planning Office of the Town Hall of Asunción Mita.Google Scholar
  41. Oficina Municipal de Planificación de Tectitán. (2008). Información general de Tectitán. Unpublished document retrieved from the Municipal Planning Office of the Town Hall of Tectitán, Huehuetenango, Guatemala.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  44. Prieto-Carrón, M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., Muro, A., & Bhushan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. International Affairs, 82(5), 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sagebien, J., & Lindsay, N. M. (2011). Governance ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American mining sector. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scherer, A. G., & Pallazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.Google Scholar
  47. Scherer, A. G., & Pallazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.Google Scholar
  48. SEGEPLAN (2005) Mapas de pobreza en Guatemala al 2002. http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/povmap/methods/Mapas_de_la_Pobreza_2002.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2011.
  49. SEGEPLAN (2010) Planes de desarrollo estratégico. www.segeplan.gob.gt. Accessed 29 Nov 2011.
  50. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.Google Scholar
  51. Sluyter, A. (2003). Neo-environmental determinism, intellectual damage control, and nature/society science. Antipode, 35(4), 813–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Szablowski, D. (2002). Mining, displacement and the World Bank: A case analysis of Compania Minera Antamina’s operations in Peru. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Talbot, J. (2004). Grounds for agreement: The political economy of the coffee commodity chain. Lantham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, R. (1985). Citizenship, gender and work: Social organization of industrial agriculture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Van de Sandt, J. (2009). Mining conflicts and indigenous peoples in Guatemala. The Hague: Cordaid.Google Scholar
  56. Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment (pp. 57–73). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyIllinois State University CampusNormalUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business Ethics & Legal Studies, Daniels College of BusinessUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations