Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach

Abstract

Current research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) illustrates the growing sense of discord surrounding the ‘business of doing good’ (Dobers and Springett, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 17(2):63–69, 2010). Central to these concerns is that CSR risks becoming an over-simplified and peripheral part of corporate strategy. Rather than transforming the dominant corporate discourse, it is argued that CSR and related concepts are limited to “emancipatory rhetoric…defined by narrow business interests and serve to curtail interests of external stakeholders.” (Banerjee, Crit Sociol 34(1):52, 2008). The paper addresses gaps in the literature and challenges current thinking on corporate governance and CSR by offering a new conceptual framework that responds to the concerns of researchers and practitioners. The limited focus of existing analyses is extended by a holistic approach to corporate governance and social responsibility that integrates company, shareholder and wider stakeholder concerns. A defensive stance is avoided by delineating key stages of the governance process and aligning profit centred and social responsibility concerns to produce a business-based rationale for minimising risk and mainstreaming CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ahmed, P. K., & Machold, S. (2004). The quality and ethics connection: Towards virtuous organisations. Total Quality Management, 15(4), 527–545.

  2. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Rahman, S. S., & Husted, B. (2002). Introduction: Stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6(Summer), 16–18.

  3. Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(6), 327–343.

  4. Ballinger, C. (2011). HR’s role in embedding a responsible approach to business. Impact, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 37, 10–11.

  5. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.

  6. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on customer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.

  7. Beverungen, A., & Case, P. (2011). Editorial introduction: Where is business ethics? Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 229–232.

  8. Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Martinez-Martinez, A. (2009). Linking corporate social responsibility with admiration through organisational outcomes. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(4), 499–511.

  9. Cheng, W. L., & Ahmad, J. (2010). Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility: A case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 593–610.

  10. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.

  11. Cuganesan, S. (2006). Reporting organisational performance in managing human resources: Intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(3), 164–188.

  12. Davies, G., & Chun, R. (2002). Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 144–158.

  13. de Wit, M., Wade, M., & Schoutan, E. (2006). Hardwiring and softwiring CSR: A vital combination. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 491–505.

  14. Dobers, P., & Springett, D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Discourse, narratives and communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 63–69.

  15. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

  16. Drews, M. (2010). Measuring the business and societal benefits of corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance, 10, 421–431.

  17. Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.

  18. Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct an examination in the performance appraisal context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 205–222.

  19. Fassin, Y. (2010). A dynamic perspective on Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.

  20. Fassin, Y., & Buelens, M. (2011). The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum of corporate communication and decision making: A model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices. Management Decision, 49(4), 586–600.

  21. Ferreira, D. A., Avila, M. G., & de Faria, M. D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and customers’ perception of price. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 206–221.

  22. Flint, D. H. (1999). The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: Theory-based applications and directions for research. Human Resource Management Review, 9(1), 1–20.

  23. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Tradeoffs and value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.

  24. Greenwood, M. R. (2001). Community as stakeholder: Focusing on corporate social and environmental reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 4(Winter), 31–45.

  25. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.

  26. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56.

  27. Hess, D., & Warren, D. E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113, 163–197.

  28. Jones, D. (2012). Who cares wins: Why good business is better business. Financial Times Series. London: Financial Times.

  29. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D, P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1),71–79.

  30. Katsoulakos, T., & Katsoulakos, Y. (2007). Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: A stakeholder orientated and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 355–369.

  31. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory. Chicago: Rand McNally.

  32. Koslowski, P. (2000). The limits of shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 137–148.

  33. Laudal, T. (2011). Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 234–256.

  34. Law, P. (2011). Audit regulatory reform with a refined stakeholder model to enhance corporate governance: Hong Kong evidence. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 123–135.

  35. Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: From managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance, 5(2), 60–77.

  36. Lozano, J. M. (2008). CSR or RSC? (Beyond the humpty dumpty syndrome). Society and Business Review, 3(3), 191–206.

  37. Maclagan, P. (2007). Hierarchical control or individual’s moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 48–69.

  38. Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Do stakeholder management strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies? Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 306–327.

  39. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

  40. Mont, O., & Leire, C. (2009). Socially responsible purchasing in supply chains: Drivers and barriers in Sweden. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 389–407.

  41. Niebuhr, H. R., & Gustafson, J. M. (1963). The responsible self. An essay in Christian moral philosophy. New York: Harper.

  42. Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sense making perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.

  43. Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.

  44. Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011). Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 825–840.

  45. Papasolomou, I., Papasolomou-Doukakis, M., Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Katsioloudes, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: The way forward? Maybe not!: A preliminary study in Cyprus. European Business Review, 17(3), 263–279.

  46. Paulet, E. (2011). Banking ethics. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 293–300.

  47. Pava, M. T. (2011). Corporate accountability. SAGE Brief Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Sage.

  48. Petersen, H. L., & Vredenburg, H. (2009). Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 90(1), 1–14.

  49. Rake, M., & Grayson, D. (2009). Embedding corporate responsibility and sustainability—Everybody’s business. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 395–399.

  50. Rasche, A. (2010). Collaborative governance 2.0. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 500–511.

  51. Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 595–612.

  52. Roberts, J. (2001). Trust and control in Anglo–American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability. Human Relations, 54, 1547–1572.

  53. Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265–283.

  54. Rouse, P., & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791–805.

  55. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4), 511–541.

  56. Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.

  57. Sachs, S., Maurer, M., Ruhli, E., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from a “stakeholder view” perspective: CSR implementation by a Swiss mobile telecommunication provider. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 506–515.

  58. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

  59. Sherwin, D. (1983). The ethical roots of the business system. Harvard Business Review, 61(6), 183–192.

  60. Simmons, J. A. (2008). Ethics and morality in human resource management. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 8–23.

  61. Simmons, J. A. (2009). Both sides now: Aligning external and internal branding for a socially responsible era. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 27(5), 681–697.

  62. Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. G. (2010). Stakeholder governance: How stakeholders influence corporate decision making. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 378–391.

  63. Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2011). A conceptual framework of corporate and business ethics across organisations, structures and processes. The Learning Organisation, 18(1), 21–35.

  64. Tudgay, R., & Pascal, A.-M. (2006). Corporate governance, shareholder value and societal expectations. Corporate Governance, 6(3), 305–316.

  65. Waring, P. (2008). Rethinking directors’ duties in changing global markets. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 153–164.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Chris Mason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, C., Simmons, J. Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach. J Bus Ethics 119, 77–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Corporate governance
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Stakeholder systems