Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 3, pp 497–513 | Cite as

Management Responses to Social Activism in an Era of Corporate Responsibility: A Case Study

  • Katinka C. Van Cranenburgh
  • Kellie Liket
  • Nigel Roome
Article

Abstract

Social activism against companies has evolved in the 50 years since Rachel Carson first put the US chemical industry under pressure to halt the indiscriminate use of the chemical DDT. Many more companies have come under the spotlight of activist attention as the agenda social activists address has expanded, provoked in part by the internationalization of business. During the past fifteen years, companies have begun to formulate corporate responsibility (CR) policies and appointed management teams dedicated to CR, resulting in a change in the way companies interact with social activists. This paper presents findings from a longitudinal case study of managerial responses to social activism targeted at a company with relatively well-advanced CR practices and reputation. The case describes the unfolding of the internal processes over an 8-year period, including the role played by different managers and the tensions in the decision-making processes. The findings emphasize how values and beliefs in the company interact with economic arguments and how those are mediated through functions and relationships in the company and beyond. The paper shows how critical managers’ understanding of the motivations of activists behind the campaign is in shaping their actions. It reveals the paradoxical outcomes that can result from social activism at the level of the firm, the industry, and the field.

Keywords

Corporate responsibility Social activism Cybernetic model Dynamic interactions and responses Outcomes 

Abbreviations

BPs

Beer promoters

BSIC

Beer selling industry Cambodia

CR

Corporate responsibility

GHA

Global health affairs

HQs

Headquarters

HR

Human resources

JV

Joint venture

NGO

Non-governmental organization

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  3. Cargill. (2010). Cargill’s position on Sinar Mas (PT-Smart). Press release from Cargill November 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, R. L. (1962). Silent spring. New York: Mariner Books. ISBN 0-618-25305-x.Google Scholar
  5. Constance, D., & Bonanno, A. (2000). Regulating the global fisheries: The world wildlife fund, Unilever, and the marine stewardship council. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis-Walling, P., & Batterman, S. A. (1997). Environmental reporting by the fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management, 21(6), 865–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2008). The diffusion of voluntary international management standards—responsible care, ISO 9000 and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egels-Zandén, N., & Hyllman, P. (2006). Exploring the effects of union–NGO relationships on corporate responsibility: The case of the Swedish clean clothes campaign. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  12. Environmental Defense Fund. (2012). Retrieved August 1, from http://www.edf.org/about/our-mission-and-history.
  13. Fombrun, C. J. (2005). A world of reputation research, analysis and thinking—building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenpeace. (2008). Retrieved April 1, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odI7pQFyjso.
  15. Gorbach, P. M., Sopheab, H., Vonthanak, S., Vun, M. C., Wantha, S. S., & Leng H. B. (2003). Behavioral Sentinel Survey (BSS) V: Sexual behavior among urban sentinel groups, Cambodia 2001. In G. Morineau (Ed.), Retrieved April 15, 2010, from http://www.fhi.org/NR/rdonlyres/ezz6pqawk56o4l3qdseu5oth7ppiuzuy2rhymabr4a6me6pbf2hz6g3yvsxfcgqqhgwhxhk3fkcnhh/BSS5cambodiaenhv.pdf.
  16. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., & Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009). Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1997). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Indochina. (2011). BSIC project monitoring H1—2011 Final Report. Provided by the BSIC upon request.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, R. (2001, July 1). Corporate codes of conduct: Self-regulation in a global economy, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Report. Retrieved April 1, 2011, from http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/0/e3b3e78bab9a886f80256b5e00344278/$FILE/jenkins.pdf.
  21. King, A., & Lennox, M. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industries responsible care program. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, B. G., & Pearce, N. A. (2010). The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klinker, C. (2005). SBS: A Cambodian women’s health initiative endline evaluation report. Prepared for CARE International.Google Scholar
  24. Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. (2002). Promotionalism and subpolitics: Nike and its labor critics. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 541–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Levy, D., Brown, H., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance: The case of the global reporting initiative. Management and Marketing Faculty Publication Series. Paper 1. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://scholarworks.umb.edu/management_marketing_faculty_pubs/1.
  27. Lewicki, R., Gray, B., Elliot, M., et al. (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lowe, P., & Goyder, J. (1983). Environmental groups in politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Lubek, I., Lee, H., Wong, M. L., van Merode, T., Kros, S., McCourt, M., Schuster, J. C., Pagnutti, T., Ganapathi, S., Cadesky, J., Pollock, G., & Idema, R. (2009). La vie d’une vendeuse de bière au Cambodge—à mourir? Cahiers du Genre, 45, 77–102.Google Scholar
  30. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marshall, S., & Stecklow, S. (2000). Bar code: Cambodia’s “beer girls” peddle the product and endure the hassle. The Wall Street Journal (May 31, 2000).Google Scholar
  32. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, E. (2010). Cambodia: A better life for beer girls. FinancialTimes.com. (December 9).
  34. Nestlé. (2010). Introductory remarks of José Lopez for Nestlé at Open forum on Deforestation, One World Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, May 17, Press release from Nestlé.Google Scholar
  35. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, Dec, 57–68.Google Scholar
  37. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Dec, 78–93.Google Scholar
  38. Pretty, J., Smith, G., Goulding, K., Groves, S., Henderson, I., Hine, R., et al. (2008). Multi-year assessment of Unilever’s progress towards agricultural sustainability II: Outcomes for peas (UK), spinach (Germany, Italy), tomatoes (Australia, Brazil, Greece, USA), tea (Kenya, Tanzania, India) and oil palm (Ghana). International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6(1), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinn, I. (2003). SBS: A baseline survey & needs assessment of beer promoters in Phnom Penh. Phnom Penh: CARE International Cambodia.Google Scholar
  40. Rao, H. (2009). Market rebels: How activists make or break radical innovations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43(3), 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roome, N. (2011). A retrospective on globalization and sustainable development: The business challenge of systems organization and systems integration. Journal of Business and Professional Ethics, 30(3&4), 193–228.Google Scholar
  43. Roome, N. (2012). A cybernetic model of corporate responsibility. Sensing changes in business and society. International Journal of Technology Management, 60(1/2), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roome, N., Doove, R.-P., & Posetma, M. (2006). An anatomy of corporate social responsibility: Causal factors in CSR as a social movement and Business practice. In J. Jonker & M. de Witte (Eds.), The challenge of organising and implementing CSR (pp. 78–94). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  45. Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest and identify-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28, 204–219.Google Scholar
  46. Saiia, D. H., Caroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy—when corporate charity begins at home. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schiffrin, A. (1998). Cambodia fears trouble’s brewing with “beer girls”. The Los Angeles Times, p. 14 (August 27).Google Scholar
  48. Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 16(3), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spar, D., & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. United Nations. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, December 11, 1987.Google Scholar
  51. Van der Borght, S., Rinke de Wit, T. F., Janssens, V., Schim van der Loeff, M. F., Rijckborst, H., & Lange, J. M. (2006). HAART for the HIV-infected employees of large companies in Africa. Lancet, 368(9564), 547–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Dyke, N., Soule, S. A., & Taylor, V. (2004). The targets of social movements: Beyond a focus on the state. Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, 25, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the weld: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Van Merode, T. (2006). Antiretrovirals for employees of large companies in Cambodia. The Lancet. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(06)69436-1/fulltext. 16:15 hrs.
  55. Vandekerckhove, W., Leys, J., & Van Braeckel, D. (2008). A speech-act model for talking to management. Building a framework for evaluating communication within the SRI engagement process. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker, E., Martin, A. W., & McCarthy, J. D. (2008). Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 35–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wood, J. D. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Health Organisation. (2011). Global status report on alcohol and health. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/msbgsruprofiles.pdf.
  60. Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katinka C. Van Cranenburgh
    • 1
  • Kellie Liket
    • 2
  • Nigel Roome
    • 3
  1. 1.ESADE Business School, Universitat Ramon LlullInstitute for Social InnovationBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Erasmus Centre for Strategic Philanthropy, Erasmus School of EconomicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Vlerick School of ManagementLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations