Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 215–225

Outing the Silent Partner: Espousing the Economic Values that Operate in Not-For-Profit Organizations



The tension between organizational values and the operation of aged care as a business is often characterized as the “mission versus margin” dilemma. It is common across the industry in both not-for-profit and for-profit organizations. However, in for-profit aged care facilities, there is no question about the intention to make a profit or the purpose of the profits. This is not so clear in not-for-profit aged care organizations. This article explores the tension through the examination of a detailed case study of one of the larger not-for-profit social service organizations—All Saints Christian Care. It analyses the culture and managerial decisions though the lens of the political philosophy value pluralism. Finally, based on the value-plural theory, recommendations are made that would create greater operational transparency in not-for-profit aged care service.


Value pluralism Aged care Not-for-profit 


* Denotes a reference which has been changed to disguise the identity of the case study organization

  1. Aged Care Guide. (2009). Accessed May 2009.
  2. All Saints Christian Care*. (2007a). Annual report 2007 (All Saints Christian Care).Google Scholar
  3. All Saints Christian Care*. (2007b). Mission and values statement (All Saints Christian Care).Google Scholar
  4. All Saints Christian Care*. (2007c). Strategic plan 20092013 (All Saints Christian Care, Sydney).Google Scholar
  5. All Saints Christian Care*. (2008a). About All Saints Christian CareHistory (May 2009).Google Scholar
  6. All Saints Christian Care*. (2008b). Annual Report 2008 (All Saints Christian Care*, NSW & ACT).Google Scholar
  7. Australian National Audit Office. (2003). Managing residential aged care accreditation: The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd., Audit Report No. 42, 2002–2003.Google Scholar
  8. Authors Withheld. (2004). The history of All Saints Christian Care* (All Saints Christian Care).Google Scholar
  9. Billis, D. (1993). Sector blurring and nonprofit centers: The case of the United Kingdom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 241–257.Google Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, J., Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, V. (2007). Regulating aged care. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Branden, N. (2001). The psychology of self esteem. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, W. A., & Yoshioka, C. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chappell, T. (1998). Understanding human goods. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crowder, G. (2003). Pluralism, relativism and liberalism in Isaiah Berlin, Australasian political studies association conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 29 September–1 October. Retrieved 12 June 2006 from
  16. Davidson, B. (2009). For-profit organisation in managed markets for human services. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dearlove, D., & Coomber, S. (1999). Heart and soul and millennial values. Skillman, NJ: Blessing/White.Google Scholar
  18. Dela Rama, M. I., Edwards, M. T., Dalton, B. M., & Green, J. M. (2010). Honourable Intentions? Analysing the interests of private equity in the aged care sector. Third Sector Review, 16(3), 63–82.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Health and Ageing. (2007). New funding model for residential aged care. Accessed 25 July 2011.
  20. DeVaro, J., & Brookshire, D. (2007). Promotions and incentives in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(3), 311–339.Google Scholar
  21. Drucker, P. (1973). Management: Tasks responsibilities practices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Drucker, P. F. (1990). Management the non-profit organization: Practices and principle. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 550–552.Google Scholar
  24. Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George, J., & Napier, L. (1998). Older people deserve better: Frail old people and the Aged Care Act 1997. Paper presented to the 2nd international conference on social work, health and mental health, Melbourne, 12–15 January, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. Green, J. M. (2009). The business of values and value of business: The role of organisational values. In The recruitment and selection of not-for-profit community service managers and executives. Accessed 17 January 2011.
  27. Grey, J. (1997). Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grey, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(April), 835–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansmann, H. B. (1996). The organization of enterprise. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Head, B. (2005). Governance. In P. Saunders & J. Walter (Eds.), Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hogan, W. (2004). Review of pricing arrangements in residential aged care: Summary of the report. Sydney: University of Technology.Google Scholar
  33. Hogan, W. (2008). Economic and financial themes in Australian aged care. Research in International Business and Finance, 22, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hudson, M. (1999). Managing without profit: The art of managing third sector organisations. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. James, E. (1989). Introduction. In E. James (Ed.), The nonprofit sector an international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jamrozik, A. (2006). Social policy in the post-welfare state: Australian society in the 21st century. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Jeavons, T. (1992). When management is the message: Relating values to management practice in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2(4), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaine, S. (2010). Labour management in the residential aged care sector. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  39. Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2007). Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? An empirical analysis of a nonprofit human services agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, D., & Meagher, G. (Eds.). (2009). Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices. Sydney: Sydney University Press. Edited abstract retrieved from
  41. Kouzes, B. (2003). The five practices of exemplary leadership. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  42. Kramer, R. (1987). Voluntary agencies and the personal social services. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. LeMon, C. (2000). Motivating adult employees to grow up. Employment Relations Today, 3(3), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lenocioni, P. M. (2002). Make your values mean something. Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 113–117.Google Scholar
  45. Little, A. (2004). Crossing the great divide: Dilemmas for UK voluntary sector leaders who move into government. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 618–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyons, M. (2001). Third sector. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  47. Marsland, D. (1996). Welfare or welfare state? Contradictions and dilemmas in social policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Martinez, E., & García, A. (2000). What Is “neo-liberalism”? A brief definition. Accessed 25 October 2008.
  49. Mason, E. (2006). Value pluralism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 7 February 2007.
  50. McMullen, K., & Schellenberg, G. (2003). Job quality in nonprofit organizations. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network.Google Scholar
  51. Mirvis, P. (1992). The quality of employment in the nonprofit sector: An update of employee attitudes in nonprofits versus business and governments. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Onyx, J. (1998). Career motivation: A cross sector analysis. Third Sector Review, 4(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
  53. Productivity Commission. (2011). Caring for older Australian. Report no 53, Final Inquiry Report, Canberra.Google Scholar
  54. Pusey, M. (2010). The struggles of public intellectuals in Australia: What do they tell us about contemporary Australia and the Australian “political public sphere”? Thesis Eleven, 101(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rawls, J. (1971). Theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sackman, S. (1991). Cultural knowledge in organisations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Schein, E. H. (1991). The role of the founder in organisational culture. In P. Frost, L. M. Moore, C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organisational culture (pp. 243–253). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Seevers, B. (2000). Identifying and clarifying organizational values. Journal of Agricultural Education, 4(3), 70–79.Google Scholar
  59. Skorupski, J. (1996). Value pluralism. In D. Archard (Ed.), Philosophy and pluralism (pp. 105–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sridhar, K. (2011). A multi-dimensional criticism of the triple bottom line reporting approach. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 6(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staples, J. (2006). NGOs Out in the cold: The Howard Government Policy towards NGOs. Discussion paper 19/06 (June 2006) Democratic Audit of Australia. Canberra: Australian National University. Accessed 15 October 2008.
  62. Sullivan, W., Sullivan, R., & Buffton, B. (2002). Aligning individual and organisational values to support change. Journal of Change Management, 2(3), 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tilse, C. (2002). Cash, customers, and care: The experience and meaning of differential payment for high care places in aged care facilities. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 383–396.Google Scholar
  66. van Staveren, I. (2001). The values of economics; An Aristotelian perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wynne, J. M. (2004). Hazards in the corporatisation of health care. New Doctor 80, 2–5. Accessed 11 January 2007.Google Scholar
  68. Wynne, J. M. (2010). Oh no!—Not another aged care inquiry but this time it might really matter. Corporate Health Care. Accessed 17 January 2011.
  69. Yin, R. (1981). The case study crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(March), 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  71. Zadek, S. (2001). The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. Stirling: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Discipline GroupUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations