Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 203–213

Reciprocity in Corporate Social Responsibility and Channel Performance: Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together?



Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is more and more important in the supply chain. Drawing from the stakeholder theory and channel relational reciprocity literature, we develop and empirically support a theoretical framework. Our framework predicts that CSR reciprocity between buyer and seller firms in a supply chain affects channel tie intensity and channel sales performance (main effects) and that market competition may amplify these influences (moderated effects). The framework reveals important implications regarding the role of reciprocal CSR for channel relationship management.


Channel performance CSR reciprocity Market competition 


  1. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Mazvancheryl, S. K. (2004). Customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 68, 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. W., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bask, A., & Kuula, M. (2011). Measuring supply chain level environmental sustainability—nokia case. International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 3(3), 16–24.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, D. E., Spekma, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucklin, L. P., & Sengtupa, S. (1993). Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushee, B., & Noe, C. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, C., & Jennings, M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher, M., Mena, C., Khan, O., & Yurt, O. (2011). Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Management, 16(2), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  13. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  15. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dwyer, R., Schurr, P., & Oh, S. (1987). Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frazier, G. L., Maltz, E., Antia, K. D., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Distributor sharing of strategic information with suppliers. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, E. H. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
  19. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gravereau, V. P., Konopa, L. J., & Grimm, J. L. (1978). Attitudes of industrial buyers toward selected social issues. Industrial Marketing Management, 7(2), 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gu, F., & Li, J. Q. (2007). The credibility of voluntary disclosure and insider stock transactions. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4), 771–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hietbrink, J. J. C., Berens, G., & van Rekom, J. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a business purchasing context: The role of CSR type and supplier product share size. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoppner, J., & Griffith, D. (2011). The role of reciprocity in clarifying the performance payoff of relational behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 920–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hou, K., & Robinson, D. (2006). Industry concentration and average stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1927–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houston, F. S., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (1987). Marketing and exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jap, S., & Anderson, E. (2007). Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Science, 53(2), 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethic and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  31. Kanji, G. K., & Chopra, P. K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total Quality Management, 21(2), 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krause, D. R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: Introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73, 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luo, X., & Donthu, N. (2006). Marketing’s credibility: A longitudinal investigation of marketing communication productivity (MCP) and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 4, 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luo, X., Homburg, C., & Wieseke, J. (2010). Customer satisfaction, analyst stock recommendations, and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1041–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo, X., Rindfleisch, A., & Tse, D. (2007). Working with rivals: The impact of competitor alliances on financial performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lusch, R. F., & Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matsuno, K., & Mentzer, J. T. (2000). The effects of strategy type on the market orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  46. Mefford, R. N. (2011). The economic value of a sustainable supply chain. Business and Society Review, 116(1), 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murphy, P., & Poist, R. (2002). Socially responsible logistics: An exploratory study. Transportation Journal, 41(4), 23–25.Google Scholar
  48. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2010). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspectives. Journal of Marketing, 65, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenzweig, E., & Roth, A. V. (2004). Towards a theory of competitive progression: Evidence from high-tech manufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 13(4), 354–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salam, M. A. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Samaha, S. A., Palmatier, R. W., & Dant, R. P. (2011). Poisoning relationships: Perceived unfairness in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management—a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sharma, A., Iyer, G. R., Mehrotra, A., & Krishnan, R. (2010). Sustainability and business-to-business marketing: A framework and implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, S. A. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463–490.Google Scholar
  60. Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuli, K. R., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Kohli, A. K. (2010). Ties that bind: The impact of multiple types of ties with a customer on sales growth and sales volatility. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turban, D., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vurro, C., Dacin, M. T., & Perrini, F. (2010). Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: How institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang, H., He, J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The role of economic- and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1265–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Fudan UniversityYangpuChina

Personalised recommendations