Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 117–126 | Cite as

Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises

Article

Abstract

This study investigates how ownership concentration in European multinational firms is associated with these firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). We employ factor analysis on responsibility data from EIRiS and use a regression analysis. Using firm-level data for almost 700 European firms, we find that shareholder concentration is significantly related to such policies. That is, more concentrated ownership goes hand in hand with poorer CSR policies. In our analysis, we control for size, leverage, profitability, industry, and country of origin. We use several indicators for ownership concentration. We also find that with more concentrated ownership, CSR of the firm gets worse. We suggest that especially with large shareholders, CSR would need to be included in their performance assessment.

Keywords

Blockholders  Concentrated ownership Corporate social responsibility Europe Multinational enterprises 

References

  1. Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki, M. (1984). The cooperative game theory of the firm. Clarendon: Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business Society, 41, 319–344.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagat, S., Black, B., & Blair, M. (2004). Relational investing and firm performance. Journal of Financial Research, 27, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, B. S. (1992). Agents watching agents: The promise of institutional investor voice’. UCLA Law Review, 39, 811–893.Google Scholar
  10. Bolton, P., & von Thadden, E. L. (1998). Liquidity and control: A dynamic theory of corporate ownership structure. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154, 177–211.Google Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brammer, J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2008). Corporate social performance and geographical diversification. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, G. L., & Hebb, T. (2005). Why should they care? The role of institutional investors in the market for corporate global responsibility. Environment and Planning A, 37, 2015–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coffey, B., & Fryxell, G. E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1771–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dam, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and financial markets, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  18. Dam, L., Scholtens, B., & Sterken, E. (2007). Corporate covernance and international location decisions of multinational enterprises. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 1329–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derwall, J. (2007) Economic virtues of SRI and CSR. PhD dissertation, University of Maastricht, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  21. Donker, H., & Zahir, S. (2008). Towards an impartial and effective corporate governance rating system. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faccio, M., & Lasfer, M. A. (2000). Do occupational pension funds monitor companies in which they hold large stakes? Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 71–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gomes, A., & W. Novaes (2005) Sharing of Control versus Monitoring as Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Penn Institute for Economic Research Working Paper 1–29, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorton, G., & Schmid, F. A. (2000). Universal banking and the performance of German banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 29–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046.Google Scholar
  28. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katz, B., & Owen, J. (2000) The emergence of concentrated ownership and the rebalancing of portfolios due to shareholder activism in a financial market equilibrium. Stern School of Business Working Paper SOR-2000-1, New York.Google Scholar
  34. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lehmann, E., Warning, S., & Weigand, J. (2004). Governance structures, multidimensional efficiency and firm profitability. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehmann, E., & Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. European Finance Review, 4, 157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Greenwich, CT: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32, 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan, L. V., & Schneider, M. (2002). The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Academy of Management Review, 27, 554–573.Google Scholar
  44. Scholtens, B. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stiglitz, J. E. (1985). Credit markets and the control of capital. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–557.Google Scholar
  49. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wahal, S. (1996). Public pension fund activism and firm performance. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 3, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy and Sustainability Centre, Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations