Will Women Lead the Way? Differences in Demand for Corporate Social Responsibility Information for Investment Decisions
- 774 Downloads
Recent years have featured a leap in academic and public interest in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities and related corporate reporting. Two main themes in this literature are the exploration of management incentives to engage in and disclose this information, and of the use and value of this information to market participants. We extend the second theme by examining the interest that specific investor classes have in the use of CSR information. We rely on feminist intersectionality, which suggests that gender intersects with other identities to yield different values, experiences, and opportunities that can lead to gender-based preferences for CSR information. Based upon a survey of 750 US-based retail investors, we find that female retail investors have a greater interest in the use of CSR information, relative to male retail investors. Women express greater anticipated future demand for this information than do men. Further, the magnitude of the increase from current use to anticipated future demand is greater for women than men. Age is a significant modifying factor in that the discrepancy between women of any age and older men is greater than that between women and younger men. Finally, women also exhibit greater demand for streamlining of the information flow, consistent with pressures induced by time poverty. It appears that current disclosure practices provide a less than optimal match with the needs of the information consumers that are primarily interested in using this information. This mismatch may result in a systematic disenfranchisement of female investing classes which suggests an ethical need to level the playing field.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Investment behavior Gender Feminist intersectionality Ethics
We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and not the views of the FINRA. Finally, we would like to thank the helpful guidance of the editor Gary Monroe, the comments made by two anonymous reviewers and the inspiration of W. H. Holder-Webb.
- Adams, A., Fries, S., & Simnett, R. (2011, May). The journey towards integrative reporting. Accountant’s Digest, Issue 558.Google Scholar
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1994). Improving business reporting—A customer focus: Meeting the information needs of investors and creditors. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
- American Institution of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2006). AICPA work/life and women’s initiatives 2004 research. A decade of changes in the accounting profession: Workforce trends and human capital practices. New York, NY: AICPA.Google Scholar
- Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 5, 111–150.Google Scholar
- Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
- Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2002). Highlights of the national study of the changing workforce, executive summary. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
- Bottero, W. (2000). Gender and the labor market at the turn of the century: Complexity, ambiguity and change. Work, Employment & Society, 14, 781–791.Google Scholar
- Brown-Liburd, H., Cohen, J., & Zamora, T. (2011). The effects of corporate social responsibility investment, assurance and perceived fairness on investors’ judgments. Boston College: Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Employed persons by occupation, sex, and age in household data annual averages. Retrieved from January 5, 2011. ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aat9.txt.
- Cancian, F. M., & Olinker, S. J. (2000). Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- Chua, W. (2006). Extended performance reporting: A review of empirical studies. White paper, Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. Retrieved from January 5, 2011. http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/Industry-Topics/Reporting/Resources-and-toolkits/~/media/Files/Industry%20topics/Reporting/Resources%20and%20toolkits/Reports/EPR_review_of_empirical_studies.ashx.
- Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Drago, R. W. (2007). Striking a balance: Work, family, life. Boston, MA: Dollars & Sense.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Traunter (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2009). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making from accounting conservatism. Troy: Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
- Gelvin, K. (2007). The coming of age of SRI. Financial Planning, 37(8), 56.Google Scholar
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2011). G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.1 Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative. http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/ReportingFrameworkOverview/.
- Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The Timebind. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict (pp. 107–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lattman, P. (2010, September 16). Three women claim gender bias at Goldman. New York Times B1.Google Scholar
- Lewis, A., Webley, P., Winnett, A., & MacKenzie, C. (1998). Morals and markets: Some theoretical and policy implications of ethical investing. In P. Taylor-Goodby (Ed.), Choice & public policy: The limits of welfare markets (pp. 164–182). Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- McKinsey & Co. (2002). Global Investor Opinion Survey: Key Findings. Google Scholar
- Mesch, D. (2010). Women give 2010: Women give more to charity than men, study shows. Women’s Philanthropy Institute. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/womengive/.
- Niessen, A. & Ruenzi, S. (2007). Sex matters: Gender and mutual funds. Working paper, Centre for Financial Research, Cologne. CFR Working Paper No. 06-01.Google Scholar
- Penner, A. M. & Petersen, T. (2004). Race and gender discrimination in a large financial company. Working paper, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Prudential Financial. (2005). Study on the financial experience and behaviors among women. Newark, NJ: Prudential Insurance Company of America.Google Scholar
- Raubenheimer, J. E. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, A., Lloyd, C. B., & Grant, M. (2004). Gender differences in time use among adolescents in developing countries: Implications of rising school enrollment rates. Policy Research Division Working Paper, 193. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
- Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- SEC. (2010). Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml.
- Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). (2008). The investor’s advocate: How the SEC protects investors, maintains market integrity, and facilitates capital formation. Washington, DC: Securities Exchange Commission.Google Scholar
- Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association [SIFMA]. (2008). Equity and bond ownership in America 2008. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and Investment Company Institute, New York.Google Scholar
- Social Investment Forum. (2006). 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the U.S.: 10 Year review. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum Industry Research Program.Google Scholar
- Stempel, J. (2008, April 4). Citigroup confirms $33 mln gender bias settlement. Reuters. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/04/04/citigroup-bias-settlement-idUSN0439827920080404).
- Stempel, J. & Comlay, E. (2009, June 25). Bank of America sued for gender bias over bonuses. Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/25/us-bankofamerica-merrill-bias-lawsuit-idUSTRE55O5AT20090625).
- Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Current population survey, 2011 annual social and economic supplement.Google Scholar
- Wu, Q., Francis, B., & Hasan, I. (2010). The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy.Google Scholar
- Wood, D., & Hoff, B. (2008). The use of non-financial information: What do investors want? White paper report on project findings from the Center for Corporate Citizenship at the Institute for Responsible Investment, Boston College. Prepared for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Investor Education Foundation.Google Scholar
- Worley, D. (1998). Women finding investment a necessity, many band together, create investment clubs, Florida Today, 10 February, p. 12C, cited in J. F. Graham, E. J. Stendardi Jr., J. K. Myers, & M. J. Graham. (2002). Gender Differences in Investment Strategies: An Information Processing Perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26.Google Scholar