Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 707–720

Socially Responsible Investing: An Investor Perspective

Article
  • 2.9k Downloads

Abstract

Given the growing importance of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), it is surprising that there is no consensus of what the term SRI means to an investor. Further, most studies of this question rely solely on the views of investors who already invest in SRI funds. Our study surveys a unique pool of approximately 5,000 investors that contains both investors who have used SRI criteria in investment decisions and those who have not, and involves a broad array of criteria associated with SR investing. Our findings offer new insight into the SRI debate. For both sets of investors, environmental and sustainability issues dominate as the major category associated with SR investing. We find strong agreement in the ranking of the relative importance of various SRI factors despite differences between these two groups in their opinion of their overall importance. We also find that investors prefer to consider the SRI question in more holistic terms rather than using the exclusionary format favored by most SRI funds. Investors seem to prefer to reward firms who display overall positive social behavior rather than to exclude firms on the basis of certain products or practices. These findings can help providers of SR investment vehicles to improve the SRI products that they offer to the general investor, thus both encouraging the initial adoption of SR criteria by investors and increasing overall investment in SR choices.

Keywords

Socially responsible investing Negative screening Investor survey Environment Corporate social responsibility 

References

  1. Beal, D., & Goyen, M. (1998). Putting your money where your mouth is: A profile of ethical investors. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Junkus, J. C., & Berry, T. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474–482.Google Scholar
  5. McLachan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nilsson, J. (2008). Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1991). Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary investigation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate citizenship in a globalized world: introduction to the handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. In A. G. Sherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenam: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shank, T. M., Manullang, D. K., & Hill, R. P. (2005). Is it better to be naughty or nice? Journal of Investing, 14(3), 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible investments. Journal of Investment Consulting, 8(2), 17–37.Google Scholar
  13. Statman, M. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations