Clinical Governance, Performance Appraisal and Interactional and Procedural Fairness at a New Zealand Public Hospital
- 1.1k Downloads
This paper explores the conduct of performance appraisals of nurses in a New Zealand hospital, and how fairness is perceived in such appraisals. In the health sector, performance appraisals of medical staff play a key role in implementing clinical governance, which, in turn, is critical to containing health care costs and ensuring quality patient care. Effective appraisals depend on employees perceiving their own appraisals to be fair both in terms of procedure and interaction with their respective appraiser. We examine qualitative data from interviews and focus groups, involving 22 nurses in a single department, to determine whether perceived injustices impact on the effective implementation of the appraisal system. Our results suggest that particular issues had been causing some sense of injustice, and most of these were procedural. Potential solutions focus on greater formalisation of the performance appraisal process, and more training for appraisers and appraisees.
KeywordsClinical governance Performance appraisal Interactional justice Procedural justice
- Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional injustice, the sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organisational justice (pp. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 14, 129–177.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In M. H. Bazerman, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organisations (pp. 25–41). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
- Linna, A., Elovainio, M., Van den Bos, K., Kivimaki, M., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2012). Can usefulness of performance appraisal interviews change organizational justice perceptions? A 4-year longitudinal study among public sector employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(7), 1360–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McSherry, R., & Pearce, P. (2002). Clinical governance: A guide to implementation for healthcare professionals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Ministerial Task Force on Clinical Leadership. 2009. In good hands: Transforming clinical governance in New Zealand. http://www.aemh.org/pdf/InGoodHandsReport.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2011.
- Murphy, K., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-oriented perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- National Health Board. 2010. Trends in service design and new models of care: A review. http://www.nationalhealthboard.govt.nz/sites/all/files/trends-service-design-new-models-care-jul2010.pdf Accessed 4 Mar 2011.
- Nieswiadomy, R. (2008). Foundations of nursing research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Nursing Council of New Zealand. 2010. Annual report. http://www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/index.cfm/1,48,0,0,html/Annual-Reports 20 Mar 2011.
- Schermerhorn, J. (2009). Exploring management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 25–32.Google Scholar
- Thompson, P. H., & Dalton, G. W. (1970). Performance appraisal: Managers beware. Harvard Business Review, 48(1), 149–157.Google Scholar
- Wright, L., Barnett, P., & Hendry, C. (2001). Clinical leadership and clinical governance: A review of developments in New Zealand and internationally. Wellington: HIIRC.Google Scholar
- Zorn, T. E. (2000). Conducting thematic analyses of interviews and field notes, unpublished paper. Hamilton: Waikato University.Google Scholar