Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 559–568 | Cite as

Can an Ethical Revival of Prudence Within Prudential Regulation Tackle Corporate Psychopathy?

Article

Abstract

The view that corporate psychopathy played a significant role in causing the global financial crisis, although insightful, paints a reductionist picture of what we present as the broader issue. Our broader issue is the tendency for psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism to cluster psychologically and culturally as ‘dark leadership’ within global financial institutions. Strong evidence for their co-intensification across society and in corporations ought to alarm financial regulators. We argue that an ‘ethical revival’ of prudence within prudential regulation ought to be included in any package of solutions. Referencing research on moral muteness and the role of language in framing thoughts and behaviours, we recommend that regulators define prudence in an explicitly normative sense, an approach that may be further strengthened by drawing upon a widely appealing ethic of intergenerational care. An ethical revival of prudence, we argue, would allow the core problems of greed and myopia highlighted by corporate psychopathy theory to be addressed in a politically sensitive manner which recognises the pitfalls of regulating directly against corporate psychopathy. Furthermore, it would provide a viable conceptual framework to guide regulators along the treacherous path to more intrusive cultural regulation.

Keywords

Dark leadership Corporate psychopaths Prudence Regulation Intergenerational care 

References

  1. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. (2007). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Bank of England and Financial Services Authority (BoE and FSA). (2011). The Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority: Our approach to banking supervision. London: BoE and FSA.Google Scholar
  3. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
  4. Boddy, C. R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham, J. (1943). The machiavellians: Defenders of freedom. New York: John Day Co.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, R. W., & Whitten, A. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence. In A. Whitten & R. W. Byrne (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence. II. Extensions and evaluations (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christie, R., & Geis, L. (Eds.). (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cleckley, H. M. (1941). The mask of sanity: An attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. London: Henry Kimpton.Google Scholar
  9. Cohn, C. (1987). Slick Ems, Glick Ems, Christmas Trees and Cookie Cutters—Nuclear language and how we learned to pat the bomb. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 43(5), 17–24.Google Scholar
  10. Conte, H. R., & Plutchik, R. (Eds.). (1995). Ego defenses: Theory and measurement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, J. M. (1975). Reason and human good in Aristotle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Drake, D. S. (1995). Assessing Machiavellianism and morality-conscience guilt. Psychological Reports, 77, 1355–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelman, M. (1985). Political language and political reality. American Political Science Review, 18(1), 10–19.Google Scholar
  14. Elster, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Foster, J. D., Shira, L., & Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal, Relationships, 23, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism. Standard Edition, 14, 67–102.Google Scholar
  18. Galbraith, J. K. (2009). The economics of innocent fraud: Truth for our time. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 32–58.Google Scholar
  20. Gellner, E. (1997). Nationalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgs, M. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly: Leadership and narcissism. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoare, C. H. (2001). Erikson on development in adulthood: New insights from the unpublished papers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoy, T. (1958). The idea of prudential wisdom in politics. The Western Political Quarterly, 11(2), 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karpman, B. (1948). The myth of the psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 104, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kellerman, B. (2004). Leadership: Warts and all. Harvard Business Review, 82, 40–45.Google Scholar
  31. Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. New York: International Universities press.Google Scholar
  33. Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liendo, P. (2001). Business language: A loaded weapon? War metaphors in business. Invenio, 4(6), 43–50.Google Scholar
  36. Lifton, R. J. (1993). The protean self: Human resilience in an age of fragmentation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Little, A. (2006). An interview with wal-mart CEO H. Lee Scott. Grist. http://grist.org/article/griscom-little3. Accessed 9 Nov 2012.
  38. Maccoby, M. (2003). The productive narcissist: The promise and peril of visionary leadership. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  39. Machiavelli, N. (1513/1966). The prince. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  40. Marshall, A. (2007). Vilfredo Pareto’s sociology: A framework for political psychology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  41. Marshall, A., & Guidi, M. (2012). The idea of a sociology of risk and uncertainty: Insight from Pareto. In J. V. Femia & A. Marshall (Eds.), Vilfredo Pareto: Beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 85–110). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Millon, T. (with Davis, R. D. and contributing associates), Millon, C. M., Wenger, A., Van Zuilen, M. H. Fuchs, M., & Millon, R. B. (1996). Disorders of personality: DSM-IV and beyond. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Millon, T., Weiss, L., Millon, C., & Davis, R. (1994). Millon index of personality styles (MIPS) manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  45. Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pareto, V. (1901/1991). The rise and fall of elites. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  47. Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  48. Partnoy, F. (1997). F.I.A.S.C.O.: the inside story of a wall street trader. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  49. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pieper, J. (1966). The four cardinal virtues. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  51. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rebhorn, W. A. (1988). Foxes and lions: Machiavelli’s confidence men. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sankowsky, D. (1995). The charismatic leader as a narcissist: Understanding the abuse of power. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sants, H. (2010). Do regulators have a role to play in judging culture and ethics? Speech to the Chartered Institute of Securities and Investments Conference 17/06/2010.Google Scholar
  55. Skeem, J. L., Polythress, N., Edens, J. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Cale, E. M. (2003). Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 8, 513–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: Free markets and the sinking of the global economy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, C., Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1997). The development of future-oriented prudence and altruism in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 12(2), 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, And. A. (2010). Managing business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). ‘Our common future’, Brundtland Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.University of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations