Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’
- 3.5k Downloads
This article draws on the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant to explore whether a corporate ‘duty of beneficence’ to non-shareholders is consistent with the orthodox ‘shareholder theory’ of the firm. It examines the ethical framework of Milton Friedman’s argument and asks whether it necessarily rules out the well-being of non-shareholders as a corporate objective. The article examines Kant’s distinction between ‘duties of right’ and ‘duties of virtue’ (the latter including the duty of beneficence) and investigates their consistency with the shareholder theory. The article concludes that it is possible within the ethical framework of shareholder theory for managers to pursue directly the happiness of non-shareholders. Furthermore, shareholders have a duty to hold management to account for the moral consequences of the firm’s activities on non-shareholding stakeholders.
KeywordsDeontology Duty of beneficence Friedman Kant Imperfect duties Property rights Shareholder theory Stakeholder theory Shareholder activism
- Blair, M. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, B., Netter, J., & Yang, T. (2010). Are shareholder proposals an important corporate governance device? Evidence from US and UK shareholder proposals. Retrieved April 5, 2012 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1572016.
- Chryssides, G., & Kaler, J. (1993). An introduction to business ethics. Hampshire: Cengage-Learning.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 5, 2012 from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html.
- Goodpaster, K. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
- Gregor, M. (1996). Translator’s note on the text. In Kant, I. & Gregor, M. (Trans.), The metaphysics of morals (pp. xxxii–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1785/1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1797/1996). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics (P. Heath and J. Schneewind, Eds.; P. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mansell, S. (2013). Capitalism, corporations and the social contract: A critique of stakeholder theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, O. (2001). Duty and Obligation. In L. Becker & C. Becker (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Principles for Responsible Investment. (n.d.). The principles for responsible investment. Retrieved April 5, 2012 from http://www.unpri.org/principles/.
- Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (revised edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sacconi, L. (2004). Corporate social responsibility (csr) as a model of “extended” corporate governance. An explanation based on the economic theories of social contract, reputation and reciprocal conformism, Liuc Papers n. 142, Serie Etica, Diritto ed Economica 10.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, E. (2000). Just business: Business ethics in action (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, E. (2004). Corporate governance: Accountability in the marketplace. London: Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).Google Scholar
- Sullivan, R. (1996). Introduction. In Kant, I. & Gregor, M. (Trans.), The metaphysics of morals (pp. vii–xxvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tax Justice Network. (2005a). What is the Tax Justice Network? Retrieved January 9, 2009 from http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcat=53).
- Tax Justice Network. (2005). Tax us if you can: The true story of a global failure. London: Tax Justice Network.Google Scholar
- Timmermann, J. (2013). Kantian dilemmas? Moral conflict in Kant’s ethical theory. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95(1).Google Scholar
- United Nations Global Compact. (n.d.). The ten principles. Retrieved March 29, 2012 from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html.