Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 525–539

An Introduction of Epistemology to Business Ethics: A Study of Marketing Middle-Managers

  • Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas
  • Surendra Arjoon
  • Yusuf Sidani


A vast majority of marketing theory and research has focused on relativism and idealism in order to understand ethical behavior. However, making ethical assessments that in turn influence behavior is much more complicated than it appears. One of the most important developments in contemporary philosophy has been the renewed interest in epistemic virtue. Epistemologists contend that belief is an ethical process that is susceptible to the intellectual virtue or vice of one’s own life and personal experiences. Open-mindedness, curiosity, careful thinking, creativity, and intellectual courage are the foundations of epistemic virtues. Closed-mindedness, intellectual overconfidence, unimaginativeness, intellectual conformity, and wishful thinking are among epistemic vices. The purpose of this investigation is to introduce epistemology to marketing ethics by linking it to personal moral philosophies (idealism and relativism) and optimism to explain various ethically challenging organizational behaviors. The items of epistemology were developed and pretested by the lead author of this study. Structural equations (LISREL) analyses found that epistemic virtues and vices are better predictors of ethical behavior than were personal moral philosophies (idealism and relativism), and their influence on mild and severe levels of unethical behaviors was enhanced by the moderator variable, optimism. Implications are designed to develop suggestions for improving ethical behavior in the workplace.


Epistemic virtues Epistemic vices Idealism Relativism Optimism Virtue theory Unethical organizational practices 


  1. Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arjoon, S. (2005). A communitarian model of business: A natural law perspective. Journal of Markets & Morality, 8(2), 455–478.Google Scholar
  3. Axtell, G. (1998). The role of the intellectual virtues in the reunification of epistemology. Monist, 81(3), 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barclay, D., Thompson, R., & Higgins, C. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brady, M., & Pritchard, D. (2006). Epistemic virtues and virtue epistemology. Philosophical Studies, 130, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bragues, G. (2008). The ancients against the moderns: Focusing on the character of corporate leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenkert, G. G. (2009). Innovation, rule breaking and the ethics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchanan, S. (1925). Possibility or a critical study of intellectual imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buchanan, A. (2009). Philosophy and public policy: A role for social moral epistemonology. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26(3), 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bull, C., & Adam, A. (2011). Virtue ethics and customer relationship management towards a more holistic approach for the development of ‘best practice’. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldwell, C., & Dixon, R. D. (2009). Love, forgiveness, and trust: Critical values of the modern leader. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s105510090184z.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Card, R. F. (2004). Pure aretaic ethics and character. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 38, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, J., Tsou, H., & Huang, A. (2009). Service delivery innovation: Antecedents and impact on firm performance. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corlett, J. A. (2008). Epistemic responsibility. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cotton, M., & Laura, R. (1999). Empathetic education: An ecological perspective on educational knowledge. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  20. Crisp, R., Froding, B., & Roache, R. (2010, January). The good life in an information society: A new account of the epistemic virtues. Presented at a new science of virtues symposium, University of Chicago (pp. 28–30).Google Scholar
  21. Curtis, M. B. (2006). Are auditrelated ethical decisions dependent upon mood? Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Driver, J. (2003). The conflation of moral and epistemic virtue. Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flood, A. (2008). Epistemic badness. Journal of Philosophical Research, 33, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foltz, G. J., & Miller, N. (1994). Beliefs and values questionnaire (BVQ). In O. C. Ferrell & J. Fraedrich (Eds.), Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (pp. 326–328). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1365–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsyth, D. K. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Individual differences in information integration during moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Forsyth, D. R., & Nye, J. (1990). Personal moral philosophies and moral choice. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J., & Kelley, K. (1988). Idealism, relativism, and the ethic of caring. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., & Sutton, J. (Eds.). (2000). Descartes’ natural philosophy routledge studies in seventeenth century philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Gender Affairs Division Ministry. (2009, June). National policy on gender and development of the republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Draft Document.Google Scholar
  34. Gellert, F., & Schalk, R. (2012). Agerelated: Attitudes the influence on relationships and performance at work. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(1), 98–117.Google Scholar
  35. Goldberg, S. (2009). The social virtues: Two accounts. Acta Analytica, 24(4), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greene, J., & Brown, S. (2009). The wisdom development scale: Further validity investigations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 68(4), 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: PrenticeHall, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural’s consequences: International differences in workrelated values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Cambridge: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  40. Hoogh, A., & Hartog, D. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multimethod study. Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hookway, C. (2006). Reasons for belief, reasoning, virtues. Philosophical Studies, 130(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In N. C. Smith & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  44. Hursthouse, R. (1999). Introduction. In G. Harman (Ed.), On virtue ethics (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Issa, T., & Pick, D. (2010). Ethical mindsets: An Australian study. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1986). Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL VII: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Karande, K., Rao, C. P., & Singhapakdi, A. (2002). Moral philosophies of marketing managers: A comparison of American Australian, and Malaysian cultures. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7/8), 768–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kawall, J. (2002). Other regarding epistemic virtues. Ratio, 15(3), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  51. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays in moral development: The philosophy of moral development, Vol. 1. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  52. Lahroodi, R. (2006). Evaluational internalism, epistemic virtues, and the significance of trying. Journal of Philosophical Research, 31, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lahroodi, R. (2007). Evaluating need for cognition: A case study in naturalistic epistemic virtue theory. Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leary, M. R., Knight, P. D., & Barnes, B. D. (1986). Ethical ideologies of the Machiavellian. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Legge, J. (2000). translation of Zhuangzi, Open image in new window (“The Floods of Autumn”) and Open image in new window (“Perfect Enjoyment”), Chinese text.Google Scholar
  56. Lourenco, O. (1996). Reflections on narrative approaches to moral development. Human Development, 39(2), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Love, P. G., & Simmons, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32(4), 539–550.Google Scholar
  58. Maldonado, C., Ramirez, T., Vazquez, I., & MedinaBorja, A. (2007). More females than males? Deciphering the psychosocial characteristics that attract girls into IE in Puerto Rico. In IIE Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 1053–1059).Google Scholar
  59. McCloskey, D. (2007). The Bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R. (1991). Who blows the whistle and why? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(1), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Montmarquet, J. (2008). The voluntariness of virtue—and belief. Philosophy, 83(325), 373–390.Google Scholar
  62. Morton, A. (2004). Epistemic virtues, metavirtues, and computational complexity. Nous, 38(3), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Newstead, S., FranklynStokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  65. Page, J. S. (2008). Peace education: Exploring ethical and philosophical foundations. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A metaanalysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piaget, J. (1983). Possibility and necessity: The role of possibility in cognitive development (Vol. 2). Paris: Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  68. Pojman, L.P., & Fieser, J. (2009). Virtue theory. In C. Baxter (Ed.), Ethics: Discovering right and wrong (6th ed., pp. 146–169). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  69. Rawwas, M. Y. A., AlKhatib, J., & Vitell, S. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A crosscultural comparison of U.S. and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Isakson, H. (2000). Ethics of tomorrow’s business managers: The influence of personal beliefs and values, individual characteristics, and the opportunity to cheat. Journal of Education for Business, 75(6), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Singhapakdi, A. (1998). Do consumers’ ethical beliefs vary with age? A substantiation of Kohlberg’s typology in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 26–38.Google Scholar
  72. Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & AlKhatib, J. (2006). Does religion matter? A comparison of the ethical beliefs of marketing students of religious and secular universities in Japan. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Isakson, H. (2007). A comparative study of ethical beliefs of MBA students in the U.S. and those in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Business, 82(3), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer ethics: A cross cultural study of the ethical beliefs of turkish and american consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Riggs, W. (2010). Openmindedness. Metaphilosophy, 41(1/2), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shainess, N. (1993). Ruminations on chivalry. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 29(1), 144–152.Google Scholar
  77. Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. New York: Pantheon Books, A Division of Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  78. Sidani, Y., Rawwas, M. Y. A., Bunker, M., & Vitell, S. (2010). Ethical beliefs of American and Turkisk MBA students: A crosscultural study. Marketing Management Journal, 20(2), 193–220.Google Scholar
  79. Stern, C., & Deimler, M. (2006). The Boston consulting group on strategy: Classic concepts and new perspectives (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  80. Todd, J. (2007). Numerous ways to be an openminded organization: A reply to lahroodi. Social Epistemology, 21(4), 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trevino, L., Weaver, K., & Gary, R. (2001, October). Organizational justice and ethics program followthrough: Influences on employees’ harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 651–665.Google Scholar
  82. Vakoch, D. A. (1996, August). Predictors of prognosis for patients with interpersonal problems: The role of therapists’ epistemology. Experience, optimism, and theoretical orientation, PhD dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  83. Vitell, S. J., Nwachukwu, S. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decisionmaking: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vollmer, D. (2005, May). Employment strategies of workers over the age of 50. A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of management in organizational leadership, University of Phoenix.Google Scholar
  85. Wagner, P. (2008). Review—A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge by Earnest Sosa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Weber, J. (1993). Exploring the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning. Human Relations, 46(4), 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Werhane, P. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Williams, O. F., & Murphy, P. E. (1992). The ethics of virtue: A moral theory for business. In O. Williams & J. Houck (Eds.), A virtuous life in business (pp. 9–27). Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  89. Wood, W. (1998). Epistemology: Becoming intellectually virtuous. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
  90. Yu, W. (2003). Chinese text (not translated). In L. Jun Ying (Eds.).Google Scholar
  91. Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zajac, G. (1996). Beyond Hammurabi: A public service definition of ethics failure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 145–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zarkovich, E., & Upshur, R. (2002). The virtues of evidence. Theoretical Medicine, 23, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas
    • 1
  • Surendra Arjoon
    • 2
  • Yusuf Sidani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA
  2. 2.University of the West Indies/Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of BusinessSt. Augustine, TrinidadWest Indies
  3. 3.American University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations