Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 173–187 | Cite as

Sustainability, Epistemology, Ecocentric Business, and Marketing Strategy: Ideology, Reality, and Vision

Article

Abstract

This conceptual article examines the relationship between marketing and sustainability through the dual lenses of anthropocentric and ecocentric epistemology. Using the current anthropocentric epistemology and its associated dominant social paradigm, corporate ecological sustainability in commercial practice and business school research and teaching is difficult to achieve. However, adopting an ecocentric epistemology enables the development of an alternative business and marketing approach that places equal importance on nature, the planet, and ecological sustainability as the source of human and other species’ well-being, as well as the source of all products and services. This article examines ecocentric, transformational business, and marketing strategies epistemologically, conceptually and practically and thereby proposes six ecocentric, transformational, strategic marketing universal premises as part of a vision of and solution to current global un-sustainability. Finally, this article outlines several opportunities for management practice and further research.

Keywords

Sustainability Ecocentric business Epistemology Transitional Transformational Marketing strategy Vision 

References

  1. Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee, S. B., Chio, V., & Mir, R. (2009). Organizations, markets and imperial formations: Towards an anthropology of globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. L. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Borland, H. (2009a). Conceptualising global strategic sustainability and corporate transformational change. International Marketing Review, 26(4/5), 554–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borland, H. (2009b). Definitions, theories, drivers and managerial implications: Grounding global strategic sustainability, Academy of Marketing Science Conference, May, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  7. Bosselmann, K. (1995). When two worlds collide: Society and ecology. Auckland: RSVP Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Capra, F. (2004). The hidden connections: A science for sustainable living. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Tallman, S. (2005). Cooperative strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Closs, D., Speier, C., & Meacham, N. (2011). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: The role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics and the future. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Cronin, J. J., Smith, J., Gleim, M., Ramirez, E., & Martinez, J. (2011). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curry, P. (2011). Ecological ethics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, J. (2006). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin: London.Google Scholar
  15. Diesendorf, M., & Hamilton, C. (Eds.). (1997). Human ecology, Human economy: Ideas towards an ecologically sustainable future. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Du Nann Winter, D., & Koger, S. (2004). The psychology of environmental problems (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Eurospan.Google Scholar
  17. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekins, P. (2000). Economic growth and environmental sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, N., Fitchett, J., Higgins, M., Jack, G., Lim, M., Saren, M., et al. (2011). Marketing: A critical textbook. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.Google Scholar
  21. Grönroos, C. (2007). In search of a new logic for marketing. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Guest, R. (2010). The economics of sustainability in the context of climate change: An overview. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2003). The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 61–68.Google Scholar
  24. Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  25. Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76.Google Scholar
  26. Hart, S. (2007). Capitalism at the crossroads (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson/Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Hart, S., & Milstein, M. (1999). Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
  28. Hart, S., & Milstein, M. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: Market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iyer, G. (1999). Business, consumers and sustainable living in an interconnected world: A multilateral ecocentric approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values, discourses and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kilbourne, W. E. (1998). Green marketing: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kilbourne, W. E. (2008). How macro should macromarketing be? Journal of Macromarketing, 28(2), 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kilbourne, W. E., Beckman, S. C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the DSP in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, A. (1995). Avoiding ecological surprise: Lessons from long-standing communities. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 961–985.Google Scholar
  37. Leadbitter, J. (2002). PVC and sustainability. Progress in Polymer Science, 27(10), 2197–2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leopold, A. (1970). A Sand County almanac with essays on conservation from Round River. New York, NY: Ballantine. (original work published in 1949).Google Scholar
  39. Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organisational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the bottom of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 106–113.Google Scholar
  41. Lovelock, J. (2000). The ages of Gaia: A biography of our living earth. New York, NY: Bantam.Google Scholar
  42. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  43. Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mittelstaedt, J., & Kilbourne, W. (2006). Macromarketing as agrology: Macromarketing theory and the study of the Agora. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mort, G. S. (2010). Sustainable business. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Naess, A. (1995). Self realisation: An ecological approach to being in the world. Perth: Murdoch University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 90(5), 57–64.Google Scholar
  48. Odum, E. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
  49. Peattie, K. L. (1999). Rethinking marketing: Shifting to a greener paradigm. In M. Charter & J. Polonsky (Eds.), Greener marketing: A global perspective on greening marketing practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Porritt, J. (2007). Capitalism as if the world matters. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 93(1), 79–93.Google Scholar
  52. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.Google Scholar
  53. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Towards a new conception of the environment: Competitiveness relationships. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy and Business, 26(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
  55. Pujari, D., Peattie, K. L., & Wright, G. (2004). Organisational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. L. (2003). Green and competitive: Influences on Environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 657–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1053–1089.Google Scholar
  58. Rolston, H. (1994). Conserving natural values. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schultze, U., & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don’t know: Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 549–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seitz, M., & Peattie, K. L. (2004). Meeting the closed-loop challenge: The case of remanufacturing. California Management Review, 46(2), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Senge, P., & Carstedt, G. (2001). Innovating our way to the next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 24–38.Google Scholar
  63. Sharma, A., Iyer, G., Mehrotra, A., & Krishnan, R. (2010). Sustainability and business-to-business marketing: A framework and implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma, S., Pablo, A., & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma, S., Starik, M., & Husted, B. (2007). Organizations and the sustainability mosaic: Crafting long-term ecological and societal solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  66. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organisational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.Google Scholar
  68. Slater, S. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Olson, E. M. (2007). On the importance of matching strategic behaviour and target market selection. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smart, B. (2010). Consumer society: Critical issues and environmental consequences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  70. Spilhaus, A. (1972). Ecolibrium, Science, 175(4023), 711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Starik, M., & Marcus, A. (2000). Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stead, W. E., & Stead, J. G. (2004). Sustainable strategic management. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  73. Unruh, G., & Ettenson, R. (2010). Growing green: Three smart paths to developing sustainable products. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 94–100.Google Scholar
  74. Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: Domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Varey, R. J. (2010). ‘Marketing means and ends for a sustainable society: A welfare agenda for transformative change. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Varey, R. J. (2011). A sustainable society logic for marketing. Social Business, 1(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wallerstein, I. M. (1993). World system vs. world-systems, a critique. In A. G. Frank & B. Gills (Eds.), The world-system: Five hundred years or five thousand. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future (The Brundtland Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Worster, D. (1977). Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Young, W., & Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2000). Spiritual intelligence: The ultimate intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  82. Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2004). Spiritual capital: Wealth we can live by. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aston Business SchoolAston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Cardiff Business SchoolUniversity of CardiffCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations