Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 123–136 | Cite as

Bringing Back the Essence of the “S” and “R” to CSR: Understanding the Limitations of the Merchant Trade and the White Man’s Burden

  • Caterina Francisco Lorenzo-Molo
  • Zenon Arthur Siloran Udani


One of the fundamental struggles in corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the uncertainty and inherent contradictions that stem from a company being an individual legal entity and a community of persons. The authors contend that CSR has departed from the essence of “social responsibility.” The paper is a commentary on CSR, presented as two frameworks rooted in individualism—The Merchant Trade (the strategic view of CSR) and The White Man’s Burden (self-righteous CSR heroism that assumes the shackles of responsibility normally offered by others). Both, however, contradict the essence of “social responsibility” pitting individual against community, business against society, and economic needs and realities versus ethical reflection. The authors present a model that advocates a more moderate and realistic approach to CSR that goes back to the essence of social responsibility.


Corporation Social responsibility Merchant White Man’s Burden Relational capability 


  1. Andelman, D. (2008). A shattered peace. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badaracco, J. (2006). Questions of character: Illuminating the heart of leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balch, D., & Armstrong, R. (2009). Ethical marginality: The Icarus syndrome and banality of wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bay, D., McKeage, K., & McKeage, J. (2008). An historical perspective on the interplay of Christian thought and business ethics. Business & Society, 49(4), 652–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, S., Chung-hee Kim, R., & O’Gorman, K. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brantlinger, P. (2007). Kipling’s ‘The White Man’s Burden’ and its afterlives. English Literature in Transition, 1800–1920, 50(2), 172–191.Google Scholar
  9. Broadhurst, A. (2000). Corporations and the ethics of social responsibility: An emerging regime of expansion and compliance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2 April), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, R. (2008). Sea change: Santa Barbara and the eruption of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. (2006). Institutional analysis of the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. In D. Mele (Ed.), Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Review article: Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.Google Scholar
  16. DTI. (2002). Social enterprise: A strategy for success.
  17. Dolwick, J. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: Introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 4, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fairbrass, J., & Zueva-Owens, A. (2012). Review article: Conceptualising corporate social responsibility: ‘Relational governance’ assessed, augmented, and adapted. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). Review article: The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson, K. (2011). Toward an intermediate position on corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). Review article: The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graafland, J. (2009). Do markets crowd out virtues? Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenleaf, R. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gross, E. (1980). Organizational structure and organizational crime. In G. Geis & E. Stotland (Eds.), White-collar crime: Theory and research, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Haake, S. (2002). National business systems and industry-specific competitiveness. Organization Studies, 23(5), 711–736.Google Scholar
  27. Hadreas, P. (2002). Aristotle on the vices and virtue of wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartman, E. (2007). Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: A virtue-based approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kallio, T. (2007). Review article: Taboos in corporate social responsibility discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly, M., & White, A. (2009). From corporate responsibility to corporate design. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33(Spring), 23–27.Google Scholar
  31. Klein, T., & Laczniak, G. (2009). Applying Catholic social teachings to ethical issues in marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(3), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kodish, S. (2006). The paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krumwiede, D., Hackert, A., Tokle, J., & Vokurka, R. (2012). Review article: The practice of corporate social responsibility in different countries: A study of firms in Canada, Hungary, Italy, Lebanon, Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Management, 29, 389–402.Google Scholar
  34. Laczniak, G., & Michie, D. (1979). The social disorder of the broadened concept of Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(3), 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. In S. Kodish (Ed.), The Paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.Google Scholar
  36. MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  37. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Review article: ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Review article: Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melé, D. (2012). Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 159–174.Google Scholar
  41. Mitchell, H. (1999). Roots of wisdom. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  42. Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27, 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neron, P., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship Inc.: Do we really want business to be good corporate citizens. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pohle, G., & Hittner, J. (2008). Attaining sustainable growth through corporate social responsibility. IBM Institute for Business Value.
  45. Polonsky, M., & Wood, G. (2001). Can the overcommercialization of cause-related marketing harm society. Journal of Macromarketing, 21(8), 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Renouard, C. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richter, U. (2010). Review article: Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ripken, S., & Fordham, K. (2009). Corporations are people too: A multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood problem. Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 15(1), 97–177.Google Scholar
  49. Ron, S., & Surendra, A. (2010). Review article: Corporate social responsibility in Caribbean community: Lessons from Trinidad and Tobago. Advances in Management, 3, 18–23.Google Scholar
  50. Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9(2), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaker, F. (1970). The multinational corporation: The new imperialism? Columbia Journal of World Business, 5(November–December), 80–84.Google Scholar
  52. Solomon, R. (1994). The corporation as community. A reply to Ed Hartman. In D. Melé (Ed.), The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.Google Scholar
  53. Solomon, R. (2004). Aristotle, ethics, and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tengblad, S., & Ohlsson, C. (2010). Review article: The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of a national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). Review article: The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitley, R. (2005). How national are business systems? In G. Morgan, R. Whitley & E. Moen (Eds.), Changing capitalisms? (pp. 190–225). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Windsor, D. (2006). Review article: Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolff, R. (1970). Economics of imperialism, modern imperialism: The view from the metropolis. American Economic Review, 60(2), 225–230.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caterina Francisco Lorenzo-Molo
    • 1
  • Zenon Arthur Siloran Udani
    • 2
  1. 1.School of CommunicationUniversity of Asia and the Pacific (UA&P)Pasig, Metro ManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of MacauTaipaMacau SAR

Personalised recommendations