Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 379–394 | Cite as

Leadership Discourse, Culture, and Corporate Ethics: CEO-speak at News Corporation

  • Joel Amernic
  • Russell Craig
Article

Abstract

We explore the language of leadership of global media mogul Rupert Murdoch in 2010, the year before the phone-hacking scandal in the UK came to public attention. Subsequent public enquiries in the UK exposed unethical conduct by staff of News Corporation, a global corporation whose Chairman and CEO was Rupert Murdoch. We focus on the ethical climate fashioned by ‘A Letter from Rupert Murdoch’ that appeared in the opening pages of the annual report of News Corporation for the year ended 30 June 2010. Plausibly, Murdoch’s discourse in that letter helped condition the inapt, unethical conduct of News Corporation staff. We highlight the cultural and ethical signs that were embedded in Murdoch’s letter and which reflected the company’s tone at the top and ethical values. We identify signs of a perverse leadership thinking that possibly help explain the inappropriate cultural values and ethical behaviours that were revealed subsequently in evidence presented to public inquiries.

Keywords

Culture Discourse Ethics Leadership Rupert Murdoch News Corporation 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Amir, E. (1996). The association between the information contained in the president’s letter to shareholders and accounting market variables. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23, 1157–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amernic, J., & Craig, R. (2006). CEO-speak: The language of corporate leadership. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amernic, J. H., & Craig, R. J. (2010). Accounting as a facilitator of extreme narcissism. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2007). The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch’s letters to stockholders of General Electric. Human Relations, 60(12), 1839–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2010). Measuring and assessing ‘tone at the top’ using annual report CEO letters. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.Google Scholar
  6. Arsenault, A., & Castells, M. (2008). Switching power: Rupert Murdoch and the global business of media politics. International Sociology, 23(4), 488–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Bettman, J. R., & Weitz, B. A. (1983). Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boddy, C. R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, N., & Conroy, J. P. (2012). Executive hubris: The case of a bank CEO, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(7).Google Scholar
  11. Browne, J. (with P. Anderson). (2010). Beyond business: An inspirational memoir from a visionary leader. Oxford: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  12. Cheney, G. (1998). It’s the economy, stupid! A rhetorical-communicative perspective on today’s market. Australian Journal of Communication, 25, 25–44.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, T. (2012). Stay on message: Poetry and truthfulness in political speech. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, R., & Amernic, J. (2004). Enron discourse: The rhetoric of a resilient capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(6/7), 813–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig, R., & Amernic, J. (2011). Detecting linguistic traces of destructive narcissism at-a-distance in a CEO’s letter to shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egan, M. (2012, June 13). Despite resistance, boards shift toward breaking up CEO. Chair Roles. Last visited September 2, 2012, from www.foxbusiness.com.
  18. Hare, R. D. (1994). Predators: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Psychology Today, 27(1), 54–61.Google Scholar
  19. Hargie, O., Stapleton, K., & Tourish, D. (2010). Interpretations of CEO public apologies for the banking crisis: Attributions of blame and avoidance of responsibility. Organization, 17(6), 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, R. P. (2000). DICTION 5.0. Austin, TX: Digitex.Google Scholar
  21. Heffernan, M. (2011). Willful blindness. Canada: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee. (2012). News international and phone-hacking. Eleventh Report of Session 2010–2012, Vol. I, April 30.Google Scholar
  23. Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, M. J., & Shoemaker, P. A. (1994). Accounting narrative: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142–184.Google Scholar
  25. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lane, A. (2011). Hack work. The New Yorker. August 1.Google Scholar
  29. Mallick, H. (2011). Lack of knowledge an asset for the Murdoch’s. The Star. Last visited July 20, 2011, from http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/1027278-mallick-lack-of-knowledge-an-asset-for-the-murdochs.
  30. Montgomery, C. A. (2008). Putting leadership back into strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 54–60.Google Scholar
  31. Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nünning, A., Grabes, H., & Baumbach, S. (2009). Introduction: Metaphors as a way of worldmaking, or: Where metaphors and culture meet. In H. Grabes, A. Nünning, & S. Baumbach (Eds.), Metaphors shaping culture and theory (pp. xi–xxv). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Owen, D. (2011). Psychiatry and politicians—afterword: Commentary on … ‘Psychiatry and politicians’. The Psychiatrist Online, 35, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen, D., & Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US presidents and UK prime ministers over the last 100 years. Brain, 132(5), 1396–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). The new rhetoric: A treatise in argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Reprint 1969.)Google Scholar
  37. Petersoo, P. (2007). What does ‘we’ mean? National deixis in the media. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(3), 419–436.Google Scholar
  38. Raskin, R., & Shaw, R. (1988). Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. Journal of Personality, 56(2), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, G. (2011). Psychiatry and politicians: The ‘hubris syndrome’. The Psychiatrist Online, 35, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salancik, G. R., & Meindl, J. R. (1984). Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheff, T. J. (1997). Emotions, the social bond, and human reality: Part/whole analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seidler, M. S. (1974). American big business ideology: A content analysis of executives’ speeches. American Sociological Review, 39, 802–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65(19), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, G. W. (2007). Gonzales pleads the Ken Lay defense. Huffington Post, March 14. last visited July 20, 2011, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-w-smith/gonzales-pleads-the-ken-l_b_43426.html.
  45. Su, L. I. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 589–613.Google Scholar
  46. Timuçin, M. (2010). Different language styles in newspapers: An investigative framework. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 104–126.Google Scholar
  47. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vignone, M. J. (2012). Family, buildings, and wars: Organizational conceptual metaphors. OD Practitioner, 44(1), 34–37.Google Scholar
  49. Vo, T. T. (2010). To be or not to be both CEO and Board Chair. Brooklyn Law Review, 76, 65–129.Google Scholar
  50. Welch, J. (with Byrne, J. A.) (2001). Jack: Straight from the gut. New York, NY: Warner.Google Scholar
  51. Werth, P. (1994). Extended metaphor—A text-world account. Language and Literature, 3(2), 79–103.Google Scholar
  52. Wu, Y. (2009). On the relationship between metaphor and cultural models—With data from Chinese and English language. metaphorik.de, 17, 115–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joseph L. Rotman School of ManagementUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Accounting and FinanceVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations