Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

The Organizational Implementation of Corporate Citizenship: An Assessment Tool and its Application at UN Global Compact Participants

  • Dorothée Baumann-PaulyEmail author
  • Andreas Georg Scherer


The corporate citizenship (CC) concept introduced by Dirk Matten and Andrew Crane has been well received. To this date, however, empirical studies based on this concept are lacking. In this article, we flesh out and operationalize the CC concept and develop an assessment tool for CC. Our tool focuses on the organizational level and assesses the embeddedness of CC in organizational structures and procedures. To illustrate the applicability of the tool, we assess five Swiss companies (ABB, Credit Suisse, Nestlé, Novartis, and UBS). These five companies are participants of the UN Global Compact (UNGC), currently the largest collaborative strategic policy initiative for business in the world ( This study makes four main contributions: (1) it enriches and operationalizes Matten and Crane’s CC definition to build a concept of CC that can be operationalized, (2) it develops an analytical tool to assess the organizational embeddedness of CC, (3) it generates empirical insights into how five multinational corporations have approached CC, and (4) it presents assessment results that provide indications how global governance initiatives like the UNGC can support the implementation of CC.


Corporate citizenship CSR Globalization Organizational implementation UN Global Compact 



The authors acknowledge the support by the Swiss National Science Foundation for the project “Corporate Legitimacy and Corporate Communication—A Meso Level Analysis of Organizational Structures within Global Business Firms” (Projekt No. 100014_129995).


  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organizational Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee, S. G. (1998). Corporate environmentalism: Perspectives from organizational learning. Management Learning, 1998, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Baumann, D. (2005). UBS und Credit Suisse Group und der Global Compact. Eine Analyse des Unternehmensumfeldes zur Klärung des bluewashing Vorwurfes. Unpublished semester paper. University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L., & Scherer, A. G. (2011). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms -size matters, University of Zurich, Chair of Foundations of Business Administration and Theories of the Firm, Working Paper No. 204, December 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breitsohl, I. (2010). The roles of preventability and conformance in organizational responses to legitimacy threats. Working Paper. University of Wuppertal.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). The emergence of corporate citizenship: Historical development and alternative perspectives. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 25–49). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance. Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deva, S. (2006). Global compact: A critique of the UN’s ‘public-private partnership for promoting corporate citizenship. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Communication, 34, 107–151.Google Scholar
  12. den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism. How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eden, L., Hermann, C., & Li, D. (2005). Bringing case studies back. In Qualitative research in international business. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez, M. F., & Randall, D. M. (1992). The nature of social desirability response effect in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview. From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695–727). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. Frank, D. (2005). Nestlé und der UN Global Compact—analyse des unternehmensumfeldes seit dem Beitritt. Unpublished semester paper. University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  17. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gasser, U. (2006). Corporate social responsibility. What is the meaning of the ‘sphere of influence’. Law and Information.
  19. Global Reporting Initiative, GRI. (2006). UN Global Compact and Global Reporting Initiative form strategic alliance move to further advance responsible corporate citizenship. Press release, Amsterdam 9 October, 2006.
  20. Greve, H., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsieh, N. (2009). Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing public goods. Managing globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods. International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laufer, W. S. (2006). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: from domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mirvis, Ph, & Googins, B. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Missbach, A. (2010). Without Map or Compass. Credit Suisse, UBS, and Human Rights. A Declaration of Berne Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  31. Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. (2006). SMEs and CSR. An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nolan, J. (2005). The United Nations Global Compact with business: Hindering or helping the protection of human rights? The University of Queensland Law Journal, 24, 445–466.Google Scholar
  33. Novartis (2005). Corporate citizenship at Novartis begins with the success of our core business.
  34. Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(February), 106–117.Google Scholar
  35. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Post, J. E., & Altman, B. W. (1992). Models for corporate greening: How corporate social policy and organizational learning inform leading-edge environmental management. In J. Post (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Policy and Performance, (Vol. 13, pp. 3–29). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
  37. Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Santoro, M. A. (2000). Profits and principles. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Toward a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue. Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. & Seidl, D. (2008). Legitimacy strategies as complexity reduction in a post-national world: A systems-theory perspective. Paper presented at the Organization Studies summer workshop, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  42. Seiler, A. (2005). ABB und der UN Global Compact—analyse des unternehmensumfeldes seit dem Beitritt. Unpublished semester paper. University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  43. Sethi, P. (2003). Global compact is another exercise in futility. Financial Express, September 8.Google Scholar
  44. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. A practical handbook. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  45. Spence, L. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: The five ‘C’s of CSR and small business research agenda. Business and Society Review, 112, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stansbury, J., & Barry, B. (2007). Ethics programs and the paradox of control. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  48. Steinmann, H. (2007). Corporate ethics and globalization. Global rules and private actors. In G. Hanekamp (Ed.), Business ethics of innovation (pp. 7–26). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinmann, H., & Olbrich, Th. (1998). Ethik-management: Integrierte steuerung ethischer und ökonomischer prozesse. In G. Blickle (Ed.), Ethik in organisationen (pp. 95–115). Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
  50. Stubbart, C., & Smalley, R. (1999). The deceptive allure of stage models of strategic processes. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(3), 273–286.Google Scholar
  51. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  52. Waddock, S. (2008). Corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship: The development of a construct. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 50–73). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. Weber, M. (2005). Novartis und der UN Global Compact—analyse des unternehmensumfeldes seit dem Beitritt. Unpublished semester paper. University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  54. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolf, K. D. (2005). The potential and limits of private self-regulation as an effective and legitimate mode of governance. Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics, 6(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
  56. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(December), 125–132.Google Scholar
  57. Zillich, H. (2003). Die Umsetzung des UN Global Compact in der Schweiz. Erhebung über die Tätigkeiten von acht beteiligten Schweizer Unternehmen. Unpublished semester paper. University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  58. Zürn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation state: The EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 182–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zürn, M. (2002). From interdependence to globalization. In W. von Calsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 235–254). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2002). The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar case. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothée Baumann-Pauly
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Andreas Georg Scherer
    • 1
  1. 1.IBW/University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.HEC/University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations