Can an Industry Be Socially Responsible If Its Products Harm Consumers? The Case of Online Gambling
Online gambling companies claim that they are ethical providers. They seem committed to corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices that are aimed at preventing or minimising the harm associated with their activities. Our empirical research employed a sample of 209 university student online gamblers, who took part in an online survey. Our findings suggest that the extent of online problem gambling is substantial and that it adversely impacts on the gambler’s mental and physical health, social relationships and academic performance. Online problem gambling seems to be related to the time spent on the Internet and gambling online, parental/peer gambling and binge drinking. As our findings show that there are harmful repercussions associated with online gambling, we argue that companies in this controversial sector cannot reach the higher level of CSR achieved by other industries. Nevertheless, they can gain legitimacy on the basis of their CSR engagement at a transactional level, and so, by meeting their legal and ethical commitments and behaving with transparency and fairness, the integrity of the company can be ensured. We also argue that current failures in the implementation and control of CSR policies, the reliance on revenue from problem gamblers’ losses, and controversial marketing activities appear to constitute the main obstacles in the prevention or minimisation of harm related to online gambling. As online gambling companies must be responsible for the harm related to their activities, we suggest that CSR policies should be fully implemented, monitored and clearly reported; all forms of advertising should be reduced substantially; and unfair or misleading promotional techniques should be banned. The industry should not rely on revenue from problem gamblers, nor should their behaviour be reinforced by marketing activities (i.e. rewards). We realise, however, that it is unrealistic to expect the online gambling industry to prioritise harm prevention over revenue maximisation. Policy makers and regulators, therefore, would need to become involved if the actions suggested above are to be undertaken. CSR is paramount to minimise harm and provide a healthier user experience in this business sector, but it also poses marketing dilemmas. We support a global collaborative approach for the online gambling industry, as harm related to gambling is a public health issue.
KeywordsCSR in controversial industries CSR in online gambling CSR and gambling addiction Marketing activities in the online gambling industry
- Action on Smoking and Health (ASH). (2012). Smoking statistics: Who smokes and how. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_106.pdf.
- Australian Medical Association (AMA). (2001, January 1). Problem gambling. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://ama.com.au/youthhealth/gambling.
- Australasian Gaming Council. (2008, November). Factsheet AGC FS 17/08. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.austgamingcouncil.org.au/images/pdf/Fact_Sheets/agc_fs17whatispg.pdf.
- British Medical Association (BMA). (2007). Gambling addiction and its treatment within the NHS: A guide for healthcare professionals. London: British Medical Association.Google Scholar
- Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Research, published Online First: 9 November. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1103.
- Church of England. (2006, September 19). Church questions proposals for gambling advertisements. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://www.churchofengland.org/media-centre/news/2006/09/pr9306.aspx.
- Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Department for Culture, Media and Sports. (2011, July 14). News releases 069/11. Accessed November 3, 2011, from http://www.Culture.gov.uk/news/media_releases/8299.aspx.
- Donnelly, C. (2010). Gambling as a means of relieving distress: Understanding the connections among interpersonal trauma, perceived social support and unsupport, and problem gambling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
- Drinkaware.co.uk. (2012). Binge drinking: The facts. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/binge-drinking?gclid=CJaF6IiSlq8CFY8PfAodpi7IkA.
- European Gaming and Amusement Industry (Euromat). (2007, October 25). Statement on responsible gambling. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.euromat.org/uploads/documents/EUROMAT_brochure_1_web.pdf.
- Gambling Commission. (2012). Licence conditions and codes of practice. Accessed February 15, 2012, from http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/publications_guidance__advic/lccp.aspx.
- Gamcare. (2007). Online Gambling. Accessed February 15, 2012, from http://www.gamcaretradeservices.com/pages/about_us.htmlhttp.
- Gambling News. (2011, January 31). Changes for online gambling in the UK. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.durocher.org/gambling-news/changes-online-gambling-uk.
- H2 Gambling Capital: 2011, E-Gaming Report, July 8, 2011, http://www.h2gc.com/news.php?article=Post+Q2%2FFullTilt+Closure+H2+eGaming+Dataset+Now+Available, accessed 28 October, 2011.
- Gambling Research Australia (GRA). (2008). A review of australian gambling research, Chap. 4: The characteristics of EGMs and their role in gambling and problem gambling. Accessed February 28, 2012, from http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/AnalysisAustGamblingResearch/$file/Chapter%204.pdf.
- Griffiths, M. D. (2005). Does advertising of gambling increase gambling addiction? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (2010a). Social responsibility in marketing for online gaming affiliates. i-Gaming Business Affiliate (June/July), 32.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (2010b). Social responsibility and trust in online gambling: Six steps to success. IGaming Business, 61(March/April), 36.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (2010c). The gaming industry’s role in the prevention and treatment of problem gambling. Casino & Gaming International, 6(1), 87–90.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (2010d). Online ads and the promotion of responsible gambling. World Online Gambling Law Report, 9(6), 14.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 312–320.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
- Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. (1994). Final versions of our non-specific psychological distress scale. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Centre of the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- KPMG International. (2010, April 1). Online gambling, a gamble or a sure bet? Accessed October 28, 2011, from http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/online-gaming-a-gamble-or-a-sure-bet.aspx.
- Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
- Powell, J., Hardoon, K., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (1996). Gambling and risk taking behavior amongst university students. In 10th national conference on gambling behavior, Chicago, IL, 4 September 1996.Google Scholar
- Remote Gambling Association (RGA). (2010). Market size, fact sheets, http://www.rga.eu.com/data/files/resources/fact_sheet__market_size__draft_103_3.pdf.
- Schoen, J. E., Hughes, D., Lewis, P. A., & Marmon, R. (2007). Casino City, Inc. V U.S. Department of Justice Campus access to Internet Gambling and the First Amendment. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 13(2), 67–82.Google Scholar
- Scuffman, M., & Davey, J. (2011, October 27). Stay-at-home britons turn to TV, online gambling. Accessed November 3, 2011, from http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USLNE79Q03U20111027.
- Shaw, M. C., Forbush, K. T., Schlinder, J., Rosenman, E., & Black, D. W. (2007). The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages and children. CNS Spectrums, 12, 615–622.Google Scholar
- Sproston, K., Erens, B., & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain: Results from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California Problem Gambling Prevalence Survey: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling.Google Scholar
- Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Wiebe, J., Mun, P., & Kauffman, N. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in Ontario 2005. Final Report submitted to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, May, 2006, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
- Wiebe, J. (2008). Internet gambling: Strategies to recruit and retain gamblers. Report Prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Report Prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
- Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of “unmentionables”. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
- Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
- Young, K. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar