Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 110, Issue 4, pp 481–497 | Cite as

Can an Industry Be Socially Responsible If Its Products Harm Consumers? The Case of Online Gambling

  • Mirella Yani-de-Soriano
  • Uzma Javed
  • Shumaila Yousafzai
Article

Abstract

Online gambling companies claim that they are ethical providers. They seem committed to corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices that are aimed at preventing or minimising the harm associated with their activities. Our empirical research employed a sample of 209 university student online gamblers, who took part in an online survey. Our findings suggest that the extent of online problem gambling is substantial and that it adversely impacts on the gambler’s mental and physical health, social relationships and academic performance. Online problem gambling seems to be related to the time spent on the Internet and gambling online, parental/peer gambling and binge drinking. As our findings show that there are harmful repercussions associated with online gambling, we argue that companies in this controversial sector cannot reach the higher level of CSR achieved by other industries. Nevertheless, they can gain legitimacy on the basis of their CSR engagement at a transactional level, and so, by meeting their legal and ethical commitments and behaving with transparency and fairness, the integrity of the company can be ensured. We also argue that current failures in the implementation and control of CSR policies, the reliance on revenue from problem gamblers’ losses, and controversial marketing activities appear to constitute the main obstacles in the prevention or minimisation of harm related to online gambling. As online gambling companies must be responsible for the harm related to their activities, we suggest that CSR policies should be fully implemented, monitored and clearly reported; all forms of advertising should be reduced substantially; and unfair or misleading promotional techniques should be banned. The industry should not rely on revenue from problem gamblers, nor should their behaviour be reinforced by marketing activities (i.e. rewards). We realise, however, that it is unrealistic to expect the online gambling industry to prioritise harm prevention over revenue maximisation. Policy makers and regulators, therefore, would need to become involved if the actions suggested above are to be undertaken. CSR is paramount to minimise harm and provide a healthier user experience in this business sector, but it also poses marketing dilemmas. We support a global collaborative approach for the online gambling industry, as harm related to gambling is a public health issue.

Keywords

CSR in controversial industries CSR in online gambling CSR and gambling addiction Marketing activities in the online gambling industry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present research has no competing interests and was funded by Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University. Ethical approval was obtained from the School’s Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Action on Smoking and Health (ASH). (2012). Smoking statistics: Who smokes and how. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_106.pdf.
  2. Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2010). Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada. Psychiatry Research, 178, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Medical Association (AMA). (2001, January 1). Problem gambling. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://ama.com.au/youthhealth/gambling.
  4. Australasian Gaming Council. (2008, November). Factsheet AGC FS 17/08. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.austgamingcouncil.org.au/images/pdf/Fact_Sheets/agc_fs17whatispg.pdf.
  5. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. British Medical Association (BMA). (2007). Gambling addiction and its treatment within the NHS: A guide for healthcare professionals. London: British Medical Association.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Research, published Online First: 9 November. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1103.
  10. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Church of England. (2006, September 19). Church questions proposals for gambling advertisements. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://www.churchofengland.org/media-centre/news/2006/09/pr9306.aspx.
  15. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department for Culture, Media and Sports. (2011, July 14). News releases 069/11. Accessed November 3, 2011, from http://www.Culture.gov.uk/news/media_releases/8299.aspx.
  18. Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E., Ergi, G. E., & Mendelsohn, F. S. (1980). Measures of non-specific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1229–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donnelly, C. (2010). Gambling as a means of relieving distress: Understanding the connections among interpersonal trauma, perceived social support and unsupport, and problem gambling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
  20. Drinkaware.co.uk. (2012). Binge drinking: The facts. Accessed February 25, 2012, from http://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/binge-drinking?gclid=CJaF6IiSlq8CFY8PfAodpi7IkA.
  21. European Gaming and Amusement Industry (Euromat). (2007, October 25). Statement on responsible gambling. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.euromat.org/uploads/documents/EUROMAT_brochure_1_web.pdf.
  22. Fisher, S. (1993). Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gambling Commission. (2012). Licence conditions and codes of practice. Accessed February 15, 2012, from http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/publications_guidance__advic/lccp.aspx.
  24. Gamcare. (2007). Online Gambling. Accessed February 15, 2012, from http://www.gamcaretradeservices.com/pages/about_us.htmlhttp.
  25. Gambling News. (2011, January 31). Changes for online gambling in the UK. Accessed August 24, 2011, from http://www.durocher.org/gambling-news/changes-online-gambling-uk.
  26. H2 Gambling Capital: 2011, E-Gaming Report, July 8, 2011, http://www.h2gc.com/news.php?article=Post+Q2%2FFullTilt+Closure+H2+eGaming+Dataset+Now+Available, accessed 28 October, 2011.
  27. Gambling Research Australia (GRA). (2008). A review of australian gambling research, Chap. 4: The characteristics of EGMs and their role in gambling and problem gambling. Accessed February 28, 2012, from http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/AnalysisAustGamblingResearch/$file/Chapter%204.pdf.
  28. Goodman, A. (1990). Addiction: Definition and implications. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 1403–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gordon, R., & Moodie, C. (2009). Dead cert or long shot: The utility of social marketing in tackling problem gambling in the UK. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does Internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns and recommendations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Griffiths, M. D. (2005). Does advertising of gambling increase gambling addiction? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
  33. Griffiths, M. D. (2010a). Social responsibility in marketing for online gaming affiliates. i-Gaming Business Affiliate (June/July), 32.Google Scholar
  34. Griffiths, M. D. (2010b). Social responsibility and trust in online gambling: Six steps to success. IGaming Business, 61(March/April), 36.Google Scholar
  35. Griffiths, M. D. (2010c). The gaming industry’s role in the prevention and treatment of problem gambling. Casino & Gaming International, 6(1), 87–90.Google Scholar
  36. Griffiths, M. D. (2010d). Online ads and the promotion of responsible gambling. World Online Gambling Law Report, 9(6), 14.Google Scholar
  37. Griffiths, M., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: An online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Heath and Addiction, 6, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 312–320.Google Scholar
  39. Griffiths, M., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
  40. Griffiths, M., Parke, J., Wood, R., & Rigbye, J. (2010a). Online poker gambling in university students: Further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2010b). Gambling, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and health: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Addiction Research & Theory, 18(2), 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and among Internet gamblers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(4), 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gupta, R., Derevensky, J., & Marget, N. (2004). Coping strategies employed by adolescents with gambling problems. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(3), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hancock, L., Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2008). Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy and Society, 27, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ibanez, A., Blanco, C., Donahue, E., Lesieur, H., de Castro, I., et al. (2001). Psychiatric comorbidity in pathological gamblers seeking treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1733–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in the UK gambling industry. Corporate Governance, 9(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. (1994). Final versions of our non-specific psychological distress scale. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Centre of the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  51. KPMG International. (2010, April 1). Online gambling, a gamble or a sure bet? Accessed October 28, 2011, from http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/online-gaming-a-gamble-or-a-sure-bet.aspx.
  52. LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2007). Normative perspectives for ethical and socially responsible marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ladouceur, R., Boisvert, J. M., Pepin, M., Loranger, M., & Sylvain, C. (1994). Social cost of pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ladouceur, R., Boudreault, N., Jacques, C., & Vitaro, F. (1999). Pathological gambling and related problems among adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 8(4), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  58. Lesieur, H. R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., et al. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16(6), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lesieur, H. R., & Klein, R. (1987). Pathological gambling among high school students. Addictive Behaviors, 12(2), 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl. 2), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2004). Corporate citizenship: Let not relationship marketing escape the management toolbox. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2008). Introduction: Corporate social responsibility implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Matthews, N., Farnsworth, B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). A pilot study of problem gambling among student online gamblers: Mood states and predictors of problematic behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behavior in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental & Health Addiction, 7, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Monaghan, S. (2009). Internet gambling—Not just a fad. International Gambling Studies, 9(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moodie, C. (2008). Student gambling, erroneous cognitions, and awareness of treatment in Scotland. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21(3), 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moodie, C., & Reith, G. (2009). Responsible gambling signage on electronic gaming machines, before and after the implementation of the United Kingdom Gambling Act: An observational study. International Gambling Studies, 9(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moore, S., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Petry, N. M. (2006). Internet gambling: An emerging concern in family practice medicine? Family Practice, 23, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Powell, J., Hardoon, K., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (1996). Gambling and risk taking behavior amongst university students. In 10th national conference on gambling behavior, Chicago, IL, 4 September 1996.Google Scholar
  75. Reith, G. (2007). Gambling and the contradictions of consumption, a genealogy of the “pathological” subject. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Remote Gambling Association (RGA). (2010). Market size, fact sheets, http://www.rga.eu.com/data/files/resources/fact_sheet__market_size__draft_103_3.pdf.
  77. Sanders, W., & Peters, A. (2009). Pathological gambling: influence of quality of life and psychological distress on abstinence after cognitive-behavioral inpatient treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schoen, J. E., Hughes, D., Lewis, P. A., & Marmon, R. (2007). Casino City, Inc. V U.S. Department of Justice Campus access to Internet Gambling and the First Amendment. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 13(2), 67–82.Google Scholar
  79. Scuffman, M., & Davey, J. (2011, October 27). Stay-at-home britons turn to TV, online gambling. Accessed November 3, 2011, from http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USLNE79Q03U20111027.
  80. Sevigny, S., Cloutier, M., Pelletier, M., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Internet gambling: Misleading payout rates during the “demo” period. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shaw, M. C., Forbush, K. T., Schlinder, J., Rosenman, E., & Black, D. W. (2007). The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages and children. CNS Spectrums, 12, 615–622.Google Scholar
  83. Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, A. D., & Rupp, W. T. (2005). Service marketing aspects associated with the allure of e-gambling. Services Marketing Quarterly, 26(3), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sproston, K., Erens, B., & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain: Results from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  86. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  87. Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California Problem Gambling Prevalence Survey: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling.Google Scholar
  88. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  89. Wiebe, J., Mun, P., & Kauffman, N. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in Ontario 2005. Final Report submitted to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, May, 2006, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
  90. Wiebe, J. (2008). Internet gambling: Strategies to recruit and retain gamblers. Report Prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
  91. Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Report Prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
  92. Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2004). The proportion of gaming revenue derived from problem gamblers: Examining the issues in a Canadian context. Analyses of social issues and public policy, 4(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of “unmentionables”. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
  94. Winters, K. C., Bengston, P., Dorr, D., & Stinchfield, R. (1998). Prevalence and risk factors of problem gambling among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Patterns and characteristics of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(4), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: Methodological issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wood, R. T., Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2007). Problem gambling on the Internet: implications for Internet Gambling Policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9(3), 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
  100. Young, K. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirella Yani-de-Soriano
    • 1
  • Uzma Javed
    • 2
  • Shumaila Yousafzai
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff Business SchoolCardiff UniversityCardiffWales, UK
  2. 2.Management Sciences DepartmentCIITIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations