Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 110, Issue 4, pp 413–427 | Cite as

Striving for Legitimacy Through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies

  • Shuili DuEmail author
  • Edward T. VieiraJr.
Article

Abstract

Being a controversial industry, oil companies turn to corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a means to obtain legitimacy. Adopting a case study methodology, this research examines the characteristics of CSR strategies and CSR communication tactics of six oil companies by analyzing their 2011–2012 web site content. We found that all six companies engaged in CSR activities addressing the needs of various stakeholders and had cross-sector partnerships. CSR information on these companies’ web sites was easily accessible, often involving the use of multimedia technologies and sometimes social media platforms. Furthermore, to boost the credibility of their CSR messages, these companies utilized a variety of tactics, such as factual arguments and two-sided messages. In sum, this research unveils the interconnectedness among business strategy, CSR practices, and CSR communication in oil companies’ attempt to gain legitimacy in an environment of controversy. The article ends with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the research findings.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Communication Legitimacy Oil industry Controversial industries Corporate website 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments which contributed greatly to this manuscript.

References

  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC News. (2011). US court rules against Chevron in Ecuador oil case. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-14983123. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
  3. Bennett, W., & Edelman, M. (1985). Toward a new political narrative. Journal of Communication, 35, 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49(4), 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.Google Scholar
  8. Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  11. Chakravorti, B. (2010). Stakeholder marketing 2.0. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chemical News & Intelligence. (2010). Texas Regulator Fines Valero $186,400 for Air Emission Violations, September 29.Google Scholar
  13. Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawkins, J. (2004). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Du, S., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2008). Exploring the social and business returns of a corporate oral health initiative aimed at disadvantaged Hispanic families. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.Google Scholar
  23. Ellerman, D. (2001). Helping people help themselves: Toward a theory of autonomy-compatible help, Working Paper No. 2693, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1/2), 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Escobar, L. F., & Vredenburg, H. (2011). Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: A resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Financial Wire. (2007). Marathon oil to pay $1 million fine, August 2.Google Scholar
  28. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 301–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  29. Fortune. (2011). Fortune 500 2011 list: Petroleum refining. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2011/industries/20/index.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2011.
  30. Fortune. (2012). Fortune 500 2012 list: Petroleum refining. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2012/industries/20/. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  31. Frynas, J. G. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Gazette. (2011). Landowners Sue ExxonMobil over Yellowstone River Oil Spill, October 4. http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/article_8ce89c35-c657-5651-bf4f-4b07c6065f7c.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
  34. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (p. 07430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gourville, J. T., & Rangan, K. V. (2004). Valuing the cause marketing relationship. California Management Review, 47(1), 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European View, 10(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henderson, L., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). The human drama of genetics: Hard and soft media representations of inherited breast cancer. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5), 560–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hill, R. P., Ainscough, T., Shank, T., & Manullang, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger Delta: A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kane, G. C., Fichman, R. G., Gallaugher, J., & Glaser, J. (2009). Community relations 2.0. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 45–50.Google Scholar
  47. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizon, 53, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Korschun, D., & S. Du. (2012). How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. Journal of Business Research (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  50. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. http://www.in.kpmg.com/SecureData/aci/Files/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2012.
  52. Lee, M. Y., Fairhurst, A., & Wesley, S. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: A review of the top 100 US retailers. Corporation Reputation Review, 12(2), 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MaHoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moreno, A., & Capriotti, P. (2009). Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web. Journal of Communication Management, 13(2), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. New York Times. (2001). Mobil faulted for payments in central Asia, p. 6.Google Scholar
  60. New York Times. (2011). Ecuador judge orders Chevron to pay $9 billion. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/world/americas/15ecuador.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2011.
  61. Oil and Gas Journal. (1981). Three refiners charged with price violations, November 16, p. 158.Google Scholar
  62. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pechmann, C. (1992). Predicting when two-sided ads will be more effective than one-sided ads: The role of correlational and correspondent inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(November), 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic view. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  66. Pollach, I. (2003). Communicating corporate ethics on the world wide web: A disclosure analysis of selected company web sites. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  68. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  69. Robin, D. P., & Reidenbach, R. E. (1987). Social responsibility, ethics, and marketing strategy: Closing the gap between concepts and application. Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosenfel, L., & Morville, P. (1998). Information architecture for the world wide web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  71. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(December), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sen, S., Du, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). Building brand relationships through corporate social responsibility. In D. J. Maclnnis, C. W. Park, & J. R. Priester (Eds.), Handbook of brand relationships (pp. 195–211). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  74. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Settle, R. B., & Golden, L. L. (1974). Attribution theory and advertiser credibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(May), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  77. van Laer, T., & de Ruyter, K. (2010). In stories we trust: How narrative apologies provide cover for competitive vulnerability after integrity-violating blog posts. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2), 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Stank, T. P., Goldsby, T. J., & Markland, R. E. (2004). The performance implications of media richness in a business-to-business service environment: Direct versus indirect effects. Management Science, 50(8), 1106–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wanderley, L., Lucian, R., Farache, F., & Sousa Filho, J. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: A context-based approach analyzing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woolfson, C., & Beck, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility failures in the oil industry. New York: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 125–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simmons CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations