Exploring the Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility—A Comparison of Research Methods
- 1.6k Downloads
This paper argues the case that tests of how investors value corporate social performance (CSP) based upon realised stock market returns are liable to be weak tests if markets are efficient and firms change CSP policies infrequently. We provide a theoretical explanation of why this will be the case using examples to illustrate. Subsequently, we set out an alternative theoretical framework for the purposes of investigating whether markets place a positive, or a negative, valuation on CSP, and show why this is superior to tests based upon Tobin’s Q. Using US KLD data, we demonstrate that, as theorised, markets place a positive value on CSP that is not detected by conventional returns-based tests. Our conclusion is that researchers who are interested in the question of whether engagement with a corporate social responsibility agenda is a value-enhancing activity for a company (as argued by some stakeholder theorists) or value destructive (as argued by Friedman, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine, 1970), need to look beyond returns-based tests to answer the research question posed.
KeywordsCorporate social performance Valuation methods
- Barnett, M. L., & Salomon. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.1980.
- Barraclough, K. (2007). Scaling regression equations: Solution or problem? Vanderbilt University working paper. http://22.214.171.124/CaesareaAdmin/Uploads/ES/Events/Files/271.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2008.
- Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, Autumn, 5–25.Google Scholar
- Davidson, W. N, I. I. I., & Worrell, D. L. (1990). A comparison and test of the use of accounting and stock market data in relating corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21(3), 7–19.Google Scholar
- Edwards, E., & Bell, P. (1961). The theory and measurement of business income. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
- Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & A. Christidis. (2011). Constructing and testing alternative versions of the Fama–French and Carhart models in the UK. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1951831.
- Gregory, A., Whittaker, J., & Yan, X. (2011). Stock market valuation of corporate social responsibility indicators. Discussion paper 10/06, Centre for Finance and Investment, University of Exeter Business School.Google Scholar
- Gu, F., & Li, J. Q. (2010). The value-relevance of advertising: Evidence from pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(1), 85–120.Google Scholar
- Shen, Y., & A. W. Stark (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of model specifications and estimation approaches for empirical accounting-based valuation models. SSRN working paper no. 1888386.Google Scholar
- Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463–490.Google Scholar