Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 37–48

Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management

Article

Abstract

This article examines the ethical framing of employment in contemporary human resource management (HRM). Using Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition and classical critical notions of reification, I contrast recognition and reifying stances on labor. The recognition approach embeds work in its emotive and social particularity, positively affirming the basic dignity of social actors. Reifying views, by contrast, exhibit a forgetfulness of recognition, removing action from its existential and social moorings, and imagining workers as bundles of discrete resources or capacities. After discussing why reification is a problem, I stress that recognition and reification embody different ethical standpoints with regards to organizational practices. Thus, I argue paradoxically that many current HRM best practices can be maintained while cultivating an attitude of recognition. If reification is a type of forgetting, cultivating a recognition attitude involves processes of “remembering” to foster work relations that reinforce employee dignity.

Keywords

Human resources Recognition Dignity Frankfurt School Critical theory Reification 

References

  1. Ball, K. (2005). Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, P., & Pullberg, S. (1966). Reification and the sociological critique of consciousness. New Left Review, 35, 56–71.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, J. (2006). All together now: Common sense for a new economy. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Borman, D. A. (2009). Labour, exchange and recognition: Marx contra Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(8), 935–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 5(1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burris, V. (1988). Reification: A Marxist perspective. California Sociologist, 10(1), 22–43.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (2008). Taking anothers view: Ambivalent implications. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 97–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carlon, D. M., Downs, A. A., & Wert-Gray, S. (2006). Statistics as fetishes: The case of financial performance measures and executive compensation. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 475–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavell, S. (1976). Knowing and acknowledging. In S. Cavell (Ed.), Must we mean what we say? (pp. 278–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chari, A. (2010). Toward a political critique of reification: Lukacs, Honneth and the aims of critical theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(5), 587–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopherson, S. (2008). Beyond the self-expressive creative worker: An industry perspective on entertainment media. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deranty, J. P. (2008). Work and the precarisation of existence. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deranty, J. P., & Renault, E. (2007). Politicizing Honneth’s ethics of recognition. Thesis Eleven, 88(1), 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and civilization. New York: Balch.Google Scholar
  16. Duttmann, A. G. (2000). Between cultures: Tensions in the struggle for recognition (Kenneth B. Woodgate, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, pp. 1–14. http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1100.0612v1.
  18. Foss, N. J. (2008). Human capital and transaction cost economics, SMG Working Paper No. 2, Copenhagen Business School Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political–philosophical exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Gellner, E. (1996). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Gill, F. (1999). The meaning of work: Lessons from sociology, psychology, and political theory. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(6), 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Gutmann, A. (1994). Preface. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Exploring the politics of recognition (pp. 9–12). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action. London: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heery, E. (2008). Runt redux: The rise of human resource management as a field of study. Work and Occupations, 35(3), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Heinich, N. (2009). The sociology of vocational prizes: Recognition as esteem. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hillard, M. G. (2005). The failure of labor–management cooperation at two Maine paper mills: A case study. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 14, 127–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holgrewe, U. (2001). Recognition, intersubjectivity and service work: Labour conflicts in call centres. The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1), 37–54.Google Scholar
  34. Honneth, A. (1995a). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Honneth, A. (1995b). Work and instrumental action: On the normative basis of critical theory. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social (pp. 15–49). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  36. Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64(1), 30–32.Google Scholar
  37. Honneth, A. (2002). Grounding recognition: A rejoinder to critical questions. Inquiry, 45, 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser (J. Golb, & J. Ingram, Trans.). In Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical profile (pp. 110–197). Verso: New York.Google Scholar
  39. Honneth, A. (2008a). Reification and recognition: A new look at an old idea. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 17–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Honneth, A. (2008b). Rejoinder. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea(pp 147–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Honneth, A. (2009). Work and recognition: A redefinition, presentation at work and recognition. An international conference, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  42. Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001). Recognition. Aristotelian Society Proceedings, 75, 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1999). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  44. Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2008). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology (pp. 110–135). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  46. Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–94.Google Scholar
  47. Jay, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kallinikos, J. (2003). Work, human agency and organizational forms: An anatomy of fragmentation. Organization Studies, 24(4), 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lear, J. (2008). The slippery middle. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 131–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). Seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  53. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  54. Lovell, T. (2007). Introduction. In T. Lovell (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  57. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moll, K. N. (2009). The enduring significance of Axel Honneth’s critical conception of work. Emergent Australian Philosophers, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
  59. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  61. Pinnington, A., Macklin, R., & Campbell, T. (2007). Human resource management: Ethics and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  64. Rowan, J. R. (2000). The moral foundation of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14(4), 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Simon, H. A. (1951). A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica, 19(3), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stone, K. V. W. (2002). Knowledge at work: Disputes over the ownership of human capital in the changing workplace. Connecticut Law Review, 34, 721–763.Google Scholar
  69. Thompson, E. P. (1924/1993). Customs in common. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.Google Scholar
  71. van Marrewijk, M., & Timmers, J. (2003). Human capital management: New possibilities in people management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whyte, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wiley, C. (2000). Ethical standards for human resource management professionals: A comparative analysis of five major codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000). The ethical dimensions of human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Insper Institute for Education and ResearchSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations