Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 207–223 | Cite as

Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

  • Arifur Khan
  • Mohammad Badrul Muttakin
  • Javed Siddiqui


We examine the relationship between corporate governance and the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in the annual reports of Bangladeshi companies. A legitimacy theory framework is adopted to understand the extent to which corporate governance characteristics, such as managerial ownership, public ownership, foreign ownership, board independence, CEO duality and presence of audit committee influence organisational response to various stakeholder groups. Our results suggest that although CSR disclosures generally have a negative association with managerial ownership, such relationship becomes significant and positive for export-oriented industries. We also find public ownership, foreign ownership, board independence and presence of audit committee to have positive significant impacts on CSR disclosures. However, we fail to find any significant impact of CEO duality. Thus, our results suggest that pressures exerted by external stakeholder groups and corporate governance mechanisms involving independent outsiders may allay some concerns relating to family influence on CSR disclosure practices. Overall, our study implies that corporate governance attributes play a vital role in ensuring organisational legitimacy through CSR disclosures. The findings of our study should be of interest to regulators and policy makers in countries which share similar corporate ownership and regulatory structures.


Corporate social responsibility Corporate governance Legitimacy theory Disclosure Bangladesh 


  1. Ahmed, S. & Siddiqui, J. (2011). Audit committee interactions with external auditors: Evidence from an emerging economy, Working paper, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  2. Ararat, M., & Ugur, M. (2003). Corporate governance in Turkey: An overview and some policy recommendations. Corporate Governance, 3(1), 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azim, M. I., Ahmed, A., & Shahidul, M. (2009). Corporate social reporting practice: Evidence from listed companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 10(2), 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belal, A. R. (2000). Environmental reporting in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eco-Management and Auditing, 7(3), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belal, A. R. (2001). a study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(5), 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belal, A. R., & Cooper, S. (2011). Absence of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh: A research note. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(7), 654–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belal, A. R., & Owen, D. L. (2007). The view of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 472–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belal, A., & Roberts, R. (2010). Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beltratti, A. (2005). The complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance, 30, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biggart, N. W. (1991). Explaining Asian economic organization: Toward a Weberian institutional perspective. Theory and Society, 20(2), 199–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323–350.Google Scholar
  12. Bradbury, M. E. (1991). Characteristics of firms and voluntary interim earnings disclosure: New Zealand evidence. Pacific Accounting Review, 3, 37–62.Google Scholar
  13. Bradbury, M., Mark, Y. T., & Tan, S. M. (2006). Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18(2), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chau, G., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chau, G., & Gray, S. J. (2010). Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, C. J. P., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4/5), 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, E., & Nowland, J. (2010). Optimal board monitoring in family-owned companies: Evidence from Asia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Claessens, S., & Fan, J. P. (2002). Corporate governance in Asia: A survey. International Review of Finance, 3(2), 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarke, T. (2007). International Corporate Governance: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Cooke, T. E. (1992). The impact of size, stock market listing and industry type on disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 22(8/7), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cullen, L., & Christopher, T. (2002). Governance disclosures and firm characteristics of listed Australian mining companies. International Journal of Business Studies, 10(1), 37–58.Google Scholar
  25. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dentchev, N. A. (2004). Corporate social performance as a business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farooque, O. A., Zijl, T. V., Dunstan, K., & Karim, A. K. M. W. (2007). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: Link between ownership concentration and financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1453–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y., & Piesse, J. (2005). Corporate governance and performance in publicly controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(3), 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. FRC. (2011). The combined code. UK: Financial Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  34. Fukukawa, K., Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2007). Mapping the interface between corporate identity, ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghazali, N. A. M. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance, 7(3), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosures: Opportunism, ritualism, politics and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. GOB. (1994). Companies Act, 1994. Ministry of Commerce, Government of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  38. GOB. (2008). Tax rebate on corporate social responsibility expenditures. SRO 270-Law/2009. National Board of Revenue, Government of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  39. GOB. (2011). Tax rebate on corporate social responsibility expenditures. SRO 229-law/Income tax/2011 replacing SRO 270-Law/2009. National Board of Revenue, Government of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  40. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Social and environmental accounting in a changing world. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton, G. G., & Biggart, N. M. (1988). Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S52–S94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the ethical identity of Islamic banks via communication in annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ho, S., & Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Imam, S. (2000). Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Imam, M. O., & Malik, M. (2007). Firm performance and corporate governance through ownership structure: Evidence from Bangladesh stock market. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(4), 88–110.Google Scholar
  51. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Joh, S. W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 287–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johnshon, R. D., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effect of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. (2008). Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34(4), 765–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kuasirikun, N. (2005). Attitudes to the development and implementation of social and environmental accounting in Thailand. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 1035–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kuo, Y., & Hung, J. (2012). Family control and investment cash-flow sensitivity: Moderating effects of excess control rights and board independence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindblom, C. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  61. Lodhia, S. (2003). Accountants’ response to the environmental agenda in developing nation: An initial and exploratory study on Fiji. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 715–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mukherjee-Reed, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance reforms in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neter, J., Wasserman, w, & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  64. Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  66. Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  67. Petra, S. T. (2005). Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards. Corporate Governance, 5(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pomeroy, B., & Thornton, D. B. (2008). Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Purushothaman, M., Tower, G., Hancock, R., & Taplin, R. (2000). Determinants of corporate social reporting practices of listed Singapore companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 12(2), 101–133.Google Scholar
  70. Rahman, R. A., & Ali, F. H. M. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rahaman, A. S., Lawrence, S., & Roper, J. (2004). Social and environmental reporting at VRA: Institutionalised legitimacy or legitimacy crisis? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reaz, M., & Arun, T. (2006). Corporate governance in developing economics: Perspective from the banking sector in Bangladesh. Journal of Banking Regulation, 7(1/2), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reed, D. (2002). Corporate governance reforms in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(3), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schipper, K. (1981). Discussion of voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research (Supp), 19, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. SEC: 2006 ‘Order Relating to Corporate Governance’, Securities and Exchange Commission, Bangladesh SEC/CMRRCD/02-06.Google Scholar
  78. SEC. (2012). Proposed amendment: Corporate governance rules, Securities and Exchange Commission of Bangladesh, No. SEC/CMRRCD/2006-158.Google Scholar
  79. Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 63–74.Google Scholar
  80. Siddiqui, J. (2010). Development of corporate governance regulations: The case of an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sobhan, F. & W. Werner. (2003). Diagnostic study of existing corporate governances scenario in Bangladesh. In Sobhan, F. & Werner, W. (Eds.). A comparative analysis of corporate governance in South Asia (pp. 34–59). Working Paper. Bangladesh Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  82. Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2004). The corporate governance effects of audit committees. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: Informal processes and behaviour effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 765–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Uddin, S., & Choudhury, J. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustration from less-developed country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1026–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  86. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management effect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. West, A. (2006). Theorising corporate governance in South Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(4), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2002). The equity ownership structure of Thai firms. In J. P. H. Fan, M. Hanazaki, & J. Teranishi (Eds.), Designing financial systems in East Asia and Japan toward a twenty-first century paradigm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. World Bank. (2009). Bangladesh: Corporate governance country assessment. Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC).Google Scholar
  90. Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1/2), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arifur Khan
    • 1
  • Mohammad Badrul Muttakin
    • 1
  • Javed Siddiqui
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Accounting, Economics and FinanceDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations