Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 113, Issue 2, pp 265–283 | Cite as

Antecedents of Corporate Scandals: CEOs’ Personal Traits, Stakeholders’ Cohesion, Managerial Fraud, and Imbalanced Corporate Strategy

  • Fabio Zona
  • Mario Minoja
  • Vittorio Coda
Article

Abstract

This study examines the antecedents of corporate scandals. Corporate scandals are defined as rare events occurring at the apex of corporate fame when managerial fraud suddenly emerges in conjunction with a significant gap between perceived corporate success and actual economic conditions. Previous studies on managerial fraud have examined the antecedents of illegal acts in isolation from strategic decisions and in terms of CEOs’ individual responses to the external context. This study frames the antecedents of corporate scandals in terms of the interplay of CEOs’ personal traits with corporate strategy and stakeholders’ cohesion. With this aim, this study builds on extant theory to examine the case of Banca Popolare di Lodi, an Italian bank involved in a corporate scandal in year 2005. The model contributes to advance understanding of the complex dynamics underlying the emergence of corporate scandals.

Keywords

CEO Corporate scandals Corporate strategy Managerial fraud Stakeholders 

References

  1. Allio, R. J. (2007). Bad leaders; how they get that way and what to do about them. Strategy and Leadership, 35, 12–17.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Amernic, J., & Craig, R. (2010). Accounting as a facilitator of extreme narcissism. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., & Reed, A, II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology, 44, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits when psychopaths go to work. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  9. Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 174–193.Google Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (1988). The inspirational processes of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 7(5), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2006). Unveiling the creation and content of strategic processes: How and what firms learn from heterogeneous experience. Proceedings of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  14. Boddy, C. R. (2006). The dark side of management decisions: Organisational psychopaths. Management Decision, 44, 1461–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boddy, C. R. (2011). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boddy, C. R., Ladyshewsky, R., & Galvin, P. G. (2010). The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bragues, G. (2008). The ancients against the moderns: Focusing on the character of corporate leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carson, T. L. (2003). Self-interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, S. (2010). The role of ethical leadership versus institutional constraints: A simulation study of financial misreporting by CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarke, J. (2005). Working with monsters. How to identify and protect yourself from the workplace psychopath. Sydney: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, J. (2007). The pocket psycho. Sydney: Random House.Google Scholar
  23. Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. C. (1980). Corporate crime. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Coda, V. (2010). Entrepreneurial values and strategic management. Essays in management theory. NY: Bocconi University Press, Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Cohan, J. A. (2002). “I Didn’t Know” and “I Was Only Doing My Job”: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 637–647.Google Scholar
  27. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M. A., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 138–170.Google Scholar
  29. Dess, G., & Beard, D. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J, III (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environment: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Finkelstein, S. (2003). Why smart executives failes. New York: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
  35. Finney, H. C., & Leiseur, H. R. (1982). A contingency theory of organizational crime. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 255–299.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  37. Frost, A. G., & Rafilson, F. M. (1989). Overt integrity tests versus personality-based measures of delinquency: An empirical comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gordon, J. R. (1996). A diagnostic approach to organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grunert, S. C., & Scherhorn, G. (1990). Consumer values in West Germany: Underlying dimensions and cross-cultural comparison with North America. Journal of Business Research, 20, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 93–206.Google Scholar
  43. Hanson, K. O., & Velasquez, M. (1988). The Boeing company: Managing ethics and values. In J. Keogh (Ed.), Corporate ethics: A prime business asset. New York: The Business Roundtable.Google Scholar
  44. Hare, R. D. (2002). Psychopathy and risk for recidivism and violence. In N. Gray, J. Laing, & L. Noaks (Eds.), Criminal justice, mental health and the politics of risk (pp. 27–47). London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  45. Harris, J. D., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1987). Causes of white collar crime. Criminology, 25, 949–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holmes, R. M, Jr, Bromiley, P., Devers, C. E., Holcomb, T. R., & McGuire, J. B. (2011). Management theory applications of prospect theory: Accomplishments, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1069–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hood, J. N. (2003). The relationship of leadership style and CEO values to ethical practices in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Howel, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executives, 6(2), 43–54.Google Scholar
  51. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  52. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kahle, L. R., & Goff Timmer, G. (1983). A theory and method for studying values. In L. R. Kahle (Ed.), Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America (pp. 43–69). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  55. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.Google Scholar
  57. Kesner, I. F., Victor, B., & Lamont, B. T. (1986). Research Notes. Board composition and the commission of illegal acts: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). Leaders, fools, and imposter: Essays on the psychology of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Klein, K. J., & House, R. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  62. MacIntyre, A. C. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  63. MacLean, T. (2008). Framing and organizational misconduct: A symbolic interactionist study. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33, 1404–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1992). Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, 99, 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCormick, I., & Burch, G. (2005). Snakes in suits: Fear and loathing in corporate clothing. New Zealand Management, 76, 34–35.Google Scholar
  68. Minoja, M., Zollo, M., & Coda, V. (2010). Stakeholder cohesion, innovation, and competitive advantage. Corporate Governance: An International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moberg, D. J. (1997). On employee vice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morosetti, P., & Zona, F. (2004). Enron: Giochi d’azzardo. Strategie ed errori: La lezione Enron. Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  71. Morrison, A. (2001). Integrity and global leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Palmer, T. B., & Wiseman, R. M. (1999). Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20(11), 1037–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 730–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rayburn, J. M., & Rayburn, L. G. (1996). Relationship between Machiavellianism and Type A personality and ethical-orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1209–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reed, A, I. I., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1270–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  78. Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic Leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scott, E. D. (2002). Organizational moral values. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Staw, B. M., & Szwajkowski, E. (1975). The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(3), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  85. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 266–285.Google Scholar
  87. Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business & Society, 40, 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wink, P. (1992). Three narcissism scales for the California Q-set. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
  89. Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Individual differences in the acceptability of unethical information technology practices: The case of machiavellianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioural agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.Google Scholar
  91. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  92. Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zona, F. (2012). Corporate investing as a response to economic downturn: Prospect theory, the behavioural agency model and the role of financial slack. British Journal of Management. Article first published online March 6, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00818.x.
  94. Zona, F., & Zattoni, A. (2007). Beyond the black box of demography: Board processes and task effectiveness within Italian firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 852–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and TechnologyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Communication and Economics SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly

Personalised recommendations