Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 453–461 | Cite as

The Relationship between the Integration of Faith and Work with Life and Job Outcomes

  • Alan G. Walker


Gallup surveys consistently show that nine in 10 Americans express a belief in God (Nash, Business, religion, and spirituality: A new synthesis, 2003), while more than 45 % claim to have some awareness of God on the job (Nash and McLellan, Church on Sunday, Work on Monday: The Challenges of Fusing Christian Values with Business Life, 2001). Recently, Lynn et al. (Journal of Business Ethics 85:227–243, 2009) argued that the ability to integrate the specific beliefs and practices of one’s faith with the work one does represent an important although neglected area of research. As such, they developed and demonstrated convergent validity for the faith at work scale, designed to measure the extent to which individuals believe they are able to integrate their Judaeo-Christian beliefs and practices and their work. In a subsequent study, Lynn et al. (Human Relations 64:675–701, 2010) demonstrated that the faith at work scale was related to faith maturity, church attendance, age, and denominational strictness, and negatively associated with organizational size. No research, however, has examined the possible positive benefits of integrating faith and work. I therefore developed and tested hypotheses concerning the relationship between the faith at work scale and seven important life and work outcomes (satisfaction with life, intent to leave one’s job, self-rated job performance, job satisfaction, and three forms of organizational commitment). In all, four of seven hypotheses were confirmed.


Religion Spirituality Faith at work 


  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. O. (2004). Employees goal orientations, the quality of leader–member exchange and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self- evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, J. E. (2008). (Dis)Missing the obvious: Will mainstream management research ever take religion seriously? Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birklebach, D., & Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435–455.Google Scholar
  13. Lynn, M. L., Naughton, M. J., & VanderVeen, S. (2009). Faith at work scale (FAW): Justification, development, and validation of a measure of Judaeo-Christian religion in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynn, M. L., Naughton, M. J., & VanderVeen, S. (2010). Connecting religion and work: Patterns and influences of work-faith integration. Human Relations, 64, 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nash, L. L. (2003). A spiritual audit of business: From tipping point to tripping point. In O. F. Williams (Ed.), Business, religion and spirituality: A new synthesis. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nash, L. L., & McLennan, S. (2001). Church on sunday, work on monday: The challenges of fusing christian values with business life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Human resource management: gaining a competitive advantage (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Pfeffer, J. (2003). Business and the spirit. In R. A. Giacalone & C. L. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (1989). A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior, Working paper. Bloomington: Indiana University, Indiana.Google Scholar
  21. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A Symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 77–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementCenter for Ethical Organizational Cultures, Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations