The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
This research consists of two studies with interrelated objectives. The purpose of the first study is to develop and validate scales measuring whistle-blowing subjective norms, attitudes, and intentions. The objective of the second study is to test a model of whistle-blowing intentions, motivated by the theory of reasoned action, across two contrasting cultures: the collectivist Thai and the individualistic American. To achieve cross-cultural comparisons, we first perform measurement and structural invariance tests. Tests of latent mean differences lend support for our prediction that individuals in the collectivist Thai culture have higher means on subjective norms, attitudes, and intentions for whistle-blowing than members of the individualist American culture. Our models indicate that subjective norms for whistle-blowing, even though significantly different for American and Thai participants, have a direct effect on whistle-blowing attitudes as well as direct and indirect effects on reporting intentions for both subject groups. Compared to American subjects, the whistle-blowing intentions of Thai participants are more strongly influenced by subjective norms for whistle-blowing.
KeywordsWhistle-blowing Culture Invariance testing Subjective norms Theory of reasoned action
- Ajzen, I. (2002a). Sample TpB questionnaire. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from the website: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~aizen/pdf/tpb.questionnaire.pdf.
- Ajzen, I. (2002b). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from the website: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~ajzen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. M. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22((5) September), 453–474.Google Scholar
- Bame-Aldred, C., Sweeney, J. T., & Seifert, D. (2007). An examination of the effectiveness of Sarbanes-Oxley whistle-blower protection. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 8, 105–118.Google Scholar
- Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Chiu, C.-y., & Hong, Y-y. (2007). Cultural processes. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 34, pp. 785–804). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Comrey, & Lee, (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Ellis, S., & Arieli, S. (1999). Predicting intention to report administrative and disciplinary infractions: Applying the reasoned action model. Human Relations, 52(7), 947–967.Google Scholar
- Feldman, Y., & Lobel, O. (2007). Behavioral versus institutional antecedents of decentralized enforcement in organizations: An experimental approach. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-126. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031853.
- Figg, J. (2000). Whistleblowing. The Internal Auditor, 57(2), 30–37.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Fiske, A. P., Kitiyama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915–981). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & M. Boudreau. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4, article 7: 1–77.Google Scholar
- Hirschfeld, G. H. F., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Factorial and structural invariance of the SCoA across sex, age, and ethnicity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 30–38.Google Scholar
- Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 105, 117–144.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- KPMG Forensic. (2008). Integrity survey 2008–2009. New York, NY: KPMG LLP.Google Scholar
- Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657–678.Google Scholar
- Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20(2), 439–464.Google Scholar
- Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in Organizations. New York, NY: Lea’s Organization and Management Series.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2005). Chi-square difference testing using the S-B scaled Chi-square. Note on Mplus website, www.statmodel.com.
- Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Nolan, R. (2002). Development anthropology: Encounters in the real world. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20(3), 643–671.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Mc-Graw Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). Public law 107–204. 107th Congress, 2nd session. July 30, 2002.Google Scholar
- Shaftel, J., & Shaftel, T. L. (2005). The influence of effective teaching in accounting on student attitudes, behavior, and performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(3), 231–246.Google Scholar
- Trairatvorakul, P. (1998). The importance of corporate governance reforms in the recovery from financial crisis: Viewpoint from Thailand. Paper presented at the conference on “Managing Asia’s financial sector recovery: The role of competition policy and corporate governance.” Singapore, November. http://wb-cu.car.chula.ac.th/papers/corpgov/cg071.htm.
- Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L., Deshaies, P., Cuerrier, J., & Mongeau, C. (1992). Azjen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 62(1), 98–109.Google Scholar
- Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2002). Using the theory of reasoned action to predict organizational misbehavior. Psychological Reports, 91, 1027–1040.Google Scholar
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zanna, M. P., & Rampel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar