Whither Stakeholder Theory? A Guide for the Perplexed Revisited
- 2k Downloads
The nature of stakeholder theory and its fundamental normative prescriptions are the subject of much confusion and academic debate. This article attempts to provide an account of both the fundamental normative implications of stakeholder theory and the theory’s range of application that both stakeholder advocates and critics can agree upon. Using exclusively the language of leading stakeholder theorists, the article identifies the essential prescriptions of the theory and the type of organizations to which stakeholder theory applies in the hope of facilitating effective discussion and evaluation of the normative dimension of stakeholder theory.
KeywordsStakeholder theory Agency theory Organizational ethics Labor unions
- Derry, R. (2012). Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1205-x.
- Donaldson, T. (2011). The inescapability of a minimal version of normative stakeholder theory. In Robert A. Phillips (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects (p. 130). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In T. Donaldson, et al. (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (7th ed., p. 44). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
- Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar